How bad does your game have to be to get a 1?
>>732283358As bad as modern pokemon but without pokemon in the title
>>732283358First, /v/ must like it.
>>732283639>/v/ must like it
>he didn't pay the bribe ending
>>732283358Must be unplayable, non-sensical, unstable, and not on my favorite game's store.
>>732283358I don't think we will see a 1/10 from IGN ever from this point on. their reviews are an extension of marketing and hype. this is why games like vanilla cyberpunk got good press despite being a fundamentally broken product at the time.
>>732283358You can't get that low on badness alone.You have to politically offend the reviewer too
>>732283358Actually broken and unfinished. Like the devs gave up.
It would have to be more than broken. A broken game could possibly still be fun, but a broken game that is boring is a complete waste of time.
>>732283358made for chuds
>>732283358it must be racist and transphobic
>>732283358Be ideologically dissenting. You could make genuinely good game, but of your opinions differ from their platform, you will get 1.
>>732283639>First, /v/ must like it.So, Doom eternal?
