[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3855.png (9 KB, 320x320)
9 KB
9 KB PNG
It’s time to admit it but they saved the fallout franchise. Not only did they save it from the brink of fading to obscurity but it gave us Fallout 3, New Vegas, 4, 76, a kino tv show and now a vault game show.
>>
>>730909552
obsidian saved it, not them, obviously
>>
Franchise lmao shut the fuck up you Sissy. Cocksucking Ass to Mouth Shitsucking Nigger.
>>
>>730909552
No. They didn't even resume development of Van Buren. They just butchered it by FPS'ing it.
>>
1. Fallout Van Buren/Fallout 3/Some sort of Fallout would have been made at some point even if Bethesda did not buy the IP. Would it have been as commercially successful as creating an elder scrolls skin and selling it to their already large audience? no.
2: How commercially successful a single player game is has literally zero bearing on my perception of it, and enjoyment thereafter. Does them making lots of money and selling lots of copies conflicts with making a well written, immersive, and deep role playing game? Yes.
>>
>>730909628
Frfr



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.