Why did the stop making video games based on CGI animated movies? You get free assets from the movie and just need to make a game around them. This shouldn't be too hard.
>>733735962because the CGI animated movies are all wokeslop too
Real games based on movies, TV shows, cartoons or even games getting cartoons, TV shows or movies is a dying phenomena now. House of all fucking shows has a game. Nowadays its nothing at all.
They should make a game based on the fugly books just to mess with the fans
>>733735962Sex with Diane
Why are foxes so cute, bros?They're rivaling cats in terms cuteness for me
>>733738505i dont think they are. they're like the reddit version of catsfor cats, its effortless. foxes have to try too hard to be cute and their cuteness is marred by something i cant put a finger on. also, furries are very weird about foxes and i dont even mean anthro ones. makes foxes seem skeevy
Post vidya foxes
>>733739172>reddit version of catsthis means literally nothing
>>733735962Movie assets do not translate to video game assets because movie assets are all pre-rendered and their base files are so massive that they would cause any game engine to commit suicide on attempting to open them. Downscaling is also horrendously expensive and looks horrific. It's cheaper and easier just to rebuild the models from references.
>>733739172Foxes are loyal while cats are not so cats are actually the reddit versionEspecially since you see retarded catposters everywhere, spamming a gif of a cat with disturted view and the caption "Gollock the destroyer" or whatever, cats are the reddiest animal alongside hecking puppers
>>733739172Cats are peak Plebbit kek
