Am I supposed to pretend bottom doesn't look better to fit in with epic gaming culture?
>>735141658Why did jeetvidia make her 10 years older
1 it doesn't look better2 it will instantly break in motion because LLMs cannot keep memory of what things should look like scene after scene so next cutscene she can suddenly look like a completely different person
>>735141658bottom looks insanely better. people are just saying differently to be contrarian.
>>735141658I love defined jaws and cheekbones on my women
It just looks like a totally different person (in a room with different lighting).
>>735141658No, you're supposed to not be retarded enough to have to pretend.
>>735141658
>>735141658bottom is brighter and top has a few shadows morenothing i would care about while playing, and if someone asked me if i played top or bottom i probably wouldnt know
>>735141658You're supposed to cope and seethe (which you are), incel.
>>735141658It obviously looks more realistic but if you think that's anything more than a tech demo and that you'll actually be able to play a game that looks like that any time soon you're delusional.Reminds me of those tech bros who generate an AI video of gameplay and then pretend like it's an actual real game. It's just a video.
>>735142026Why did it turn Leon into a 20 year old man
>>735141778the problem isn't that it looks better or worse, the problem is that it change the look of things, and especially characters, to what the AI model has been trained on, which is mainly generic eastern european models face.the pic on the bottom looks like a very generic photoshoot bitch with a lot of make up on her face, which is also the reason why all AI made commercials look so soulless and plastic
I hate how it's driven by those AI porn models that give the girls brown nipples.
>>735142078I don't think he's legal anon
>>735141658Bottom looks better. Anyone with eyes can see that. You're being psyoped
>>7351417321. not an LLM2. games need to 'support' it by providing additional data, similar to motion vectors in DLSS they would be giving context to the model on what its rendering for consistency
>>735142572It's crazy how many retards just think it's a version of img2img running over the output
>>735141881>left looks like a videogame and has the percieved budget of a few million dollars>right looks like a slop google image search and has the percieved budget of 0 dollars.
The worst part is there are no raindrops in either of them. Turn DLSS off and there is a downpour in that scene. Turn it on, the downpour disappears and the sun is coming out.
I yearn for the day the industry shifts the focus from graphicsfaggotry to making actual fun games again.
>>735142830>left looks like a video game>right looks real yes. that's the point
>>735143209maybe they'll learn after the market crahahahah i cant even type that with a straight face they are actually incapable of learning from their mistakes
Why are right wjngers so weird
>>735142896Topkek t17 withe the bants
Yeah I am in the minority on this one, I think bottom looks better
>>735143209>I don't like gamestake up knitting then
DLSS 5 looks flawless, there's nothing to complain about.
>>735142191>the problem is that it change the look of things, and especially charactersWhich is a completely dishonest load of bullshit coming from fucking PCfaggots. Just go browse nexusmods and see how many popular degenerate character mods exist then try and tell me you care about artistic intent, fucking twat.
>>735141658>Nooooo!!! Grace doesn't look like my perfect 2D anime waifus anymore!!! Noooooo!!
>>735143535the vast majority of people don't use those mods because they look like retarded slop
>>735143535>Which is a completely dishonest load of bullshitIrony
>>735143353they refuse to touch women
>>735142896Is team17 still alive?
>>735143258right doesn't look realistic, it looks like a photoshoot
>>735143502Uhm. Just play slow cinematic games with no fast movement, OK?
>>735144473>>735143258Looks like a 0 view youtube video pushed onto your feed by the slop algorithm. lmao
>>735141732Not an LLM
>there're people defending this garbage
>>735141658If you're a brainless Nvidia hater, yes.
>>735144614This. All those high contrast, sharpened thumbnails with fake remasters, and when you click it its some AI voice over and bot comments
>>735144672>there're
>>735144614So we agree it doesn't look like a video game. Got it
>>735144765>their'eir
>>735144672Did we evolve from 6 fingers to ten already?
>>735141658Stop posting screenshots, video games don't stand still, post videos
>>735144884>Stop noticing, saar!!
>>735144340I'm pretty sure it's women that don't want to touch them
>>735144884the videos look even worse lol
>>735141658Bottom looks like the shitty ads I get for AI chatbots When I watch YouTube on my phone without ad block.
>>735144938That's the point
>>735141881On the left, a dreary scene leading up to a genuinely horrifying murder scene. On the right, a sunny afternoon depicting a college girl on the way to her anti-white male studies class which she pays for by stripping.
>>735141658i think this is a blue dress/white dress situation where some people see it as good and the rest are horrified by it
>>735144884
>>735145521Gotta admit, kicking a ball so hard it temporarily compresses into a miniature black hole is pretty badass
>>735142830>>735145020>REEEEEEE THE GIRL IS PRETTYAI slop > activism
she's beautiful that's why the hate, trannies can't cope as usual
The lighting is fucked but the actual problems are that DLSS fucks up input, the most important thing in a game; and that this will make devs even lazier so playing without this fucked up option will look even worse. And all to counter the 10 years of intentional added blurs they have been doing.
>2 x 5090s running this
>The only people who notice DLSS issues are the ones who own AMD
>>735141658Bottom looks like some hollyjew prostitute who got cheek fat reduction
>>735141658You know that bottom is generic because the AI is trained on millions of Instagram photos, right?
>>735143258it doesn't look real though it's like an uncanny yassified instagram filter, why are you pretending to be retarded? is that really what passes for amusement to you?
>Millions in R&D to make something that looks like a 4chan/twitter shitpost about how they have a hard time jacking off to women characters.
>>735145989>it's like an uncanny yassified instagram filter,thats not really a major roadblock for this, we have been able to avoid the "AI" look for awhile now. main questions are what it looks like in heavy motion and how hard is it to run real time
>>735145521>>735146304>what it looks like in heavy motionWe already know. It's gonna ghost.
>>735146304The clips they showed have bad ghosting, and nvidia confirmed this is currently running on two 5090s.
>>735146304>we have been able to avoid the "AI" look for awhile nowlmao no
>>735145521it's like a cool speed effect motion blur
>>735142639Well that's exactly what it fucking looks like so you can't blame them for thinking that. It looks like utter shit.
>>735146034>>735145989The fact that it makes you suffer makes it even better and more welcome
My biggest problems with it is the AI makes everything look like it has the same style, and that the lighting is complete ass, like every clip it looks like there's a lighting source coming from the camera.
>>735146564Doesn't explain why it is crystal clear in the last frame. Did it stop in the air?
>>735146460let me guess, you think AI still generates hands with 6 fingers and follow the food pyramid?
>>735147112yeah because it does
>>735147112It was giving Netanyahu six fingers in his weird proof of life videos so yeah
>>735141658I choose to believe anyone defending this shit here is trolling for my own fucking sanity.This looks like utter fucking DOGSHIT dude.How can they not see this looks insanely uncanny like they got a model from a photoshoot magazine with a completely different face shape, lighting, even the angle (her face is now straight at the camera instead of at a slight tilt)and stitched it on to a character that looks fine as is in a game that looks insanely good already.It changes the art style to some generic ass stable diffusion shit that isn't representative of the scene's lighting.FUCK
>>735147906Top is uncanny valley dogshit scanned corpsefacebottom looks actually good, besides being muh realism shit
>>735143429I totally agree, bottom really looks better just more detailed. It doesn't look like it turned to an ogre or something and looks aesthetically pleasing to the eye. I just can't see the horror (lol) that everyone else does and it's bugging me a bit if I have to admit. They say "Instagram filter", but are Instagram filters designed to make one look horrible or attractive? What am I missing? The only conclusion I come up with is it's tied to the AI debate and where one stands on it. If we get more screenshots, remove the labels, and ask people which you like better from a sample, I bet the results would be comedically interesting.
>>735146723Not seeing this "looks shit" part. Sorry.
>>735141658you're free to have your own opinion, just not on public spaces
>>735149064>Not seeing [...]yes i can tell you're blind
>>735149113Just like I can tell you're poor
>>735148151Here look, the scene shown is low contrast with flat lighting on purpose, it's overcast and grey.If it looks uncanny it's a limitation of that one shot in less than flattering lighting conditions and the AI filter adds photoshoot lighting to make it have contrast that doesn't exist in the first place.If you take a scene in game that has contrast you can see it doesn't match what her face should look like.And if you can't see that these are two different women I can't think of anything else to tell you.
>>735143258>real
>>735149350>the DLSS5 image looks different to the path traced imageyes. I can see that. The DLSS5 one looks better.
>>735149350top still looks like a shitty unsexy scanned corpsefacebottom looks good
>>735146304>>735147112nothing you can do with purpose-made loras and expensive, slow, iterative 'edit' models applies to real time frame modification you spastic
>>735149720the game still draws the model. DLSS5 just adjusts textures and lighting. You spastic
>>735149350https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySovS2LXMp8>thinking AI cant handle dynamic lightingoh boy, you are seriously not prepared for whats coming anon
>>735149860Yes it's running the output of the game through a shitty realtime img2img model with a low denoising strength and some motion vectors. One that has no understanding of what it's looking at or any knowledge of the light sources that exist outside of the frame it is givenwhich is why it hallucinates the same model look like two different people depending on the scene
>>735150205>it hallucinates the same model look like two different people depending on the sceneNo it doesn't. That's just your cope.
>>735150341It does and it's obvious why it does if you know anything about diffusion models
People will complain about anything, it'd judy.mostly cope because they are poor or something ams cultist. This is you right now while watching it. Hurr durr AI bad, reddit told me so.
>>73514207820? He's clearly waaaay younger. Maybe 17 at most.
>>735149529>>735149645tell me why the bottom one looks good besides getting your dick hard with your bimbo fetish you retarded niggers.If you think picrel looks totally natural too then I can just stop here knowing you either don't have eyes or just eat up any shit that comes your way.>>735149884>showing a different unrelated model for video editing
>>735150525>realistic lighting>it just removes half of the shadows and gives her face softbox studio lighting while adding unnecessary detail that isn't therethis shit is so gay
>>735143080This has been happening for a while with dlss. I remember dlss nuking rain and other similar effects in PoE2 at least back when I ñlayed it on release. That plus how flurry it looked made me swotch to one of the other upscaling options that had other issues but at least effects still showed and you could tell things appart.
>>735141658>put hot girl in game>faggots still want to argue that she isn't hot enough or sexualised enough You niggers are turning me to the dark side with all this shit
>>735145521>>735145646It's like some inazuma eleven shit kek
>>735150525I don't fucking care about your hate for what's normal to like.If it makes a character look beautiful, hot and sexualized, it gets the upper handBoth are awful to look at and neither belong to any screenDie mad about it>>735150656I will now play your activism-free game
>>735150525how is it unrelated you retard, current existing image models can handle lighting really well. you dont think nvidia can achieve this with perfect light source data from game engines?
>>735150874first things first it's not the same peoplethat being said....characters shouldn't be muh realistic but designed and idealized periodshe beautiful now, but she isn't any less desexualized
>>735141881Right doesnt even look like a videogame
>>735141658Bottom looks AI generated.
>>735141658It doesn't even look as good as faces from games made 13 years ago, before you were born.
>>735150525>>showing a different unrelated model for video editingIt's the same tech, just real-time now.
>>735155332Many people are saying this
>>735144672anons will defend and post anything for "le ebin bait"
Why is this even being developed as the new iteration of DLSS?Nothing about DLSS 5 aims to improve the supersampled image output in any way, and it clearly changes the intended look of the game. This has nothing to do with the "SS" of "DLSS", it should not be lumped into DLSS in the first place.it's absolutely baffling to me to follow up DLSS 4.5 with this.
>68M views>62K likesis this what you call ratio'd?
>>735141658Bottom has that hollywood cg movie looks. Guess this is our future now.
>>735141732>it doesn't look better
>>735156982because if they called it something else then they would have to market it from scratch. They just don't care. Frame generation has nothing to do with super sampling either but they still lump it in there
>>735141658retard
>>735159893>it will instantly break in motionit was shown in motion though and it had temporal consistency. If you have only seen this from the still images, you should watch the videos.
>>735141658You're supposed to recognize it yourself. If you genuinely think bottom looks better, you're a stupid fucking goyim and deserve everything terrible that's coming for you.
>>735160629>replied to wrong person
>>735141881SAAAAAAAAAAR
>>735141658>>735141778indians really going to bat for this shit
>>735141658top looks like a fragile girl, bottom looks like she could pour acid on my face while I sleep.
>>735160840>>735160972Why do indians love AI so much when they are so very poor?
>>735160629Can they show a clip of more than 3 seconds in motion? Of gameplay preferably
>>735141881ah yes put even MORE filters on it, that will shut doubters up
>>735161375According to people at CES they did
Am I supposed to pretend that the sloppa filter doesn't look more like the original face model than the left?
>>735161510they were only showing 4.5 at CES because I would have laughed in their faces if I saw this shit
>>735161996CES, GTC, GDC, ABCDEFG I don't know what all these acronyms mean. Whatever the most recent one was.
>>735141658I simply lose interest if I feel a thing wasnt made by a human.I dont care how it looks, ive tried to care, ive tried to be ok with Ai gen stuff like thisBut it just never clicks in my brain as interestingI learn it wasnt made by a person and it just loses all value to me. I dont know why. Im not even trying to step into this political shit that /v/ is nowadays. Its like I see it and it just becomes background noise to me in comparison. If I cant tell, then sure itll be different, but I still can enough for it to be an issue. Im not even anti ai usage, I work in the tech sector and have set up ai integrations. Its impressive what you can do with it, but even then, even stuff ive used ai for, even stuff that took genuine effort from me to get the ai to work properly. Still just, when I see it. When I see art on a shirt in a game made by ai, if I know its that, my brain just acts like its background noise
>>735162439
>>735162439It's tough for me now. I'm starting to recognize that I don't mind AI, I just hate imperfections that it typically has. If a an image has a melted finger/fingernail, or other sorts of easy to spot errors. I hate it.But if it looks good and the errors aren't there, I actually don't care. Maybe i'm just a shallow chud, but it's just how my brain works
>>735162809Yea probably. But im still not interested in flying a plane with bullet holes in the wings, no matter how nicely you claim it flies
>>735163150Not to mention Ai tends to get rid of natural imperfections while adding fake ones.
>>735162809This isnt a good argument anon. As he said before, what current ai usage is doing is attempting to sell you broken planes claiming its good. AI usage you dont notice as a consumer, usually doesnt generate money, just lowers costs That "amount of change" that they are trying to sell is there for a reason
>>735161263Because they think it will make them rich without needing either talent or effort.It's literally the dream of every Indian. Their culture is rigged to induce this thinking.
Damn nvidia is really in damage control over this. Surprising considering I thought they didn't give a shit about vidya anymore
>>735163410It is a completely accurate argument though. If it didn't look like dreamshaper from 2024 and actually looked good, nobody would give a shit.Everyone is also focused on the faces, but look at the clothing textures, they are perfect, because it's not triggering the uncanny slop reflex in our brains.
Its the white and gold/black and blue dress psyop 2.0.
>>735163739idk, point out the flaws in it that makes the top one look better to you. If you can't articulate it, then you are just hating it because it's AI and you've been programmed to hate AI
bottom looks like an AI generated image, therefore it's bad even if it looks objectively better.It's all about SOVL, which AI clearly doesn't have.
>>735163679Creating uncanny faces is the hardest thing for any art to beat. Its why a good artstyle creates more immersiveness than realism Its crazy how our bodies evolved to distinguish humans from "close to humans, but not fully". I understand its probably an evolution thing for attracting mates of the same species during staged evolution but I wanna believe in skin walkers
>>735163973I'm a pro AI advocate, much to the chagrin of my wife who thinks it's satanic or something.
>>735164364I am into the technology of AI but against the vast majority of the applications. Meanwhile my wife happily watches AI slop. When I point out that it's AI she just says "so what, it's cool".I don't think the tech is evil or anything. I think that every single AI thing you and I have ever seen has a person behind it. Every single piece of slop exists because a human asked for it and shared it. But the jews have successfully turned most people against the technology instead of the hands pulling the triggers. At least people calling people who post AI Indian is closer to the actual reality of it, even if they are off base by a lot.
>>735164134>>735162439This is unironically why I believe AI generated art looks bad.Not even the meme sovl, but because AI art has literally no heart in it. No soul. If the machine spirit erupts ill change my mind
>>735164615>At least people calling people who post AI Indian is closer to the actual reality of it, even if they are off base by a lot.What about the Chinese?
Did they do the same thing to Leon?
>>735146723>Retards don't do research, they just react emotionally, you can't blame them for being emotionally reacting retards instead of doing research.Yes, yes you can fucking blame them, that's exactly what you can blame their for, it's not my responsibility to subsidize your ignorance.
>>735141658PC vegans will defend this, but act like Demon's Souls remake is bad because "muh artstyle." Fucking hypocrites.
>>735143535The people installing bimbo mods are the same people insisting that AI filters to turn every character into a generic composite of stock image models are good They're the same style of cretin, the average person doesn't want either
>>735141658I'm convinced AI is a litmus test for brownoids.Tthe bottom looks awful you fucking mong.
>>735141658The original image is what Japs thinks Westerners look like while the bottom image is what Westerners think Westerners look like.
it turns flawed graphics into fake graphics
Am I retarded or wouldn't it look slightly different every time you played the game? Even if it looked good that would bother me
>>735154509neither did the one on the left 25 years ago, retard
>>735164663It's Jews, Anon.
>>735145989>uncannyyou retards dont even know what that word means. the original looks uncanny, like a creepy little doll, almost human but missing minor details. the photorealistic dlss version looks "photorealistic" not uncanny. same retards crying about how real AI is getting are the ones saying it looks fake now. fuckn retard tranny faggots
>>735168029It doesnt work like that anon, right one will never look good it will forever be AI slop filter
>>735168098It could always be a chinaman.
>>735141658Sorry, but the bottom one looks like Amber Heard. So no.
I'm not sure if I agree with it being used in games like Resident Evil but fuck me, there is absolutely no way that people can look at the Starfield characters and think "Yeah it actually looked better before"Fuck off. Fuck your own face.Bethesda games have notoriously dogshit faces. If it means we need AI to make them actually look remotely human then it is a necessary evil that we all must accept.
>>735151336>perfect light source data from game enginesThat doesn't exist or else they wouldn't make an AI to have more realistic lighting.
