[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


SH1 deserved a better direct sequel than this
>>
What other franchises with no good games do /v/ worship?
>>
SH3 was an alright game but the plot was all over the place
>>
it was written for unironic foids but the writing wasn't as on the nose an femminist as f so the player has to do some work to get it if theyre a moid.
>>
SH1 didn't need a direct sequel
this did it pretty well, did you really want Harry to go back to SH for... reasons?
>>
>>736163481
1 and 2 are good games despite their average gameplay and low difficulty
>>
>>736163525
It’s a short game, plot was comparably minimal
>>
The first half is weak. Too little story (not that there's that much story in the second half either)
>>
>>736162071
i think sh4 is better than 3
1>2>origins>4>3
>>
it's a great game despite its flaws tho
better than 2 even
>>
Indeed it does



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.