[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: n64 and gamecube.jpg (254 KB, 2500x1105)
254 KB
254 KB JPG
>release more powerful hardware than Playstation
>release it cheaper than playstation
>only both times it has an Achilles heel with it's media. (N64 cartridges and Gamecube mini dvd's) that cannot hold nearly as much as a Playstation
>Because of this games look worse because devs have to use worse textures, sound worse because devs have to cut back music tracks and often times don't get games at all because those games wouldn't have fit

Seriously Nintendo did this twice? Why? Are they idiots?
>>
Textures ruined gayming
>>
File: ps2 vs gc vs xbox.jpg (241 KB, 1680x950)
241 KB
241 KB JPG
>>
>>732278534
Some gamecube multiplats looked brighter than their other counterparts like this and Aggressive Inline



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.