I have safe retro fatigue
I have fatigueNo seriously, someone please call a doctor I'm having trouble moving
>>736198712>safe ______Faggot
I have fatigue fatigue
>>736198712I know I'm being baited, but what the fuck is 'safe' retro?
>>736198712This. What a lot of modern day indie devs forget is how horny the 80s-00s gaming era was. They want to scrub out all the bikini armor and high waisted leotards. Those retarded sexless Zoomers.
>>736198796fpwp, someone help this anon
>>736198882It's like safe horny but for retro
>>736198882He's not a gamer he doesn't know
i have retarded faggot OPs fatigue
>>736198883>how horny the 80s-00s gaming era wasIt wasn't horny at all because that word usage didn't exist then
>>736198796>>736198942Just walk it off
Unnecessary Dangerous Faggotry:>>736198712
>>736198712I have never played these games but just looking at them gives me safe retro fatigue
>>736200796Never played much Dungeon Keeper, did you zoom?
>>736198712>UFO 50>Safe retro>The game that opens with a intentionally janky homage to 80s bedroom coder solo dev games>The game that actually has the balls to bring back game mechanics every zoomer game designer deems taboo like limited lives, continues and scoring mechanics.>The game that's full of true arcade style games which it doesn't consider you to have properly beaten until you 1CC them
>>736198712Why does this term anger anons so much on here?
>>736201892Nigga stop trying to shill it, no one here liked that fake retroslopGame launched in August of 2024. Go look for threads about it and see if any read positive, if you can find any threads at all
>>736202198We had comfy threads about it for months sharing progress and advice anon. Sorry that you got filtered. Maybe try making a thread about the game that's filtering you next time and people might just help you out.
>>736198882Its retro without the jank of the old games and quality of life features that make them easier than older games
>>736202497So basically older games minus things that made them shitWhy is that a bad thing?
>>736202081It's the repost. This guy has posted this before with the exact same games and the exact OP. It's irritation at baiting people into the same arguments because he's farming the same post. I'm not going to go through the effort of calling out why some literal who crap like Sea of Stars is up there again. Faggot op is just gonna heap this trash topic up again later like a bot.
>>736198712These are all good games though. Except Sea of Stars, never heard of it.
>>736198712zoomers despise super metroid's controls doe
Example of unsafe retro?
OP is just safe contrarian
>>736202562Those bad things can be seen as good things and add to the experience and make it more challenging like timed lives or limited saves
>>736203161final fantasy 2warcraft 2frogger on ps1kid icarusmaken Xdragon's lairbug! for the sega saturn
>>736203161unsafe retro is genres that casual gamers wouldnt like such as RTS, dungeon crawler, grand strategy
>>736203325>Those bad things can be seen as good thingsOnly to 50 year old geezersAll they added is making the game miserable >timed lives or limited savesLiterally was made to increase playtime out of games that otherwise only had less than 2 hours of playtime, and to combat rentalsNothing of value was lost when indie games ignore those missing aspects>>736198712>>736202198I have faggot OP fatigue
>>736203161shit that would filter consolefagsultima 4, star control 2, system shock 1, mechwarrior 2
>>736203161Metal Slug, Shinobi, Raiden, stuff like that
>>736202562You'd have to ask OP. There's some really good games that have come out of this approach, like Cuphead.
>>736203161Text adventures.
>>736206227Zork probably filters the dudes who make these threads
>>736205745I thought people agreed one of, if not the best version, of Ultima 4 was on SMS lol. Also System Shock 1 plays good on a controller, I tried it on my Vita a few years ago and it was a solid experience. KB+M is more comfortable for that game but damn I love System Shock dude.
>>736205745Ultima 4 was on console retardkun
>>736198712that isn't retro though?what
