>AI can generate fully rigged, retopod, skinned characters in 10 minuteswhy are you not making your dream game?
>Retopod
>>733664373Because I'm an uncreative right-wing chud.
>>733664373>make a game with AI>have to put "I used AI" in the steam page>nobody buys the game
>>733664471it deforms fine.>>733664582not on the only market that matters(consoles)
Resident schizo thread
>>733664373Wich ai?
>>733664721smelltard ai 5.6
How safe are 3D artists from AI? If this is the kind of work they can make, I think we’re safe. I’m sure the shareholders in AAA could look at the savings they make when they lower their standards to this kind of quality, but who wants to work in AAA?Even if it somehow starts making good topologizes models, you have to properly UV unwrap it, texture it, rig and weight paint it. I’m not one of those people who thought AI drawings couldn’t get to the level of quality that we see now, but the job of making a 3D asset for rich furries who want a new avatar seems like a job that AI can’t really do for the next decade
>>733664373Because character models are like 10% of the work, now you have to animate them, do voices, come up with an actual story etc. Like 90% of the work is the level and actual game.
>>733664582>lie
>>733665237nothing digital is safe at this point.>>733665376then why does indieslop still have extremely basic shape characters. levels are ez in a singleplayer game. most of the time it';s just a fucking cube you plop a material on and that's it. anything more complex and you can generate it with AI.
>>733664471triple A hacks are using CG tier models but you motherfucker yap about muh retopo.
>copypaste an existing model>claim ai made itDo you even get paid for this? Or do you just advertise for ai shartup funding rounds for free?
>>733666501haven't advertised a single thing you retarded chud.
>>733664373AI can't motivate me.
>>733664373Show the legs and the back. The model is ugly enough, I wanna see what you're hiding from the camera.
>>733667056
I don't think thumbs are supposed to bend that way
>>733667217Good fucking lord what happened here?I'm not even going to comment on what's happening on the right there
>>733667224it's a hack to not get the fingers weld. could've used a clawgrip pose I guess. doesn't matter.
>>733666430This model is miles ahead in quality
>>733667330doesn't matter. thighs barely deform.
>>733666430Why are there so many verts in the eyelashes?
>>733664639>only market that matters>ConsolesNigga it's not 2008 anymore
>>733667420at this point devs are just using geometry for them. why the fuck not when it's so easy to push polys.
>>733667445just publish on console first, gain recognition then drop the truth nuke when you publish on steam.
>>733667470It's gonna run like shit for a minor detail that can look just as good with less.
>>733667379This response really has cemented to me that the only people who would accept trash like that are grifters trying to make an easy buck off AI tools because they don't have any talent of their own.
>>733664373>>AI can generate fully rigged, retopod, skinned characters in 10 minutesAnd do what? Walk around in a mostly uninteractive environment, making dialogue choices? Amazing. You should become the next Xbox CEO. Make sure to never look at any internal metrics on how many players largely skip dialogue in games. Wouldn't want to upset the vision.
>>733667597nah. cards will always suck compared to actual strands/geometry. anyway, it's a cutscene model and the cutscenes in that game are extremely high fidelity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2T0MKbhLGE>>733667606>muh talent when every little thing has a plugin or an add on to streamline it.this is the culmination of everything 3D artists have embraced.
>>733664582Only faggots from Blue Sky will avoid game
>>733667729Don't see how that doesn't make you a grifter. Go model something people will actually use instead of presenting me with garbage only talentless hacks will accept.
>>733667979there's no point in creating anything digiital in the near future. the only value be in real experiences. true artists that can pick up guitars or draw live will be the ones admired. no more midi crap in the mainstream.
>>733668114Saar is coping out of his mind trying to weasel into an industry that won't accept him
>>733664373>this thread againI came here to laugh at you
>>733667979Nobody cares about le grifting, faggot.They only care if the game is FUN. Eventually, AI slop will equal human slop in the fun factor and the most pretentious of Gamers™ will have to accept that fact.
>make a gameI would just have it generate several big titty furry women to look at.
I just use premade assets
>>733668494anyone else can use your premade assets you cuck.
>>733668417You know what? You're probably right.I remember when games weren't riddled with metric asstons of microtransactions, gambling, and DLCs designed to drain the customer's wallets. Now they're everywhere.There's gonna be a lot more lifeless garbage out there, which is already kinda sad considering how much lifeless garbage there is now.
>>733668574AI is even more cucked. As you just need to set up your LLM and you can perfectly copy it.
>>733664582just don't put it.
>>7336652373D Artist here, veryThe thing is that 3D art takes a LOT of autistic dedication to learn and work with an assload of programs, plugins, scripts and other shit. They want to get stuff done as lazily and fast as possible but with clean results. The problem right now is that AI devs are always trying to skip the process and go for instant results and that shit doesnt work. The models are too ass and are painful to fix and most of the time theres already either a gajillion similar existing models to pick from the market or indians who will do a better job cheaper.Stylized ai 3d art sucks because its both slop and inconsistent.Theres two things where the money is at though. A) include ai in tedious processes like UV mapping or rigging. Theres a lot of potential there but ai devs are still too greedy to go for "simple tools" B) ai alone wont be the solution, a mix of both will be. A solution for commercial renderings will be a mix of a simple 3d scene which ai will polish, there are already workflows where you build a basic scene in unreal and then let ai polish it. The 3d scene will make sure that theres consistency which ai sucks at and will also make sure that angles are right.But whichever way is going to be successful, artists will rule it. Not because of their learned skill, but for their autistic dedication to adapt workflows and doing sick shit with it. An artist who can do ai will always outperform a rando who can do ai, its all in their obsession of creating stuff (and the self-loathing).1/2
>>733671843The artists who are in danger are those who just enjoy specific workflows and dont want to adapt/learn new thing, but those are lost anyways, ai or not.Tl;dr artists main weapon is dedication to practice and learn things no matter what tool, ai will just be another tool
