What's the first game you will play after getting this monitor?
KH:CoM on the GBA
>not 4kit's shit
>>733687574imouto paradise. it's a paradise... of imoutos. if you get what i mean. wink wink. in japan that's what they call little sisters. now everyone has those, but in japanese media, they do them a little differently if you catch my drift. a little handsier heh heh. that's what i'll be playin. and let's just say it wouldn't be with both hands on my peripherals. except for my own peripheral. wink wink.
>>733687574>not even 4ksad
4k 27in or 32in?
>>733687742>>733687870>>733687897N-NOT A MEME? WHERE IS THE MEME? I NEED TO PLAY ON MEME????
>>733687960My favourite meme is "Hawk Tuah." I find it very humorous and laugh a lot at it. What is yours?
>>7336875744k240Hzanything else can fuck off
Why do you need so many Hz
>>73368789732inAs someone who's used both, the extra space really makes a difference with immersion and/or information density (you can get away with smaller UI scaling)
>>733688182Look at a helicopter's rotor.
>720hzfor what purposethere's genuinely no noticeable difference past 250hz or so, and even then, 120hz vs anything above that is barely noticeable to begin with
>>73368789732 for sure
>>733688306Look at a helicopter's rotor.
>>733688306e-sports fags are like audiophiles
>>733688383just to look at helicopters rotors?
>>733688462Yeah.
>>733688496based helicopter enthusiast
My monitor goes up to 180 but I leave it at 120 because I'm paranoid it'll die faster.
anyone got any recs for a dual monitor setup? I got 800 total to blow
>>733687574>Pushing more bandwidth when they don't even have a video cable that can display it without being cucked by DSC What's the point
>>733687960Sorry you're poor
>>733687574There is no reason to have a refresh rate that is higher than your framerate which means that there is an upper practical limit of around 120Hz beyond which you are paying for something you will literally never use.
>>733689386Sorry you have to upgrade every two years except you can't do that anymore because there's nothing to upgrade to, really good time to invest in 4k gaming
>>733689663Buy better hardware so you can look at the rotors at 540 fps.
>>733689993Most games do 60fps on a good day. 120fps if it's ancient and you have a strong modern system. More than than and you're playing fucking Pong or something. You will literally never ever have a game running at 720 FPS or even close to it thus 720 Hz is useless.
>>733689936Because publishers are making games for hardware that doesn't exist...
>>733688306higher than 200 hz refresh rates have basically no use case except shooters imo. but for shooters you have to get up to ridiculous refresh rates before it truly feels "smooth"
>>733690115Most games that have ever been released can reach those framerates just fine on modern hardware.
I got a 4k projector instead. You should too.
i upgraded to a 24 inch 1080p 120hz IPS monitor and it has dead pixels and really bad ips glow
>>733690285Unless you are playing literally OG Pong your game will never reach 720fps. 200fps absolute upper limit and in reality you're not even reaching triple digits. If you are buying a monitor with more than 200Hz you are literally just paying for a bigger number because the number is bigger not because it actually has any effect on visual quality.
>>7336903931080p at 120Hz is really all you need so long as it works.
>>733690410There are a lot of games released between Pong and modern AAA shit. Those numbers aren't unrealistic for modern hardware on most games.
>>733690393Shoulda upgraded to a 1080p 120hz projector.
I've been using a 1920 X *1200* screen for over a decade, I don't know if that was more prevalent way back when but now it seems practically non-existent so I had to go to a 1440p for my new one just to not be downgrading
>>733690393>upgraded to a 1080p monitorHoly fucking shit this board is filled with poorfags
>>733687742>just kill half your framerate even on a 5090I want to max out all the path tracing and graphical stuff while keeping a steady 144fps
I upgraded to a $1000 600hz 24" 1080p monitor with a TN panel so I can look at YouTube videos with dyac
A bigger monitor with a higher refresh rate needs a beefier GPU to run a game at 4k 720fps. In fact even the strongest GPU you can buy can't run anything even remotely modern at that resolution and speed. Beyond a certain point you can't even reasonably tell the difference any more so in practical terms the best monitor that is even worth buying is 1440p @ 240Hz with 1080p @ 120Hz being absolutely fine for 90% of people.
>>733687574>540hz-720hzWhat the fuck is even the point? What are you EVER going to be playing at 720fps? Counter-Strike 1.6 on a 5090?
>>733692360Exactly.
>>733690830Show me a single "modern game" from the last 5 years (not indie lo-fi shit like Mewgenics, or w/e) that can even hit 300fps on a 5090, I'll wait.
>>733692519There have been a lot of games released between Pong and 5 years ago. Why disregard them?
>poorfags still using the same 1080p resolution from 20 years agoROFL
>>733691938>$1000>24"LMAO>>733692971>He doesn't know everything is designed for 1080p>He thinks anything above 1080p is mainstream in anyway except wider phone screensLMAOOOO
>>733687574OLED monitors are bad. Get a lg c5 42 instead.
>>733687742>they hated him for he spoke the truthThe answer is NFSii.
>>733692971>Pay many thousands for a GPU that can run a game at 4k and >30fps at more than minimum settings or pay a few hundred for one that can run the same game at 1080p, max settings otherwise at >60fps
1440p is the GOD resolution>gives you more screen estate without scaling issues>no performance hit from 1080 because resolution is high enough to let you make good use of DLSS>not as demanding as 4k
>>733691320not even brownoids like me this poor
>>733687574Tetris
>>733694182Unless your monitor is the size of your wall then the actual jump in visual quality beyond 1080p is minor while requiring much beefier hardware to push that many pixels at more than slideshow speeds.
>>73369428927 inch is a common monitor size and 1080 looks like shit on it
>>733694289>>733694607The most important metric when it comes to visual quality on screen is pixels per inch (ppi). 800 ppi is the point past which you can't really tell the difference any more. The screen's ppi is a function of its resolution and physical size with very large screens of low resolution having a low ppi and vice versa.For easy reference the screen sizes and resolutions that equal 800ppi are:1080p 27 inches1440p 36 inches4K 54 inches
>>733687850what did he mean by this?
>>733694657whoops, meant 80, not 800.
>>733690232doesn't really matter if the server is 60Hz tick, if not less
>>733687574This is the monitor you should have bought.1440p 27 inch OLED @240Hz and 0.03ms response time.
>>733687574I'd refund it, 16:9 is retarded in 2026.
>they fell for the oled meme
>>733693767>scaling issuesHuh? Its 720p x 2. Of course there's scaling issues when everything is designed for 1080p now.
hope you got it from a place where you can return it. biggest piece of shit ive ever used.
>>733697448Everything is designed for 16:9, anon. 16:10 and Ultrawide retards need to stop tricking people. Its better to have two 16:9 screens with no window problems than 1 Ultrawide that has no support on most software. However for music or video production ultrawide is great.
>>733689086Not even enough for 1 good monitor
>>733692360>Counter-Strike 1.6 on a 5090?What else is there to play?
No thanks, I'm a miniledGOD.
>>733698731>4K 27inchThis is the monitor you buy simply to spend more money on your PC without it really producing much benefit. If you are going 4K you should at least also get a big monitor to really take advantage of it, like 36 inches at least.
>>733687574DooM 2
>>733699050>4k 36"Nice, the ppi of a 27" 1440p display
>>733693197I like NFS III better
>>73368789740" is the absolute minimum. You wouldn't use a 13.5" or a 16" 1080p, why would you use their equivalents for 4k?
>>733699181>t.blindfuck
>>733699137Yeah about that. There are diminishing returns after a point and 4K at 27" is past that I think so if you are going to have huge resolution you might as well also have a big screen so you can actually see a tangible difference.
>>733699228I'm sorry that you don't think you can see the difference. I'm also at my desk, I'm not buying a fucking TV. I hate consoleniggers.
>>733694657No, PPI is meaningless without distance, which means PPD is all that matters. 60 PPD is the standard. PPI is better around 90-100, which gives you a better distance to monitor. If you have a long desk, then sure, put it more than 3 feet away and buy a lower PPI display.>>733699196Look up here at >>733688273. The important term here is "smaller UI scaling". At NO point should you EVER use scaling on a monitor. Well, okay, when you have a monitor that completely fills your field of vision, then there's nowhere left to go but scaling, but we're talking about 80"+ there, and resolutions in excess of 12k, which nothing can run.
>>733699271You can't really. There is a much more noticeable benefit to 4K at 36" vs 27" than there is between 1440p and 4K both at 27".
I got the mpg 341cqpx with my new 5070ti build. Coming from a 1080p lcd on a gtx 1660 is a decent upgrade. Had to tinker with the settings a bit though as it was overly saturated on default settings.
>>733699492Looks pretty good. How is the ultra wide? Does it cause problems at all?
>>733699581It's 1800r so the curve is not noticible at all, haven't noticed any problems with the vidya I've played anyway.. I think the first 5kx2.8k oleds just released too if you got the cash and hardware for it.
>>733699836Will keep it in mind. Thanks.
You don't need thatYou are a lying ass fucking retard if you say you can see a different above 240Hz, fuck off
>>733699150both gud
I got this and the first game i played was tf2. Unfortunately most games can't hit more than like 350hz no matter how good your computer is. However, the few games that can the motion clarity of 540 or 720hz is absolutely insane.
>>733693197Based AW3225QF user
>>733692360How I know you're a larper. 1.6 is capped at 100 FPS and always has been.
>>733700763curved for her pleasure
>>733688306Wrong. At about 1000hz you get CRT-like motion clarity. Even if the content is only running at 60 fps. We need to go further, until 1000hz oled is the standard.
>>733687574did this monitor come out a decade ago or something? nobody uses resolutions that low anymore
>>733701102LMAO oled is dead, gsync pulsar is better at all refresh rates so a 240hz pulsar screen is equivalent to a 500hz oled if not more.
>>733699050the 4k is there for dlss. dlss on 1440p is garbage. going to 4k is increasing the quality by 4x, while performance is practically the same.
>>733701193Retarded coping poorfag. Pulsar is a stepping stone technology. It makes a lower hz look like higher hz by flickering the screen. Its objectively inferior to just increasing the hz, and it will disappear panels get fast enough natively. Enjoy your headaches and edgebloom
>>733701269>going to 4k is increasing the quality by 4x, while performance is practically the same.Performance is like cut by a third by going from 1440p to 4k
>>733701269The point is that past a certain point you can't even see the difference and the smaller the screen is the even less difference there is to notice. 27" is at the small end of monitors so 4K on it is just spending shitloads on a monitor and the powerful hardware you need to then run it at that resolution for not a lot of extra visual fidelity. If you are going 4K then you should also do it on a big monitor or even a projector so you can blow it up big. If you only want a 27" monitor because that's all you can reasonably fit on your desk or something then 1440p is more than enough and you don't need as chunky a GPU to run it well at that resolution either.
>540HZmental illness
>>733701496>oled coper lashes out in rage
>>733701537nah it's still only rendering 1080p, yeah it will be lower than 720p but you're not going to notice it at all
>>733687574Ive been using the 480 woled for a year or so and would recommend cs2 and deadlock. Framegenned singleplayer is ok too.
>>733701562i just told you the point is for dlss. you've obviously never had both a 1440p and a 4K at the same size so why are you talking like you know what youre talking about.
>>733701724DLSS doesn't change anything that's just fancy upscaling. You still can't actually see with your eyes much improvement from 4K over 1440p at 27". If you want to do 4K, with or without DLSS, then you should do it on a big screen to get the full benefit.
All oleds use cheap pulse wave brightness modulation which causes eye strain, it's junk tech for the ignorant peasantry I switched from a pwm monitor to a dc monitor and my eyes are never bloodshot anymore, I'll never use that trash again
>>733701787there you go talking like you know what the fuck you're talking about when you clearly don't. yeah i just told you dlss on 1440p looks like fucking shit, it looks like blurry 720p upscaled to 1440p. meanwhile dlss on 4k looks like 4k. you're a fucking weirdo.
>>733701787I use 1440p because i value higher fps bit you must be retarded if you think you cant see a difference between 1440p and 4k on a 27”.
>>733701562That is absolute fucking bullshit parroted by retards, at 27 inches a 4k monitor has like 50% more pixel density so pretending you don't see it is a fucking lie. Larger monitors are worthless, the "immersion" people get is from sitting too goddamn close so the monitor feels like it's wrapping around them like a child sitting too close to a TV.
>>7337017874k is a huge improvement over 1440 even on 27". you haven't seen 4k on 27" or you are blind
>All this cope to justify their useless purchase of a 27" 4K monitor that they need to spend thousands on a PC to run that isn't even much improvement over a machine half the price
>>733701619You're basically arguing that DLSS looks better than DLAA. Pure poorfag cope.
>>733701589Dementia boomer
>>733701936>boomer doesnt know what DLSS is in 2026
>>733701852>All oleds use cheap pulse wave brightness modulationBlatantly false.
>>733702078If you want to do 4K then go big or go home. If you want to go budget GPU then don't even bother with it. You will get far more out of your hardware doing it at 1440p or even 1080p.
>>733687574We need 1000Hz for realistic CRT shaders:https://blurbusters.com/crt-simulation-in-a-gpu-shader-looks-better-than-bfi/
>>733702151The whole point of DLSS is you can get a 5070 ti and play at 4K, 5090's aren't meant to be purchased by anyone that's why they're retardedly overpriced and set on fire. And a 5070 ti sure as fuck isn't a budget GPU in the first place, only in dumbshit clown world is that true.
>>733702297A 5070 Ti can do 4K natively. DLSS is for shittier cards to let them fake 4K at a reasonable frame rate.
>>733702297dude is obviously from india
>>733702339Yeah no, there's no such thing as native 4K, every game is using deferred rendering. You don't even know what DLSS is lol.
>>733702384Of course there is. It's just a matter of rendering a larger image. DLSS is for things like the Switch to let basically a phone do something that before only an actual PC could do at more than a slide show.
>>733702118Cuck cope
>>733702417No, there is no such thing as native 4K as I said you fucking moron. Nothing is rendered which is why it's called DEFERRED RENDERING. How fucking stupid are you?
>>733702483Any card can technically do 4k it will just be at like 2fps unless it's top of the line.
>>733702510IT'S NOT GOING TO LOOK LIKE 4K YOU FUCKING IDIOT BECAUSE IT'S DEFERRED RENDERING. HOW FUCKING DUMB ARE YOU HOLY SHIT. LAST REPLY. IM LITERALLY LOSING BRAIN CELLS TALKING TO YOU DIPSHIT
>>733702589It will literally be an image of the dimensions 3840x2160. There is noting special about that number it just takes more horsepower to process than a smaller image does. All DLSS does is let you render a smaller image and then upscale it to 4K at a decent framerate. A top of the line card can just render at that size to begin with.
>>733702645Render at a reasonable framerate at that size I should say.
>>733702645Obvious jeet astroturferI will not buy njudea, seethe dilate cope
>>733702707>total schizobabble
>>733702483That's not what it means. Deferred rendering just means the lighting is rendered separate from the geometry. There's no reason it can't do 4K. But deferred rendering breaks MSAA, so people switched to TAA which looks like blurry shit whatever you do, so you might as well upscale for fake resolution too.
>>733702727Jeet seethes while angrily gulping down a cow dung after getting called out
>>733687574HoMM 3
>>733702732No, it's literally deferred rendering rendering with dithering so you literally cannot see the image native unless you use temporal anti aliasing. Like there is nothing there to see.
>>733702952It's a specific technique for optimizing lighting that lets you cull unimportant lights per-pixel. The dithering is just a side effect, you could do SSAA instead if you didn't give a shit about performance.
>>733703007The dithering is implied or else no one would be using deferred rendering in the first place.
>>733703079Obviously, because the whole point of deferred rendering is performance. SSAA would negate the advantage. But there's nothing inherent in deferred rendering that forces it. >>733702483 shows you don't understand how it works. The only thing that's deferred is lighting calculations.
>>733694719“Imouto” (妹) is a Japanese word meaning “younger sister.” It refers specifically to a female sibling who is younger than the speaker. The counterpart is “onee-san” (older sister) and “otouto” (younger brother). In anime, manga, and visual novels, “imouto” is often used directly in dialogue when addressing or referring to a younger sister. In modern parlance, "imouto" has become synonymous with the word "onahole." Hope this helps.
>>733687574>1440pI would use that monitor to browse the internet while searching for a good 4k monitor
>>733702589Are you trolling or have you confused concepts this bad? It being deferred rendering has notging to do with the rendering resolution
the original freeware version of Spelunky
I'm fine with a 60hz vsync...
>>733702952Do you even know what rendering resolution is? Neither deferred rendering, TAA, nor dithering, affects the rendering resolution. Small detailed things like hair look pixelated as fuck, devs used to handle this with msaa + smaa/fxaa. You cant do msaa with deferred rendering so devs started using weird tricks with dithereing + TAA/DLSS to make it look at least ok
>>733687742>Boot up any game before 2016>UI scales like absolute shitWhat now faggot?
>>733704007Any game you say?
>>733704007>>Boot up any game before 2016mine look ok? What is it you think will happen?
>>733704861lmao
>>733687574I would get a refund and get a 4k IPS instead
i dont mind splurging on a monitor but i dont want oled burn inis the best technology just IPS for around $300?
>>733705040>IPS user displays pure black image
