You know that even if there's an AI "bubble" that the technology doesn't disappear when it pops right
all of the support for it dries up immediately and all of the online models that 99.99999% of people are using dissapear because they dont make money and havent made money since they were createdyou can local host sure, but it will dissapear on the greater internet because no one will host it and no one has (or even wants) the tech required to locally run it
>>733713982so you're saying nothing is going to change?
>>733714336>but it will dissapear on the greater internetno retard i said it will disappear, like all of the shitty copycat sites trying to capitalize on domain gimmicks people will local host but they will be such a small minority because of the complexity and hardware requriements that anybody with more than 2 friends wont have access to generative AI anymore
>>733714506you speak like someone who is very confident but has no idea what they're talking about, sort of like a redditor>complexity>hardware requirementsliterally everyone can run it on basically any modern computer, in two clicksdid you stop following AI four years ago?
>>733715083how many of the people posting or glazing AI are people who basically only have phones or low power laptops?none of those people will be able to local host
OP's pic is shota porn btw
>>733715156>how many people who advocate for AI are actually using itsurely one would assume the answer is almost all of them?
>>733715083>literally everyone can run it on basically any modern computer, in two clicksDon't they do that by outsourcing the bulk of computing to someone else.Sage btw
>>733715292no, you have been able to run it on your own computer just fine for years now
>>733713880>>733714336When the AI bubble pops it's gonna not be forced into everything and at best be quietly removed from apps or at worst be buried and forgotten about. AI usage will drop like a rock as AI models are quietly retired to cut cost. OpenAI will either go under from bankruptcy or will be bought out by a Big Tech company. On top of that a big reason the AI bubble exists is because Big Tech is pals with Trump and MAGA. Trump and MAGA won't be in power forever and there will be a point in which the US government seriously looks at AI and Social Media algorithm regulation and Big Tech will backpedal on AI either out of fear of regulations on it or because a future US Presidential Administration will be investigating Big Tech.
>>733713880it actually does: it's based on server farms, it's a cloud based technology that needs data centers
Yes but hopefully it'll stop being forced down my throat then.
>>733713880The big AI companies have never made a profit off of AI. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, etc have never made a profit and likely never will. They're also dependent on huge server farms and $10k+ GPUs to run.>but local models!Yes, ComfyUI and Deepseek exist and you can run them on a 3090. But the big normalnigger models that are propping up the entire tech industry require massive server farms, and nobody is going to want to pay for the true cost of running them once the free VC money dries up.
>>733713880>Lust provoking image>Stupid time wasting question
>>733713880nah my clique on bluesky told me it'll just explode then
>>733715502You know very well that local models are ass
>>733715083>literally everyone can run it on basically any modern computer, in two clicksthe really simple models, surebut the whole marketing shtick has been the bigger and better and bigger and better, just making the word completion model so massive it can do "anything"localhosting chat works esp if you have a decent gpu or a good amount of ram, but it won't be of the quality of say a gpt5 by a longshot, and that alone will dissuade people. plus, it won't be very fast either, which too will dissuade people, both from using and critically, from hostingremember, many many people use chatgpt and the like on their phone. phones aren't going to be running models of that size.realistically, I think the "end of the ai bubble" won't kill ai, but it'll force it back into specialized models for specific tasks. for example, an OCR model for text recognition. a translation model for text translation. the more scoped the model, the better the results with less hardware requirement. something that could reasonably fit onto an NPU and also be useful to users. because a tiny low quality chatmodel that can only do facefarting erp well enough to jerk off to isn't something people will use all their computing resources for, but an app that can scan all your screenshots and let you search for them by text content is something that could reasonably be seen as a useful additionwhich is a very large difference from the current state of ai
>>733713880The novelty of generic AI art and music might wear off though, even for normies
>>733713982Local hosting would be the best scenario. It would require users to atleast try and be the ones who feed their own personal systems content to work on, rather than a grab bag from everywhere. They will be useful tools for development at that state.
>>733719752It's already washed, every time a new version of GPT comes out a flood of AI images come out. Some look cool at first but the novelty wears out after the first week. Remember the Ghibli trend from last year? Nobody even cares about Sora anymore, and that was supposed to be OpenAI's "next big thing".
>>733717735>>733718417you have fallen for marketing lies
I don't care. I'm here for shota Link
>>733713880The problem is that big models require expensive infrastructure to support.The transition will be away from these mega models and towards more specialized and less resource intensive models that can be hosted for cheap or hosted locally (probably with a subscription model like various professional software tools).The problem with the industry right now is that it's all in on the megamodel course, not because it's the most promising but because controlling expensive infrastructure will let them monopolize the technology in the future. A dual stream with large models in datacenters and small, optimized models hosted locally would be the best for the consumer, but it's not desirable to those paying for the research.
>>733713880Post the rest
>>733719752Kids and old people are even getting tired of aislop. The only people who like the slop are jeets, for obvious reasons.
SEX w/ Toon Link
>>733713880my twitter feed has been nuked by that algorithm changed so I never see AI news anymore, it sucks
>>733719972>Nobody even cares about Sora anymoreDo people really just hang out on /v/ and go damn near nowhere else?
>>733719972everyone is talking about seedance 2.0 now
>>733724909>99% drop in user baseIf we call Highguard dead for losing 90% of its playerbase, then Sora is extra dead
