>pretty much just a digital yes-manNo wonder the wealthy like it.
>let me explain why that bad thing is actually a good thingthey do be like that doe
video games?
>>736143386I wish this fucking AI shit just straight up told you "NO" or "i do NOT know the answer to your question" , instead of hallucinating some bullshit and being so damn certain about it...
I dunno, these bots tell me "NO" here and there.
They may be digital yes-men, but at least they're more emotionally supportive than you are.
>>736143386better than a realistic no-man who needs $320 to draw me a simplistic picture they do for $0
new captcha test
>>736144036Really, it would be much better this way.
>>736144036That's what annoys me most about it. The only thing they can do is answer questions and they do it wrong half the time.
>>736144365Claude told me "To be honest, I can't answer with 100% certainty" and I think that's the right direction.
>>736143386>when the bot tells me no but always acknowledges men are stronger than women
>>736147912That bullshit happens so often. You ask it something and it gives an answer based on political correctness rather than factual correctness and you always have to push back for details before it makes any concessions about the actual facts.Every time I get into an argument with someone about something that is related to politics they always want to prove they are right by going to AI which does in fact support their position with the first reply and I always have to say "Now ask it about..." and only then does it start to give something close to the truth. What help is this crap if you have to already know the right answer to everything you ask it so you know when it's talking shit?
>>736143386At the moment AI can't really think on its own, but it can interpret your input thus allowing you to reinterpret your own thoughts through a machine. Basically it's only about as intelligent as its user.
>Microslop losing investor trust and backing out of the AI game>OpenAI gets into more legal trouble with each passing day, losing millions per month>Google found a way to limit RAM costs by 60%>AI can't even do the simplest McJob and take a drive through order>96% of all AI driven projects fail utterly and totally>Even Goldman Sachs is warning that AI adds 0,0% to the economy>Everybody is looking to sue everybody>in-fighting begins>General public hype is fading because most people dislikes the slop>Meanwhile, open-source models cropping up everywhere with actual useful speciality AI>All of these can be run locally on a laptop, making big tech shit and piss their pantsIs this retarded madness almost over? All this over a beefed-up search engine with a sycophantic attitude.
S K I L LI S S U E
>>736150434>>Meanwhile, open-source models cropping up everywhereI mean, you wrote it yourself.. as long as all the shitloads of Chink open source AI stuff on github keeps releasing every few days, then AI will never actually die.Maaaaybe if we're lucky the Murrican jewish cunts driving everything up with their AI obsession will finally start dying, which is great.. but AI itself isnt gona poof anytime soon
>>736151041You misunderstand. I don't want AI to go away, it has its uses. With controlled data sets, a clear-cut small scope of goals, and human input, AI is a pretty good tool. Perfectly fine. I just wouldn't call it AI, it's kind of a misnomer, but whatever. I just want the bubble to burst and the hype to die down. I'm sick of AI being forced into everything. What in the flying fuck is co-pilot doing in Notepad for example? It sucks, it doesn't work, nobody gives a shit and everybody is just wasting time chasing a dragon that won't be real for literal decades, if even possible at all (AGI). We won't get anywhere with AI in some kind of arms race. We'll just get more fake garbage. Ironically, things need to slow down to get worthwhile research going.
