>slightly bigger >more immersive>but utterly shunned for its lesser brotherbros...how do we cope..
4k above all else
>>735599192you're an idiot
Thanks doc
>>735599228grrrrrrrr....
Why not 8:5?
>>735599946dude that's half the size that would be too small
>>735599946The same reason the Third Pounder by Burger King was a financial disaster, because Americans thought 1/4 was larger than 1/3
>>735599023loved my 16:10 asus monitor
vertical space is meaninglessultrawides are where it's at
Thanks Doc
>>735600150what a faggot
>>735600150Mine is too big but I feel stuck with it
>>735599023Thanks, doc.
>meme resolutionif we're talking superiority, 4:3, 3:2, and UW are all objectively superior to this hollywood-inspired resolution.but just buy what works, and what works is 4k