>b-but I heard it was deboonked by Square!You heard wrong:>"Kitase later clarified that he cannot completely rule out the theory as he did not know the intention of the other two scriptwriters (Nojima and Nomura)."https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8asSQorSngThere's literally not a single argument against R=U. Every time some weird autist gets triggered and tries to argue against it, it's always either "Uh, it was deboonked by Square, m'kay?", which it wasn't as we already saw. Or complete non sequiturs like "it's too deep to be true". But there's not a single actual argument they have against this sea of facts.
truly i tell you
BIG
>>733717318Viii cannot be remade now. Because square will make sure R=U will be closed and never opened to interpretation
>>733719138Only based RE5 can't truly be demade.
dasriet
but how can R = U when squall is dead ?
>>733719010FEETOS
>>733722801LUSEC
>>733717318Based and true
>>733721163Squall is Dead?
hmm
>>733717318Yes, I also believe Ultimecia to be Rinoa if Squall fails at any point of the time loop.
B^U
>>733717318Some anon said you can't have Rinoa and Ultimecia in the same team in some game (I think Dissidia). That's a neat implication.
>>733730115Square has been on the R=U chads' side the entire time.
>>733728187Explain? Why is that a prerequisite?Wait, do you mean Squall needs to die after the credits each loop, when he tries to protect Rinoa when they come to put her in stasis? I mean sure, that makes sense.
>>733717318Spoony already demolished this game. No point in talking about it's shitty lore. Spoony won.
I don't really care. I don't even like Rinoa that much and Ultimecia barely has a character. The reality is that the only reason people care about this theory is because it's a theory. If it ever got proven, the I feel it kinda stops being interesting. This dimwitted fop becomes an evil, 1-dimensional with in the future? Whoop-dee-fucking-doo.
