>demo gameplay looks great>faithful artstyle>old battle sim elements retained, like individual officer morale>includes all XL content>new stage(s?) added>Nice QoL additions like being able to change attack directions & sub-officers being displayed on the map>Confirmed toggle options for disabling QoL/"modern" additions>local coop confirmedAnd to think so many dynasty bros doubted they'd do a good job with the The DW3 Remaster.
>>732360306How was the Origins DLC?
>>732362870excellent battles, new weapons, outfits and new skills are all nice, but overall not enough content for the asking price unless you really liked origin's gameplay. I think getting it on 30%+ sale would be a safe get.
we eating good dw3 bros
>>732362761Any zhu rong yet?
>>732366556Not that I've seen. They'll probably post that reveal on all socials for uh, reasons.
>>732360306Have they added Chen Xueyuang yet?
That's nice and all... BUT I was DW5 remade AND ALSO a new empires for DWO
>>732360306looks soulless and the enemies are way less agressive so they clearly fucked with it on a core level and can therefore fuck off
>>732368517They've heavily implied they'll be doing more if dw3:r sells well. I'd assume DW4:R would come out after Origins part 2, then DW5:R after Origins Part 3. Don't think they could do an Origins empires yet, there's not enough stages or complete officer assets. Maybe after the origins trilogy is complete they will do an empires.
>>732360306>mfw peons are clashingOh baby.
>>732360306right, but it's still dynasty warriors 3, which is objectively worse than 4 and 5. the only reason people hold 3 in regard is because of the massive step up from 2
>>732369753Poorfags with a demo disc
>>7323697534 has shit tiny stages + ramped up allies being annoying crybabies, 5 made peons meaningless. I play them all to this day and still prefer 3.
>>732371207That’s because you’re retarded. 4 clears all of them until 7
>>732365843I'm glad they're doing it first. the peon damage sound + the music was such a nostalgia hit.
