>”All video games are generic slop these days!”>”Have you tried X or Y indie game?”>”Ewww why do the graphics look 20 years old!”
They just like to complain
>>735125912I like slop, just not AI slop.
>>735126014Nuh uh
Black thread
>>735126059>mentions AI out of nowhereObsessed
>>735126141>calling out the systematic replacement of human labor with data-slurry is "obsession"written like a literal prompt-generated responseNice try, glowie. Or are you just a "prompter" who’s seething because people can actually tell when a game's dialogue and textures were scraped from a Markov chain? You’re the end-stage consumer—a hollow vessel for whatever "content" is cheapest to produce. You don't actually care about games, you just like the "optimized" feeling of having a machine tell you what to enjoy. Calling it an obsession is the classic "shill" defense to normalize the rot. Everyone sees through you. Post your "art" folder or shut the fuck up, bot.
problem is gameplay is 40 years old and it's generic slop copied 1:1 from 40 years old slopno one wants that, it's just people with toasters liking to cope
>>735126535You sound like an obsessed commie faggot. Go back to resetera. You aren’t entitled to jobs, if AI can do a better job than you, you deserve to be replaced.
>>735126647Old games have superior gameplay though.
>>735126654You're the type of retard who would thank a restaurant for serving him a bowl of lukewarm paste as long as a robot made it. It isn't "efficiency," it's the total commercialization of your own lobotomy. Go back to twitter and post more "waifu" prompts that look like plastic meltdowns. You're the ultimate NPC.
>>735126761You must be very butthurt then that AI is winning and every company and industry is adopting it, while you seethe impotently on bluesky to your following of 15 troons, 3 furries and 2 feminists.
>>735126878The "AI is winning" line is the most hilarious cope I've seen today. You're like a peasant in the 1800s cheering for the industrial loom while your own clothes start being made of itchy burlap and polyester. You aren't "winning," you're just being optimized into a more efficient unit of consumption.You’ve outsourced your personality to /pol/ infographics and your entertainment to a GPU farm that scrapes data from the very people you're "owning." You'll spend the rest of your life consuming statistical averages and calling it "based" because you're too terrified to admit that you've lost the ability to appreciate anything that wasn't generated by a corporation to be as cheap and soulless as possible. You’re a terminal consumer, a hollow vessel waiting for a machine to tell you what your opinion is so you can "win" another argument on a dying imageboard. You’re the end-state bugman. NGMI.
>>735126972>You're like a peasant in the 1800s cheering for the industrial loom while your own clothes start being made of itchy burlap and polyester.Lmao, are you a Luddite or something? Do you think we should be still riding horses instead of driving cars? Or using oil lamps instead of electric lightbulbs? Or typewriters instead of computers?Go live in the forest then.
>>735126972Not the guy you’re arguing with but he’s basically right. No one even mentioned AI and you’re already butthurt, and instead of acknowledging that you’re angry for no significant reason, you double down on your butthurted-ness and bitch about narcissistic digital artists losing their jobs.If you actually want to convince people (which I doubt you want to), you don’t shame people, insult them, and get angry at them for questioning you.
>>735127213Imagine being so brain-rotted by Reddit "logic" that you think a car getting you to work faster is the same thing as a machine shitting out a hollow, statistical average of a video game. A lightbulb is a better tool for a job. AI slop is just a cheaper way to feed you garbage.
>>735127339AI is in its earliest stages. When manufactured textiles was new, they literally were inferior in every way to hand woven clothes. I think what scares you is how quickly AI is advancing and that it will eventually be almost impossible to distinguish it from something human-made.
>>735127498"Impossible to distinguish" isn't a compliment to the AI, it's an indictment of your own sub-room-temperature IQ. If you can't tell the difference between human creative intent and a GPU scraping a database to find the most "likely" next pixel, it’s because you’ve already been filtered by your own mediocrity.
