>we made all your games look a Sora AI video shat-out by some teenager in Bangladesh>now buy our $5000 GPU, chud!
>what could we do to make our GPUs more expensive AND less appealing?Didn't a single person at the board meeting stand up and go "isn't AI in gaming turning off a lot of people at the moment?"
>>735106592It's not aimed at gamers. It's aimed at investors. Hype them up and make as much money off the AI bubble before it collapses along with the entire economy.
>>735106679Was thinking the same thing. This feature has nothing to do with gaming and everything to do with attracting AI companies to buy their GPUs.
>>735106262>now buy our $5000 GPUisn't this the same company that said they're not about graphics anymore and for the rest of 2026 (which we all know means next year, and the year after that, etc.) that they're not making any new gpus?
>>735106835yes
>>735106679And who pays the price?Hint: it's not the investors.
>>735106912Nobody, because nobody will be able to pay the price!
oh god this looks awful
>>735106262I am honestly more concerned that every game featured was completely on board and they even got positive statements from the companies involved
>>735106262cope
>>735107576It's free money and all they have to do is let NVIDIA put a slop option in their game's graphics settings, an option most people couldn't enable even if they wanted to, and then read a script provided to them by NVIDIA. You think a corp like Capcom is going to say no to that? They'd say yes even if they had no intention of ever using this garbage ever again.
>>735107614wouldn't lara croft be working for mi5 and not the fbi
>>735106262OH NO NO NO NO
