[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why do they runlike fucking shit why do they emulate like crappppp i don't have a fucking play station it's bad enough Infamous Second Son is outright not playable as are most ps4 games, but even PS3 games give issues with cut audio or low fps or bad graphics

LOok at this shit I CAN'T EVEN SEE THE MOSNTER AND THE GAME RUNS AT 20 FPS WHAT THE FUCKKKKKKKK

Why do pc losers always lose!?? why do console chads get better shit than us??
>>
>>730908598
shouldn't have been born from a poor bloodline, works just fine on my emu machine.
>>
>>730908938

It literally doesn't. It's not a pc thing it's an emulator thing. You should try playing videogames for once in your life.
>>
>>730909091
yeah, whatever poorfag
>>
not going to share specs?
>>
>>730908598
>rpcs3
kek
literally worst one to exist out there and it cant even render audio properly
>>
>>730908598
you're emulating ps3 anon, it'll still take a few years for them to iron out all the kinks
infamous is listed as "ingame" in the rpcs3 compatibility list, meaning its emulation is not goodenuff yet
look for games listed as "playable" and you'll probably get a much better experience (70% of the ps3 library already is, according to the website). That's ofc assuming you have a machine with good specs.
I've been emulating shadow of the colossus, gran turismo 5 and the mgs HD collection on my gaming laptop and they all run at a locked 60 with few/no visual glitches. MGS crashed on me once but that's it.
I'd say get a better machine, look for other games or try other emulators (ps2 and below is basically flawless nowadays, can't recall ever having a problem with it on PC)
here's the list of "playable" games according to the rpcs3 dev team:
https://rpcs3.net/compatibility?type=1&s=1
>>
>>730908598
>why do ps3 games run like shit on Intel HD Graphics?
>>
>>730908598
I was playing Resistance 2 all weekend, skill issue
>>
Honestly they did a miracle for bloodborne, finally got to play it last year. Now im currently playing Dante's inferno on rpcs3 and it runs smoothly
>>
>>730908598
Your pc specs?
>>
why do you have to complain about emulators rather than complain about sony?
do you know how much of a fucking clusterfuck the ps3 is? do you realize how much of a fucking pain in the ass it is to figure out how to get this trash running?

you know the best part? sony doesn't even know either, most of the fucking doc is somehow lost and/or so confidential you can't even access it, even with sony creds, and it gets worse on a pet title basis because for some reason, most of these fucks decided to make their games 'in their own sauce', which leads to having to figure out how to make simple shit that they all use all over again, right back from 0, for every single fucking game
>>
>>730911436
The architecture for PS4 is similar to a PC so emulating is going to be a lot smoother for that console, emulating Bloodborne doesnt say anything about the progress of PS3 emulation
>>
>>730908598
>he has a bad computer
yikes
should have bought 124gb of ram when it was only 40 dollars
>>
File: IMG_2610.jpg (2.52 MB, 4032x3024)
2.52 MB
2.52 MB JPG
Works on my machine

I haven’t used my ps3 in years damn its dirty. I only owned Infamous 2 digitally so heres the first game instead
>>
>>730908598
Infamous 2 was unplayable last time I tried it, but 1 was playable (15 fps). Almost beat it but it wasn't as good as I remembered it. The vampire one was pretty good but I haven't tried to emulate it yet
>>
this is how i feel about emulating shitch games. don't play many but i wanna play Xenoblade but it just feels like shit
>>
>>730908598
yeah rpcs3 is an embarrassing piece of shit
>>
>>730914284
which xenoblade?
>>
>>730914426
XB1 DE
>>
>>730914475
that one worked fine for me, beat it and the DLC
i had a couple issues with XB2 though like the 60fps fucking up the timing thing in combat
>>
>>730910000
>you're emulating ps3 anon, it'll still take a few years for them to iron out all the kinks

A few years? The Playstation 3 came out 21 years ago(2005). I appreciate the emulator developers, but come the fuck on, guys
>>
>>730914563
it's not horrible or anything i'm sure i'd adjust quick but i keep alt+f4ing and going to play something native on pc. i'll end up getting to it eventually
>>
>>730914426
I just put 100 hours into XCX DE and it runs at 100fps at 4k ultrawide on ryujinx, but the shader cache is busted and its very stuttery in NLA
>>
>>730908598
Infamous runs like crap on actual hardware, framerate is low always and probably not far off to 20 fps pretty regularly. Just so you know because i actually played it recently.
>>
File: 1757279390237083.jpg (3.75 MB, 7680x4320)
3.75 MB
3.75 MB JPG
I LOVE EMULATORS
>>
>>730908598
>Why do they runlike fucking shit
abstraction layers forcing your cpu to qct like an entirely different incompatible cpu eat speed. Moreso if you want accuracy
>why do they emulate like crappppp
improper implementation of the translation layer. This shit ain't easy, especially if there's a proprietary chip
>most ps4 games, but even PS3 games give issues
nevermind, I see you were retarded all along
>>
>>730908598
If memory serves me right both Infamous titles do not run well. Slow down would happen if action took place as well
>>
>>730914773
ive had the best luck with Citron
>>
>>730908598
the ps3 ran like shit though
>>
>>730914664
>I appreciate the emulator developers, but come the fuck on, guys
Like I said, according to the devs 70% of the library is already playable (meaning, the game can be played from start to finish without significant glitches, assuming it's running on a decent machine)
even then, yes, a few years. The ps3 architecture was unhinged, so it makes sense a decent emulator took so long to come up. If anything it's a miracle it runs anywhere near as good as it does.
>>
how much is a ps3 even these days? probably not even $100
>>
File: 1740367817936974.jpg (4 MB, 10000x5625)
4 MB
4 MB JPG
>>730916245
Its about merely playing the game, its about playing it in 8k/60fps with no slowdown, stuttering, or dips when it played at sub-720/with an inconsistent ~20fps on native hardware. That's why people choose emulation over just buying a PS3 to replay these games, they want to leverage 2 decades of hardware improvements.
>>
>>730916389
well duh, but if the compatibility isn't there and progress isn't exactly quick...
>>
>>730908598
They've left Infamous as it was since like 2020, but the rest is you just being really, really braindead. We don't care about you. Just leave and play your allegedly superior consoles.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.