I heard they bug your house, keep tabs on you and your family like scientologists, install remote viewers on your electronics and monitor you at all times if you work for them just so you don't leak anything about whatever game they're working on.
I assure you that they don't because this would be a legal nightmare and guarantee millions worth of compensation for every individual employee.
>>736303873Millions in compensation is nothing when you're working on a game that will make you billions.
>>736303873Non-millionaires don't have rights in the US
>>736304094What you're suggesting is still the most inefficient way to make sure no one leaks anything.They do the basic everyone does: extremely compartmentalized development process that ensures no single person has access to the whole package except for the higher ups, and making sure the whole package is only accessible in Rockstar's HQ, where their own computers are subject to immense surveillance.
>>736303873not OP but if they have any brains they might be doing some of the shit microsoft does and have a few bots dedicated to scouring the web for anything on social media related to confidential shit.Microsoft (before going full AI) has been rebuilding a large campus in Washington for years now, and they have bots scouring the web constantly to see if any of the construction workers post pictures of the 72 acre jobsite.People were getting fired for snapping a cool picture of the sunrise and posting it on facebook.
>>736304236That's different. They're just working with public information. It's fair game.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sBVNk1GUELQ
>>736304339Sure its differentbut its still a way to spy and see if you leak anything.Tell me anon, how hard would it be to dedicate some bots to JUST monitor known accounts of employees?To encourage employees to interact with rockstar social accounts on various platforms and check who shows up?You can do a LOT with public information.
>>736304442How is it spying if they're just viewing public information in public profiles?
>>736304576anon.if someone was following you around in public and watching everything you did in public...how would you NOT call it spying, or stalking?
>>736303787also if you work there for more than 8 years, managers will shit your work soo much that you will have a mental breakdown, throw your mug at the wall, start demolishing office and run away (come on R* faggots ask me how I know about this story)
>>736304648When I go to the market I am not publishing this moment for the world to see, I have a right to privacyIf I post a public picture on facebook in my public profile that's a different storyDon't want everyone to see it? Make the profile private
>>736304648but thats specifically YOU. They look for anything GTA 6 related in general.
>>736304778what do you mean, a right to privacy?no you don't.your location is open to be tracked and shared as data by various appsthe store is free to monitor youthey may even scan your face for personalized surge pricing in the near futureI asked how "if someone was following you around in public and watching everything you did in public" it WASNT spying or stalkingYou dodged the question>>736304864no. in my scenario preceding this comment >>736304576 I said the following >>736304442Microsoft's AI was snooping through EVERY PHOTO anyone posted on social media sights.I outlined an easy way to make a smaller net that WAS personalized to the accounts of employees of rockstar.
>>736304992Shut the fuck up ryan
>>736305118>now I gotta find out about yet another "named character" on this boardare you the one who dodged my question >>736304778the one who misunderstood what I said >>736304864or a third party?
>>736304992why would people post leaks on their personal accounts? You are retarded.
>>736305218>he doesnt knowmy dude.the amount of people who will leak shit over personal cloud storage, personal email aside, gen z has made a name of itself for leaking shit on their personal tik-tok posts and LLMs like chat-gpt.its absolutely worth it to keep up a small, focused net on employee known social media accounts these days.its not gonna cover everything, but it will grab the retards who might leak shit by accident.
Oh, and anyone chinese.Anybody chinese in origin absolutely has a sharp eye from security trained on them if rockstar has any sense in its security.The amount of emails that go around in big corporations to remind people of how untrustworthy and backstabbing chinks are, and how often china does long term corporate espionage are something else.
>>736304778>When I go to the market I am not publishing this moment for the world to see, I have a right to privacyI dunno about the rest of the world, but in the US, when you go out in public, you have no right to eye-level privacy.
>>736307419Where I live you can't record or photograph someone in a public place in a way that focuses them or makes the photo/video about them. Though it's no issue if they're in the background and the focus is at something else. Sounds janky but it works perfectly in practice. Those pranksters that try to harass others in public by recording them get rekt, everyone else lives their life normally.
>>736307568and what about the government?its easy for a place to ban civilian recordings while doing their own
>>736303787This is highly illegal, but corpos have been known to engage in dirty tricks for union busting
>>736307637The government does not record specific people going on about their daily lives as far as I know.
>>736307781I didn't say specific people.I am talking about recording you in public.That can be completely general.If you don't know just say so; don't avoid the question.Its not like I know what country you are from.
>>736307568So your country basically outlawed street photography, candid photography, and photojournalism? That doesn't sound free at all.
>>736307948Yes the government can record public streets, but so can anyone.
>>736308184You can with the target's consent.
>>736303787you literally just sign an NDA that says they'll own you if you screw them, this is enough for most things
>>736303787Every AAA company has a NDA and will screw you over if you break it
>>736308406If you have the subject's consent it's modeling photography. It's no longer street photography.How do newspaper photographers even operate in your country? If they take a compelling picture of a crime in progress they have to edit out all the people from the picture and render it meaningless?
