Fallout 5
will suck like the last 3
Nice AI pic
>>734300932it might be good, depends on the location
>>734300901...isn't even in preproduction yet, so it won't be out until the 2040s (not exaggerating)
>>734301194i think it will be out 2030
>>734300978Fo5 will be made with jeet powered ai
>>734300978>AIthat's just fallout 4 with a heavy duty ENB
>>734301194Why doesn't a studio as presumably-big as Bethesda not have multiple in-house teams? Shouldn't they have at least two instead of shifting everybody onto the same 5+ year project?
>>734300901UE5slopa
>>734303891Because scaling up has been the death of many studios, and if they hadn't insisted on wasting time with Starfield it'd have been fine anywayTES VI would be out already and we'd have previews of FO5All they had to do was develop two different series in a tick-tock fashion, doing pre and post on one while focusing main product on the other. Instead they pitched the dumbest shit and got stuck in the garfield mines for like 9 years
>>734303891They only got big after Fallout 4. BGS Maryland only had like around 150 employees before Zenimax started acquiring more studios. Battlecry only had like 50 people before becoming BGS Austin, and BGS Dallas is just their studio for making mobile games. I have no idea what BGS Montreal does.
fallout 5 will have cutscenes instead of dialogue options
That's just modded Fallout 4
>>734303786Mods are a form of AI because they harm the original work the same way AI does.
>>734307145ok
>>734301867It will be made by ai powered by consuming jeets?Based Todd
>>734304289So is style*get it right, omfg
>>734300901What should Fallout 5 be about
>>734301121just about every location is played out besides someplace in the snowy northso you got Washington, Montana, the Dakotas, maybe the great lakes region, I'd say Maine but 76 already covered the hilly, forested, bumblefuck setting, Colorodo could work toomaybe you can include a bit of Canada too
>>734303891Bethesda shit the bed with most of their manpower focusing singly on Starfield you think they are capable of juggling multiple big projects?
>>734310992>you think they are capable of juggling multiple big projects?it's all the same game just with different assets. For them it is honestly not as complicated as jugging multiple projects
there hasn't been a good bethesda game since 2006
>>734303891they have whoever makes 76 and eso which allowed them to sit on their asses and take "creative detours" since 2015 and they shat out starfield.it's okay though, no more "creative detours" >"We're coming back to that classic style that we've missed, that we know really well"everyone is going line up to fall for it again.
