[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: highguard.jpg (579 KB, 1344x768)
579 KB
579 KB JPG
Now that the dust is gone, what was so wrong with the game, gameplay wise?
>>
>>735128961
Has that frog always been there
>>
>>735129418
Yes
>>
>>735128961
I remember watching the gameplay overview or whatever that was called on the Steam page and I felt a dissonance between the action described that the players were supposed to do during a match and the 8-30 minute match length. This game might have been less of a failure if it was more MOBA-like.
>Longer matches on average, but ideally not going about 40 minutes
>Much larger roster
>In-between objectives you need to take before attacking the base
>Sword should matter more, acting sort of like a mid-boss
>>
>>735129418
I....had...no idea. Wtf is that frog? Bring back Highguard!
>>
Dusty old bones full of green dust
>>
>>735128961
it was just one 3v3 match that got old quick, the seige weapons were cool, it had some cool things about it, if it had more game modes it might have been all right



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.