>you will play with 500ms input lag and pixelated image and be happyfucking boomers man
>bro trust me bro just give game streaming another chance bro, this time it's for real, it's the future bro, just please invest bro it will work this time bro
>>736184347console wars will be literal wars for ram factories and rare earth metals.
Pachter predicted $800 PS5https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsRIZEO0xGg&t=21s
>>736184347>make component prices skyrocket on purpose>sell streaming services as the cure (the very thing that caused component prices to skyrocket in the first place)Clown world
>>736184347>Michael PachterHow does this retard still get paid?
There are a lot of happy new PS5 Pro owners ITThttps://www.reddit.com/r/PS5pro/comments/1s9lydw/playstation_5_pro_is_now_out_of_stock_on_amazon/
>>736185018>sell streaming services as the cureAll part of the plan for the own nothing, subscribe to everything.
>Michael PachterThis retard also said X360 is way more powerful than any PC.
>>736188471When the Xbox 360 launched, this was true. Oblivion was unable to run on PCs when it launched on the 360.
>>736184837>Pachter predicted $800 PS5He was right, eventually.
>>736184656But streaming works (locally)
nvidia's one seems quite good
>>736188727not when he needed to be, unfortunately
LMAO, hope they do not need as many stadias as concords to get it
>>736188784give it back
>>736184347>blueorigingaming
>>736188727lol
Subscribe Streaming also takes care of the pesky modders removing DEI from their games and adding sexy mods.Total compliance goyim !
>>736184347why is it always "more power for more money" nowwhy can't it be "same power for less money", like ps3 slim
>>736189572Just stay on your PS3 slim
If they price it at $1k, then people will just go to pc. If you're going to spend $1k on a system, you go pc. It's that simple. The line when you decide to go pc is literally $1k.Jesus, these people are retarded.
>>736184347$1000 is pure copium it will be $1200 minimum for the digital only version. If it's $1000 it will at best be a rebranded PS5 pro with .5vram added to it
>>736189572i mean, we're getting closer to "less anything for more money" these days with most products in general
>>736189871but whywe got switch 1 for $300we got $100 phones with more power than switch 1we could've had a cheap switch for $100, or a moderate power increase for the same $300why did it have to be a $500 console
>>736190064Why do you need something new? Just stick with your Switch and $100 phone.
>>736190408it's their job to expand their userbasecheaper devices expand the userbaselarger userbase means more people buy gamesdigital costs have no distribution costs, selling one and selling five costs you baisically the same in overheadso you want to sell five
>>736191342That doesn't answer my question. Why don't YOU just stick with the Switch 1 or your $100 phone? Also, their job is to make money. They can do it by expanding their userbase in various ways. If they wanted to really expand their userbase, they should put their games on multiple platforms, specifically mobile.
>>736187185This.
>Michael Pachter
>2030>ps6 is streaming based >Nintendo games cost 120$ >Xbox is a PC
>create problem>offer solution where you will own nothing foreverWe're saved!
