[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


What mental illness do you need to believe Super Mario 64 is better than these?
>>
>>733643398
You can beat SM64 by playing exclusively the good levels. You cannot beat either SA1 or SA2 without wading through liquified shit.
>>
>>733643398
I can actually control my jumps in Super Mario 64
>>
>>733643398
>posted it again award
>>
>>733643538
>filtered by treasure hunting
>>
>>733643398
There's no such thing as a good Sonic game. Fucker killed the Dreamcast with those shitty games.
>>
Super Mario 64 was an actually good game. Both Sonic adventure games were mediocre shovelware.
>>
>>733643398
Super Mario 64 is definitely "better" than these two, but these two are far more interesting.
>>
>>733648908
Not his fault Sonic Team couldn't design a good treasure hunt.
>>
>>733643398
>Thinks SLOPnic Adventure 2 is better than Mario 64
>>
>>733643398
OP here

Asking for a friend.
>>
>>733643398
level design



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.