[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: image.png (51 KB, 800x600)
51 KB
51 KB PNG
https://wareya.wordpress.com/2025/12/05/short-bit-measuring-framerates/
I am not sure why almost all framerate measuring software do it wrong. Longer frame times last longer and have more impact, so weigh them by themselves. Faggots that smooth their framerate graphs should kill themselves too.
>>
True.
>>
System latency measurement is more important and there are tools for that.
>>
How can a frame only last 1ms? Even with VRR that is impossible.
>>
>>735080835
>Longer frame times last longer
This has been debunked, they don't.
Pointless thread is pointless.
>>
>>>/g/



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.