[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images.jpg (7 KB, 259x194)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
are the soul reaver remasters good? Which SR is the better game?
>>
>>733638346
They are all kinda bad, gameplay-wise, but the first one is still the best one
>>
>>733638346
> are the soul reaver remasters good?
They are as good as remasters can be.
> Which SR is the better game?
The first game is easily the best one. The atmosphere, light metroidvana elements and bosses just make it fundamentally a better “game” than 2 and defiance feels like a bad DMC clone.
>>
>>733638346
The first Soul Reaver is basically gothic Ocarina of Time like how Blood Omen was gothic A Link to the Past. Soul Reaver 2 is way more linear with no side content but a way bigger and better emphasis on the story.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.