"Censorship is the objective destruction of art."
get fucked
Still going to sell millions.
>>730903253are you agreeing with OP or not? I can't tell from your schizo image
>>730903327Square Enix supporters tend to embrace schizophrenia pretty quickly to die for their masters.
>>730903321>spend 500 quadrillion yen (70 million US dollars) making a new game>it flops because it's 3 hours long with as much gameplay depth as Stardew Valley>spend 500k US dollars porting an old game>it sells millionsWill they ever make new AA games that are good, or are they destined to just go bankrupt because (((shareholders))) want them to keep trying to make a AAAA game?
>>730903327he's calling OP a fat chud and telling him he voted for this
>>730903445Yuji Horii/Armor Project doesn't have to do shit. They own Dragon Quest and answer to nobody. If Square goes under they'll just find a new publisher.
>bla bla bla metaphor lost>bla bla bla company to outlive your bloodline>bla bla bla share prices never been higher>bla bla bla something something turn-based bad>bla bla bla not-particularly-thinly-veiled schizophrenia>bla bla bla final fantasy somehow still won despite rebirth flopping>bla bla bla censorship is actually okay>bla bla bla expedition 33 seethe out of nowhereDid I cover them all?
>>730903580Sounds like Square needs to go under sooner, but knowing the japs they'll partner up with Sony and add in even more censorship and faggotry.
not even their first victim
>>730903698Armor Project is just a license holder who will whore DQ out to whoever pays to get it. Square Enix just happens to pay the best.
>still no dq4 or dq5 remakes>still no dq8 or dq9 remake>still no dq10 for western piggu
>>730903936>dq4Wasn't there a DS version?
>>730903936would you people please just stop buying sloppy remakes
>>730904160vgh youre right if they put out a new dq4 remake they'll probably try to sell the psaro chapter as dlc or something
Interesting, but not concerning.
MARIBEL MAYDE HAS SEX WITH OLD MEN FOR MONEY
>>730904292How do you figure?
>>730902997basedwomen need to learn to not walk around nearly naked 24/7
>>730903745tifa is still the worst on this list by miles
Toriyama was such a horny bastard, I'm glad he blessed us with great games and anime instead of making porn full time (although that would have been good too I guess)
>>730904765Covered by the second to last point here >>730903659
>surely it'll work this timedqCHADS are not going to fall for getting involved in your culture war griftsorry it's just not happening
>>730905679It is just... okay to censore!
Censorship is only carried out by governing bodies. A private corporation can't censor their own product. That's just artistic restriction. Use the terminology right.
>>730905679dqcucks buy censored slop with cut features, "chads" indeed>>730906389it's self-censorship
>>730906389Only lefties have to redefine words to win arguments Anon.
>>730906890fuck off
Not buying.
>>730903745This is just sad. SE is so lost. The "ethics department" needs to go. We need to stop making up these fake jobs for women in the workforce too; all they do is ruin shit with their awful ideas and bitterness.
>>730906389>artistic restrictionStfu. No one is going to say this. Stop being a faggot. It's censorship.
>>730902997Why are you comparing concept art to in-game model? You would only be comparing same to same if you weren't a culture war tourist fag.
>>730902997It's not even the same face, personality, or pose
>>730905427The fortune teller is the most tragic one. They literally gave her spandex spats in a fucking fantasy medieval setting
As a reminder, blame CERO, not some made up internet culture war boogeyman.
>>730909010>censorship apologism for corporate greedSad!
>>730909534I blame Square Enix for not telling Cero to go fuck themselves. And so would you if you weren't brown of skin.
>>730909710>Piss off the ratings board in their primary market.Yeah sure that's a wonderful idea.
>>730902997The biggest crime here is that they ruined her face. What the fuck is that thing on the right?
I for one respect Square Enix.
>>730909953We actually might have a line or two already!
>Censored and garbage localizationGlad sales are down and only getting lower.
>>730903321How is this, and 1+2 remake? Are they good or just another meme remake that misses the point of the originals?
>>730911065DQ1>constant cutscenes>constant unbalanced boss fights>even more constant cutscenes>tons of added fluffDQ2>forced fourth party member>forced linearity>constant cutscenesDQ3>censored out the ass>half the side content is missing>constant cutscenes>tons of unnecessary fluffBasically a complete waste of time
>>730903321Now post the sales numbers for 1&2
>>730911307Are the cutscenes just random nonsense to artificially pad out the story, or are they actually well thought out and expand on the plot? Because I've heard they're pretty good, especially with DQ2.
>>730911389They're good if you think games that don't actually have stories need hours of talking in them
>>730911483Well like I said, it depends. If they actually managed to make a good story out of the original trilogy, I'm on board. If most of it just feels like rambling filler and doesn't matter too much, I'm not interested.
>>730911389Some of the new scenes are alright, I like the final boss gauntlet guys getting their own motivations, but there are also a lot of scenes where the party is just supposed to be bonding I guess, but it comes across as grating mostly.
>>7309104793m day 1 easy.
>>730906389
>>730911389With DQ1 remake a lot of it is padding with the only bit I enjoyed were building on what DQ3 protagonist did after his game. With DQ2 it’s giving the other party members more personality which was enjoyable.
>>730911567The rambling filler is the best part of DQ though
Luckily I don't buy Squareslop.
>>730911307Aren't the bosses only bad in the hardest difficulty?
>>730911389Those cutscenes are adding plot to where there was originally none. Most of it was just trying to ads some continuity between the three games.
Another flop? That makes three in a row.
>>730905679Yeah. Didn't like it, but at least we know even the creators didn't approve the censorship.
>>730905679>griftWho's getting money for it, idiot? And who started it first?
