The Scorchers DLC might be in the top DLCs of all time, especially due to the way they integrated the content in the base game. You can play plenty of shitty DLC like Resident Evil 5 Gold or Bioshock Infinite's Burial at Sea which aren't at all integrated with the base game.Story is a complete and utter flatline, but it doesn't matter when some anon pointed this out: Doom 2016 is just with Doom stapled onto it.I was surprised to find out how much of a sequel RAGE 2 actually is though. I remember people complaining about the ending when the game first released, and that's classic shitty id for you -- but RAGE 2 playing into it makes it okay in my books.
>>732677064>he posted it again
Oh and I did the coop achievements with a buddy. I don't know why it's so short. Game should've been campaign coop.Hell, RAGE 2 should've had ANY coop period.
>>732677064Why you repost this thread?What do you gain?
Not enough rageNeed more rage
>>732679341>Game called 'rage' has nothing enraging in it
>there are people in existence who not only liked the piece of shit that was RAGE, but actually feel strongly enough about it to profess their appreciation for it and protest its poor reception more than 15 years after releaseIt's a crazy world out there
>>732677064>textures popping in constantly>ran like complete asshave a free (You)
>>732677708>>732677140Why do you annoying faggots cry about seeing the same thread more than once? Just don't post in it, retard. Never seen such impotent rage on here.
cheevo schizo is working overtime this year
>>732680376>>textures popping in constantlyCarmack was ahead of his time when you look at the slop engines we deal with today.>>ran like complete assIt ran at near constant 60 on 360/PS3, which was deemed near impossible for FPS games that gen.
>>732677064this same exact thread again? I knew this site was mostly bots now but damn
>>732680467When I make a thread. I dont start malding about not having enough bumps that I go back and do the exact same thread tomorrow. Why cant every be straight and white like me?
>>732680467>please validate me, it took me so long to have a thought of my ownpathetic