So we're definitely getting a new Starfox game soon, right? Nintendo wouldn't blueball us like this for nothing, right?
You will get another reimagining of Star Fox 64 and you will like it
Star Fox princess maker game where you help Wolf turn Fox into a proper wife.
>>736247731this Fox can definitely rock and roll
>>736248159finally a good idea in one of these threads
>>736249128Wrong, he says "Let's do this" now.
Fat Princess type game, but it is Fox and Wolf taking turns being the fat prince of the round.
It's gonna be an extraction rail-shooter
>>736248159Finally a good star fox game
>>736248135You WILL pay $90 for the MEATY 90 minute on rails shooter experience with a rehashed plot!
Here's your new team Star Fox
Apparently we might be getting a new classic style this yearAlso an adventure style one but I wouldn't be surprised if thats just someone getting mixed up and Adventures is coming to NSO
>>736252123We say nso because its obviously where it should be by now but this is greedy piggy nintendo they will bundle adventures + assault for $70 with the only change being a nigh-imperceptible textures update
>>736251753>falco mpregged fox and they had a childbased???
>>736251753>Falco stole Captain Falcons boots
>>736248159glad to see intelligent people still come to /v/
>>736247731Watched the movie just for him, hope he gets a ton of porn
>>736248159>>736250229>>736250921>>736251670>>736252471>>736252628The most exciting part of the prospect of a new game is seeing none of the retarded gay fanfiction actually make it into the game, and all the redditroons trying to convince everyone their schizo headcanon is real.
>>736253171Still seething I see
yeah but it'll be about Krystal since she's a woman
>>736253303It'll be a woman, but not the woman you're expecting
>>736253171in some routes fox tops and in others wolf topsit's about how u raise fox
>>736253171>haha gays, Nintendo will NEVER confirm you gay fanfic art hahahaWhy would I give two shits when I just want a good Star Fox game AND good gay art of Star Fox men? I don't need the two to intersect. Lesbians yuri retards are the only ones that care about muh canon gayness in their media.
>>736247731Starfox Zero Switch edition
>>736253171I don't think the events of the actual fiction has ever influenced people to stop shipping, anon.
>>736253171Meanwhile, in the canon ultrahetero universe, Krystal cucks Fox with a nigger named Panther
>>736250229You've been told to commit suicide repeatedly though
>>736253171To be fair, even sakurai and imamura ship them
>>736247731It better be more of an arcade flight sim and less of a on-rails shooter
>>736254113It will be a space logistics & shipping game, Truck Simulator: Nintendo Furry Space Opera
>>736251753Falco taking Peppy's role as the old mentor of the team actually would be cool. I do not care for how those kids look though.
>>736247731Who knows, did we get a new DK game after the movie? then probably not.
>>736254842Why is Lucy grey here when her official art and portrait are pink? She looks much better like this regardless
>>736254915Not immediately, but in the DKB interview they did reveal that it along with his movie appearance was part of an effort to bring DK back into the limelight along with his whole redesign; it just so happened that his movie appearance was the first public display of this, which likely meant that DKB was planned much earlier but came about later due to it being pushed back/delayed for switch 2 (which would line up with it starting out as a switch game originally)
>>736247731Nintendo will definitely revive the franchise and give it the Metroid Prime treatment
>>736248159I've seen so much content like this that I'm worried I won't be able to take him seriously in the movie
>>736250546I thought he said "Let's get this party started!"
>>736253418the rc21 comic where Fox tops is the best art the fanbase has produced
>>736254079that smash endcard where fox and wolf stargaze side-by-side...of course, it could just mean nothing, like ben affleck and matt damons relationship.
>>736251734Can I have some shoehorned console gimmicks, too?
>>736251753>Put Fox in the movie to put his games back into the public view>New game doesn't feature Fox whatsoeverIt would be so funny.
You could make the best F-Zero/Star Fox/Wave Race game ever, made in its predecessor's image. It would never be enough.Gamers don't have the kind of relationship with replay value that 90's Nintendo/AV made games in mind with.A lot needs to happen culturally to inspire people towards familiarizing themselves with,and even crave an experience rooted in, that context. (arcade design)"I want cheaper, shorter games, with worse graphics, more sustainable development and I'm not kidding."You can't do any of that when the majority of people come from that era of Nintendo fans,who were happy to see Star Fox turn into a Ubisoft Toys-To-Life AssCreed Tower game,or think the only way to save the series is "do what XYZ 3rd Party entry did but betterer and biggerer this time!".You gotta re-introduce missing context in design philosophy and appeal to the average Switch owner.
Star Fox suffers from the same issue that Character Action games suffer from.CAG's, even dating back to DMC1, bank on the idea of shoving high production value, world building, characters and such,into a narrow interpretation of Beat Em Ups, which eventually snowballed to the point of Platinum Gamestrying their hardest to appeal to casuals who only care about these superficial elements.CAG's are dead. They're going the way of Rail Shooters.It's partially because CAG's tried really hard to have their cake and eat it, too,making for a vague representation of arcade design, but casuals don't care about any of that,so you swim upstream and make them as fancy and expensive as possible, because at the very least the Action RPG elements make them accessible to casuals.Dark Souls pretty much took that appeal completely by being a better RPG, and being affordable enough to make (not even dialogue animations)Star Fox is in that exact dilemma.Yes, I do think players who care about Star Fox the story/characters/world/presentation are just as useless for the survival of the genre as the examples above.Star Fox will never survive trying to represent the casuals who don't actually play it for the score chasing game that it is,because the production value and such cannot undo a complete and utter lack of interest in arcade design that fundamentally exists in its conception.
Arcade design is represented and cherished in modern times, but it happens devoid of literacy and experience in where that comes from.You will see people coming up with all kinds of things, like nuzlocke runs, finding all kinds of ways to arbitrarily turn games into more skill-based experiences.All of that has its roots in arcade design and never really lost relevancy, but the moment you look at Rail Shooters, Nintendo had all the levity.Nintendo makes a really damn good railshooter that kicks the living shit out of either Panzer Dragoons, in terms of scoring,but the large majority of Nintendo fans, who started playing SF64 weren't and still aren't interested in its core design. It's why I call it astroturf.Zero never had a chance, neither does Star Fox as a whole. Shmups are back, the deadest of genres, and yet it's healthier than a Nintendo franchise.
>>736247731Can't say I'm nostalgic, or even that familiar with Mario Galaxy's story, but from what little I've seen of it throwing in characters like Fox feels like a misunderstanding of what Mario Galaxy's story is supposed to be, and cheapens the tone. To me as an outsider, I get the sense that Mario Galaxy is supposed to be "charming but atmospheric" more along the lines of something like "The Last Unicorn." Part of me can't help but wonder if throwing in stuff like this is Shigeru Miyamoto deliberately trying to cheapen Mario Galaxy's story out of spite. But then again I haven't played the game or watched the movie, so I'd be curious if actual fans of the game feel similarly, or if I'm off the mark on this.
15 years of internet history and me talking to people who actively made videos about star fox,And the moment they start talking about "what is the appeal of star fox?"Star Fox kinda just shot itself in the foot by being such a casual console friendly experience.It allows people to take so many aspects of what they like about it, especially because it can be played at that casual level endlesslywithout ever engaging with the scoring system Nintendo's deverlopers clearly hoped people would engage with.So you end up wanting more of those characters, the world, the music, the story.Every element that was tacked on to the arcade rail shooter score chasing gameto make it a marketable product was as accessible as the gameplay on a skindeep levelYou can just play Star Fox 64 as a childrens game with little engagement of its deeper elements.That nostalgia gets people attached to all of its art assets and more superficial elements.
>>736247731Only thing you will be getting is either Star Fox 3DS port for the Switch 1/2 or a port of Star Fox Zero Wii U without the double screens.
>>736256965>not starfox command>not starfox zero with gyroscope aimingtoo good to be true, i don't belive it, there has to be something
>>736247731>NAME 3 STARFOX GAMES KID
>>736258280starfox 64starfox meleestarfox brawl
>>73625828064 and melee are the best star fox games, but assault is good too.
>>736247731Why is a grown ass man watching a fucking Mario movie?
>>736258280Lylat Wars
I'm already convinced the new game is going to be another Lylat Wars re imagining. For the entirety of Star Fox's history the only time they made a traditional on rails shooting game it was some kind of remake/reboot/re-imagining of that first gameWith the Ocarina of Time remake also being rumored at the same time, my bet is that it's a more straight re-make of Star Fox 64 rather than the more loose adaptation Zero was. Also, apparently there's supposed to be a Star Fox Adventures 2 they're working on? Is it more likely that Nintendo would have two completely original Star Fox games in development at the same time, or that Nintendo has a remake being made along side the more original title?
>>736258935>he says as he posts on 4chan
>>736259221>Also, apparently there's supposed to be a Star Fox Adventures 2 they're working on?What? Why? That's not even one of Nintendo's, that's a Rare game and Microsoft owns them now. Also it sucked
I don’t get why certain people find Fox attractive, he’s purely cool and a badass to me.
>>736253376Doggo Wife
Is asking for a Star Fox game where you have to manage the team, like making sure the teammates are happy, buying new equipment, negotiating contracts (which can either be you doing good or bad stuff) too much?So if your teammates are angry and stuff they peform worse, friendly fire you out of spite and even quit, making you have to hire new people. So you’d have to give’em a fair salary, maybe too little and they get mad, too much and they get lazy. If you break contract they just quit forever and stuff. You could also make it so you can chat with them after each mission and give them some feedback. Praising them too much would eventually make it seem fake or ignoring them would make them resentful.Buying cheap gear would make the arwing be clunkier, buying experimental gear could yield good but unpredictable results, black market gear is good but makes your criminal level higher.You could choose different kinds of contracts, that could either raise your honor level or something, which could eventually turn you into a wanted criminal.And all of these choices could change the way the main story goes.
>>736247731try telling that to half the games that got TV shows in the last 5 years
>>736260194>the next star fox should be like princess makerthis anon works at nintendo
>>736247731It’s been leaked over a week ago. It’s getting announced this months in a random Nintendo Today drop.
