What game has the best minion system?
I think I could take a gorilla in a fight
>>733707001I pick gorillas twice. Because I love gorillas. Don't care if I die; I get to hang out with gorillas.
>>733707028Go back
5 harambes and 3 bears can take anyone there, assuming they follow me, listen to me and work together. if not, I still pick them but it won't be a flawless victoryseems like the best friends there too, the 15 wolves are cool too but I'd rather have the others
>>733707112
>>733707001I think you need to pick the 50 eagles for aerial coverage, remember, if you don't, they will be attacking you. After that it's between the lions, gorillas or bears.
>>733707001My guess is that 7 oxes and 3 bears can kill the rest but what do I know
>>73370700110,000 rats sounds busted as fuck, especially if they feel like they have a purpose of protecting me. At worst, they can cover everything else up and suffocate them like bees and murder hornets.Also take Hawks because they're really the only thing that could kill the rats, and most things can't defend against the,.
>>733707134>dont pick the rats>atleast half of the rats beeline past the animals defending you straight to youSetting yourself up for failure ngl
>>733707028I wish you would record yourself trying and have someone post it to the internet so that we can put this matter to rest once and for all.
>>733707001GIVE ME TWENTY THOUSAND RAT FRIENDS
>>733707001rat and birb, nothing can kill an army
>>733707001I take the 50 eagles and 7 buffaloes
>>733707001If you get to choose the arena the guy with the gun is OP. He might even pay you for the chance to kill exotic animals.
I'll take the 50 eagles, 10.000 rats and run like fuck
>>733707001guy with a gun beats strong animals > strong animals beat mid tier groups > mid tier groups beat weak hordes > weak hordes beat single guy with gun
People passing up the bull are dumb af.Only bears will give them trouble, and if they charge at the same time the bears would be mince meat.
>>733707391The problem is that the rats and the birds are basically unblockable
>>733707001Pikmin (and its derivative Overlord)Diablo II (necromancer)
>>733707434Against a bull running around the rats wouldn't have time to even latch on i feel like, they would all be getting stomped to death.
>>733707001Bears and the rats. The bears are personal guards. The rats are for making Willard look like an amateur. The bulls are a big maybe over the bears. Bovines are bullshit strong in their own right and those horns are nasty if they could cover each other with the above average numbers for their size.
>>733707434Bull hide is thick af. Don't know much about rats, but I dont think they could pierce the skin with a glancery bite from a bull in motion. They need time to break through skin.
>>733707001You need the hunter and the rats, otherwise they'll kill you easily The hunter can just snipe you and the animals can't do shit about itThe rats can can make a beeeline for you and devour you and the hunter can't stop them unless he has a flamethrower, and the other animals can't stop them eitherSo hunter and rats it is, they can easily take care of everything else
>>73370700150 Hawks and 3 Bears.>20 Hawks will be assigned to kill the rats>3 Hawks distract the Hunter while 1 bear mauls him>Rest of the Hawks still turmoil on the other animals distracting them>The other 2 bears will protect you from any attacksYou need the Hawks because of the Flight advantage.
>>733707001Eagles and rats. Get the eagles to fly me to safety on top of a tall building while the rats focus on distracting the hunter and hopefully gouge his eyes out or something. I win.
>>733707001Are we talking Black Plague, ravenous, tick infested, and starving rats to protect me? Or rats that scurry and eat floor pizza? The stats on those two are very different.
>>733707001>Human>RatsI'd have picked the Gorillas, but 10,000 fucking rats is brutal.
>>73370700110000 mice and 5 gorillas covers every base.>>733707210i'd like to see an eagle (its a hawk) get within attacking distance of the gorilla and deal any amount of damage without eatting shit in the process
>>733708440>Humangenuinely the worst option there.Wont do shit against 50 hawks or 15 wolves. He'll take down a few before being outnumbered once they close the distance. Hawks especially since the rats can't even help him in that instance
>>733707028yes anon, I believe in you! make sure to post the video later!
>>733707134>don't pick hunter>he shots you from afar>don't pick rats>a few thousand of them will get to you and eat you aliveYou are stupid if you really didn't think of these two scenarios.
>>733707001I have to take the hawks for aerial coverage and superiority, but all the land ones suck for protection. Are 10k rats enough rats for me to dive in the pile and hide myself in?
>>733707001for this to be interesting in any capacity, the rats should be removed. They are broken both ways, completely op as attackers, so you have to pick them, but absolutely useless as defenders.
>>733711226true, but as an attacker he has to shot only one target, and that is you. So you have to pick him just to not have him as an enemy. Rats have the same problem, bad defenders but too powerful as attackers, so you have to pick them. Whoever came up with that little thought experiment should never be responsible for game balance.
>>733707001I take 10000 rats and construct the mighty Ratatron Armor to surround myself with. No need for a second.
>>733711152>50 eagles>2 feet each>4 claws per foot400 of these things divebombing you and your overgrown monkey at 100mph
>>73370700110k rats could solo everything there, 50 hawks could get the hunter quickly.the best minion systems are in pikmin and overlord. you get the satisfaction of turning dead enemies into more minions like necromancy. And while you can easily replace both, they are not truly expendable and you should watch out for them as they watch out for you.the best ones are blue minions and ice pikmin
>>733707001Grizzly bears and ten thousand rats, hands down.
>>733712105no, you pick the eagles to nullify the hunter. see >>733712238
>>733712251grizzlies are a solid choice as nothing on that list can stop them. but picking those two still leaves you to deal with 50 eagles while the bears and rats take out everything else
>>733707720How are 20 hawks going to stop 10.000 rats?
>>733707001I think gorillas and rats is objectively the best choice
>>733712280>no, you pick the eagles to nullify the hunter.can't he just pick a spot far away and snipe you? How are you commanding your eagles to attack him specifically? Are they somehow intelligent enough to identify that lone guy somewhere in the distance as a threat to you on their own? What if it works the other way around: Not your eagles distracting the hunter, but all the other charging animals distracting your eagles? Do your defenders even listen to commands? What about the rats? Nothing on that list will stop them when they attack you, but as defenders they won't have the stopping power to prevent 3 bears, 5 gorillas and 7 charging bulls from reaching you. They can kill anything on that list due to their numbers, but as a defender the question becomes can they kill it FAST. Faster than it can reach you.
>>733707001Human and eagles. Abuse hit and run tactics with uncontested scouting from the eagles.
>>733707434Rats can be kited until they die of old age.
>>733707001Only correct answer is to choose the Hunter and the rats. The hunter can kill everything there and most definitely is the most dangerous if not picked (he instantly kills you and none of your defenders will stop him before the bullet hits you) and nothing there has any hope of killing 10,000 rats before the hunter kills all of them.If it was 1-200ish rats then it might be a different story, but 10,000 rats is definitely a tanky enough blob that a hunter can kill 94 other things, most of which will die in 1 shot. birds might even die multiple to a shot.>inb4 but the 50 birds will get youjust crawl around under the rats
>>73370700150 eagles and 10k ratsSOLELY because this means there are less enemies that can surprise me, and rats are super intelligent>Eagles scout, immediately reveal the hunter if he shoots even one of them, so that the rest will make quick work>rats scout the perimeter, making sure NOTHING and absolutely NOTHING will get past them unnoticed>I can camp somewhere with traps and guns, while my minions are too small to ever trigger traps or be mistakingly hit by me>small pecks and bites are bad enough to distract any of the potential attackers long enough to reveal their location to the rest of the gang (and me)It all comes down to whether I get to participate myself, or get to pick the location
>>733707112Where, nigger? I'm homeless.
10k rats is more mass than the rest combinedThe horde would swallow everything else
>>733707479They are supposed to protect you, rats and eagles can just ignore the bears/bulls/gorillas and come murder you. 7 bulls is not stopping 10k rats.
>>733707028Most likely the gorilla will take you, anally.
If there were 1000 rats, they'd be a top pick. But 10x that amount is absolutely absurd.They can quite drown any other option in their body mass. You think you can keep even 100 rats from swarming you and tearing your eyes out? The only thing they don't devour immediately is flying hawks, which is why they're the second choice.
>>733707001Bulls + wolves. 7 tanks and 15 DPS
>>733711226>genuinely the worst option there.It's the first option that matters, because you're not fucking outrunning a bullet. Unless you notice that fucker ahead of time (and can somehow find/create good enough cover to hide yourself behind to avoid getting picked off), have a gun to shoot the fucker yourself, or can psionically manipulate your other dumbass animals into actively searching for and ripping that fucker's throat out, you need to pick him if you want any real chance of living.
>>733716554Does he have enough ammo for everything else on that list though?
>>733716642Last I checked, you typically don't go hunting with no ammo, and even if you assume the 10,000 rats will do literally nothing, having enough for 94 other animals isn't that hard to imagine given many of those animals will go down in a couple of shots at most. Even if you assume he's a retard without ammo you're better off with him because he can help you with making fortifications or traps or gathering food or making fires or whatever the fuck else another intelligent human being that is presumably experienced in surviving in the wilderness might be able to do in a survival situation.
>>733707001I pick the dude with a rifle/shotgun and 10000 mice, hopefully the human won't get his eyes plucked out by the birds.
>>733707001>hunterCan snipe any creature, but gets mogged in melee by any group. If he has a high ground, his chances are much better - though half of the list can still reach him.>eagles and ratsOverwhelm you with sheer numbers, no defense. Being covered with rats hardcounters the eagles, but any other creature may be able to tank all damage yet can't protect you.>bears, lions and gorillasKind of equal, hard to say who wins. I feel that bears>gorillas>lions, but who knows.>wolvesI expect them to job to everyone except maybe oxes and eagles. However>oxesIf they have a prep time, I'm not sure if there's anyone who can tank the stampede. Bears, maybe.>alligatorsJust stay away from the water lmao. Though they can as well deny you water if there're no other sources. On the bright side, you can use them as a boat and only eagles and the hunter can easily reach you.Hunter with a highground + rats seem like the best group overall. Hunter snipes whoever comes close, some rats protect both of you from the eagles, the others distract climbers to give the hunter an opening.The other viable option is alligators + eagles. No one can do the water combat nearly as well, while the eagles can take care of the hunter.
>>733707001I know everyone has the joke answers, but it's obvious to everyone that the meta is one hunter and 50 hawks, right?
>>733707001>choose crocks>go into water with them>you are literally unkillable noweasy. next question
>>733717945Good luck surviving against 10000 rats.
>>733717945Hawks would be the third pick. You are not doing SHIT against 10,000 fucking rats scurrying towards your ass barring lighting a huge ass fire and praying they all burn to death before you do.
>>733718017>>733718007You'd have to be delusional to think the hawks couldn't handle the rats.
>>733718191What happens faster, 50 hawks killing 10,000 rats, or 10,000 rats getting your ass on breakfast?
>>733718191TENTHOUSANDRATSplus a hunter that can just shoot the fuckers out of the airyou're not fucking getting 10k+ bullets off on the rat horde before you die a very gruesome death
>>733718191you might be actually retarded
>>733718323All you have to do is wear some thick clothing and some snow shoes to stomp 'em.>>733718327What hunter is going to be shooting at targets divebombing at 200mph? You'd be fucked if you didn't have the hawks.
>>733718343No, he's just baiting based on that last response.
>>733718484I think you underestimate how big rats can be and how fucking many 10k rats actually is. You're not stomping out 10k of them that easily, especially when you have other shit to worry about at the same time.
>>733718682That's a big rat. Nice to see him lifting up his smaller brethren.
>>733718682Hawks have no counter. Rats just have volume. It'd be tough, but no different than Vampire Survivor.
>>733712118this is some Resident Evil shit
Actually, I think rats hard counter the hunter. He'll be wasting bullets trying to find you, if you're covered by 10000 rats.
>>733712632>How are 20 hawks going to stop 10.000 rats?Given enough time the hawks could hunt down the rats with impunity, but it would take them months and there's a chance that they'd even have children before it is over.If it's all a straight charge with no preptime, the rats are impossible to stop unless the hunter is equipped with, I dunno, flamethrowers or a tank or something.
>>733707001Hunter and GorillasWe will win with our superior intelligence.
>>733713021>How are you commanding your eagles to attack him specifically?The eagles job is to protect you. They outnumber every other animal twice over except the rats. So there would be at least 2 eagles trying to distract every other thing, while the rats charge and bite everyone to death.Raging bulls can't really do fuck all against air attacks and eventually the eagles will land a hit on their eyes or heads. Gorillas, Bears, Lions and Wolves could catch/swat/bite the eagles but it would slow them down enough and the rats would devour them. Hunter COULD snipe you from a distance, but the eagles could distract him for long enough for the rats to make the distance.I'm not sure about the alligators though. Could the eagles pierce their skin? If not, those could be a problem.
>>733707028I think I can take a gorillaUwU
>>733720432>So there would be at least 2 eagles trying to distract every other thing, while the rats charge and bite everyone to death.They're also animals with no real concept of tactics or strategy or higher thought in general, so good luck with pulling that off.
>>733720007I would expect a massive swarm of rats to kill a single hawk every few dives.
>>733720781>They're also animals with no real concept of tactics or strategy or higher thought in generalTheir strategy is to protect you, which includes attacking whoever tries to kill you.
>>733707001>SEVEN FUCKING BVLLSLiterally overpowered
>>733720928>Their strategy is to protect you, which includes attacking whoever tries to kill you.By intelligently splitting up and distracting every other animal at the same time? Doubtful.
bears big as hell and they got bigger clawsbite them niggas and they got bigger jaws
>>733707001Rats and bulls for meBulls are fucking tanks and that's a lot of rats. Only real issue with that pair are the hawks but honestly just having a swarm of rats on me to leap at them when they swoop down fixes that.
>>733707001The bears and the bulls.
>>733717978didnt know we had zoras on /v/
>>733707001no animal there can stop you from getting shot.so by default, you have to pick the human, even if the human is mid teir at best for defense.rats and birds u can slow down/stop with terrain.bears, gorilla, and ox, you are going to have a much harder time stopping with terrain.alligators, wolves, and lions are upper mid teir.no matter what you pick for your #2, youre screwed anyways.its a lose lose, with soem losses even more quick than others.
>>733713295You cant kite rats, they can smell your food and you need to stop and eat at some point.
>>733717978>go into the water with crocodiles>you cannot dive for any significant period of time>hawks shred your face immediately and you drown>if you dont pick hawks you forgeg rats can swim and the same happens but fasterNever seen a more retarded answer
>>733707001Rats and eagles, I'm sure to win by action economy.
