>Finally got to playthrough this online co-op via RPCS3's RPCNHoly. Fucking. Kino.I don't know what you heard about it, whether it's on PS3 or Xbox 360, but it's not on Nintendo's little Wii, because this games a motherfucking P-I-M-P.
>>735108762>playthroughplay through*>gamesgame's*
>>735108762Yeah, it's good. Don't know how it ever got a sequel because the first game sucks.
>>735108967Yeah I played it right after. I assume due to the PS2 era tech, it's almost borderline a horror game with some of the effects, audio and character design choices. Blood on the Sand in comparison, could've been one of those direct to DVD CG movies. But speaking purely from a gameplay perspective, Blood on the Sand is borderline almost as good as a Gears. There's one or two quibbles with the mechanics I have, but overall, still very playable. Meanwhile, the PS2 game, I couldn't get a single good setting for the aiming system, and I tried everything. I still beat it, but to go from smooth and well designed controls to that wasn't fun.
>>735109265>could've been one of those direct to DVD CG movies.Oh and I meant that as a compliment. Like an R-rated 50 cent animated movie that people get nostalgic for.
>>735108762Does he say nigga in this one?
Is this game actually worth playing or are you niggas just trolling?
>>735111361I had it on ps3 and it was fun mostly because all the one liner quips by fiddy and the cover system was fairly good for the time. If you really like Duke Nukem you could check it out I suppose but usually these old fps don’t age very well
>>735111747>Duke NukemWhat -- it's a TPS. It has nothing in common with Duke 3D or even Forever.
>>735111361It's a good game, and becomes a great game if you have a mate to play with. But it's online only so you'll need 2 copies. Fun game if you're into just brainless shooting. It's a third person shooter so IDK why that other anon brought up Duke Nukem.
