[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File deleted.
Have games ACTUALLY gotten worse over the last decade? Or do gamers just like to complain about everything
>>
>>736380689
That's a man
>>
wouldn't know, I haven't played anything in around a decade myself.
>>
>>736380689
Games bave gotten woke. There is less sex in it.

Remember when POPWW had a 2 sexy women in it? Very sexo.
>>
Play some old games as find out for yourself.
>>
>>736380746
which is probably why /v/ constantly talks about those old games from 2010-2015 instead of anything new.
>>
File: 1758811340644108.png (488 KB, 550x550)
488 KB
488 KB PNG
>>736380805
>those old games from 2010-2015
>>
>>736380804
There are just as many shitty old games as new ones. It’s just people only remember the good ones. No one remembers Army of 2
>>
Just compare FFVII to Remake

Original was a graphical powerhouse, had an incredible narrative, stunning drama and great character development

The Remake is literally not even a full game. It comes in three parts and each is censored.
>>
>>736380969
bet you can find a Skyrim thread on /v/ right now
bet you can find a New Vegas thread on /v/ right now
you may or may not find a Witcher thread on /v/ right now
you may or may not find a Mass Effect thread on /v/ right now
you may or may not find a Dragon Age thread on /v/ right now
>>
>>736380689
On average there was simply more soul. Look at stalker soc or dynasty warriors 3 both had fuck tons of problems but soul. And also not interested in appealing to ideology of California transgender marxists
>>
Writing is significantly worse and gameplay is dumbed down for casuals.
>>
>>736380969
Lel
>>
>>736381095
all the Souls games fit in that time span too, and I bet you'll find a thread on /v/
>>
>>736380689
No, the targeted audiences are just the largest and most varied they've ever been, and autists focus on the games they don't like at the exclusion of the games being released that they would like if they weren't such insufferable rage-addicted faggots.
>>
>>736380689
source of this semen demon?
>>
>>736381074
I remember Army of Two. It was mid. The old classics are great games and everyone should play them.
>>
>>736381095
nu-gaming started with sixth gen
nothing after 2006 is old
>>
>>736381186
The final redpill is realizing that “soul” is just nostalgia. That’s why millennials think the SW prequels are soulful
>>
>>736381285
then /v/ is nu-gaming site

>>>/vr/ is that way
>>
They actually have gotten worse and to argue otherwise is either genuine lack of knowledge or deliberate contrarianism.

Theres the nostalgiacunt argument that "i miss when all you had to do was put in a disc" but that goes further into things like install size, patching, support, optimization, availability on a modern platform. Games are both MADE like shit now and are intentional facsimiles of old shit whose creators have no current hand in.

Think about how every presentation now features multiple remasters and remakes and indie games in [Genre of the Generation] whereas E3 used to have comoletely random shit with its mandated FPS giants

ALL we get now, to be as succinct as possible are Movie Action Games, Indie PSP tier games and Remakes. With japan still miring in anime JRPGs and mobile oriented moneysinks
>>
>>736380689
i personally basically do not paly new games, hell, if you count Balatro and Vampire Survivor as """new games"""" I would say those were the last new games i played in the past 10 years. OK, CS2 is also a new game technically.... but at some point all games are just slight updates of the same shit I played 20 years ago. Diablo 2 ressurected? It basically existed in 2006 in the same form.
>>
>>736380689
shes cute. sauce?
>>
>>736381298
Not at all. Soul just meant a decent game without pretentious shit now its all lgbt transgender slop that everyone hates
>>
>>736381565
I don't even want new games, I'm already content. Like you said it's all just marginal improvement of what came before.
>>
>>736380689
She has solid looking tits
>>
Most publishers keep focusing on graphics and story instead of gameplay. And both of those are hard to do well and not what gamers care about so it's wasted effort and money.
Only the minority of game publishers care about making a good video game that gamers want.
I think that being the case is what causes the perception that games are getting worse, because there's a lot more bad ones a lot more often where I feel like the furhter back you go the trend was more that you get a few good games once in a while and really not that much inbetween and certainly not incomplete games sold on a promise combined with a perpetual "season pass". idk
>>
>>736381348
/v/ started in 04. If you joined afterwards yeah you are a newfag but the rest of us belong.
>>
File: recent.png (3.52 MB, 1407x1511)
3.52 MB
3.52 MB PNG
Well I dunno what to tell you. I've been gaming since the NES and theres very few games from the last decade I actually liked. Most of the games I liked would be from between the SNES era to the 360 era. Theres very few games from the PS4 and PS5 era that I cared about. These are the only games I can think of that I even somewhat liked and some of these I just thought was only "ok".You can say shit taste or whatever but I have played about 1000 games since the NES gen and I kept top 10 lists for a lot of those years so if you want I can post those to see how my taste may have changed or got worse over time.
>>
>>736381074
Wow if only there were pages that break down top top reviewed games by year.

And yeah they've gotten worse on average since wokeshit took off around 2010. If you look at top quality games for any given year they're generally less remarkable and have lower budgets.
>>
>>736381719
Thats what people were saying in 2004
>>
I've been playing games since around 1990 and it was 2014 when I noticed games got much worse and never recovered.
>>
theater kid infused artistic vision. conan is gay now, frodo is my comfort character and neuromancer is uncslop (but when i'm told to like it i'm gonna)
>>
Is this pornography?
>>
>>736382428
and they were right. in 2004 we had it all already.
>>
>>736380689
AAA games have gotten worse but indie games have gotten better so you could say it's been a lateral move, but also far more indie games come out than AAA ones ever did so it's a net increase in raw numbers of games worth playing.
>>
File: 1724956864588.jpg (414 KB, 1992x1022)
414 KB
414 KB JPG
>>736381719
gaming these days is just playing mods on top of 20 years old games. I played recently the ERA mod/modpack for heroes 3 and had a blast - everything you have ever wanted from a game, made by a fan, for free, running on any OS, on any hardware, even a 10 years old phone can run it at max settings.
>>
>>736381076
Both 7R games are full games. That's like saying Mass Effect 1 and 2 aren't full games when they are.
>>
>>736380689
Laura Fryer made a vid on this recently. Go watch it.
>>
>>736380689
I think gaming has gotten better over the last decade simply because things were REALLY shit between '06-16, of course this is only reflected if you play non-triple A games.
>>
>>736383081
im a boomer and only play big AAA games and they were all much better until about a decade ago when they decided to be shit and never went back to being good
>>
>>736383056
What would be a valid criticism of the 7R games?
>>
>>736380969
is that the white supremacist spic mutts worship?
>>
File: 1744182728804396.mp4 (2.41 MB, 640x362)
2.41 MB
2.41 MB MP4
>>736380689
>no results on googe
>no results on bing
>no results on yandex
>>
>>736380689
Please tell me this is porn
>>
>>736383329
Sorry Mario but all the reverse search engines have intentionally nerfed themselves for some reason idk why enjoy the modern internet
>>
>>736380689
They've been shit skinnerboxes for casuals since the late 2000s.
>>
>>736383235
Rent free
>>
>>736380741
That's my queen Sahaye
>>
>>736383329
This
>>736383440
>>
>Found it with lenso
>Those tats
Holy yuck
>>
They did for me. That is because the genre I most enjoy basically got split into two camps and fell off a cliff in variety for polished titles so its is now either le quirky indie title or srs bsns no walking on the grass types.
>>
>>736383234
I don't care about your opinion. What kind of autism is this?
>>
>>736383438
im not dissing, glad to see you guys have someone to relate to
if it wasnt for that guy how would the brown maga juanito diaz would be able to say they "hates minorities" just because he's 1/1000th spanish or something?
>>
yes. even the art for them has gotten ugly. games in the past had much better art. was there alot of bad art too? for sure but at least it was easier to find good art. this promo art for this random 90s japanese arcade game looks better than most stuff nowadays. and i think thats really sad. i thought we would get better art in the future not worse.
>>
>>736380689
Am I crazy or is that the bondage model Enchantress Sahrye? What a niche appearance on /v/
>>
>>736383329
Bing and Yandex used to be so good for reverse searching porn and now they are absolutely dogshit. Everything is dogshit.
>>
>>736380689
Both. There's way more nickel and diming and shitty practices now, but if you try to show a good game, people will just go nuh-uh and dismiss it.
>>
>>736383792
I didn't give you my opinion, and you haven't asked for it. If you want it you can have it, if you don't I won't tell you. I asked you what a valid criticism of the 7R games would be. Your response is odd.
>>
>>736384174
Gross.
>>
>>736380689
No, the good ones are actually better than ever, it's just they can't measure up with how fucked our brains have gotten from 24/7 dopamine rush from being online.
>>
In some ways, yes. Particularly monetization. Thew influx of
>F2P, so its okay if other stuff costs a fortune
>Its just cosmetic, its okay it it costs thousands or more to get all the items in the game
>Item malls from the K-MMO era to the Fortnite rotating store
>FOMO including Battle Passes that are both pay and exclusive/limited timed
>Lootboxes
>Mobile-style monetization / freemium garbage
>Gacha, the worst of all the above where you pay for even a chance at the things you want
have ruined much of gaming, and much of it worse and more recently in the past decade. There ARE ways to reasonably monetize titles that need consistent support, updates, GAAS etc.. but nobody wants to do that because they know that a whole generation is willing to kneel at trough of gacha style bullshit and the like. They only need to get a few people to spend a fortune to make up for a bunch of others not liking the game, so it makes everything worse.

In the old days we used to have
>Subscription
MMOs where the subscription meant you got ALL the in-game content including the cosmetics for the $10-15/month (possibly even less if you paid in blocks of time) plus the one-off cost of the game box/account which came with a month's play included. Every few years there would be a major expansion and buying that was again a one off, usually 1/2 to 2/3 as expensive as a full priced title, and sometimes a collector's edition/deluxe for a few bucks more, but that was it. That was how it should have been, but why would they bother when there are people who will fall over themselves to not only keep paying the sub, but buy the new outfits and mounts and other cosmetics month after month.
>>
>>736381074
nah dude, even the "classics" of today are as revered as they are because they revert back to how games used to be designed and they didn't jew their audience as a result
>>
>>736384227
thats not true at all lol. i can play a random ps2 game i have never played before and still get more enjoyment out of it. it doesnt help that modern games are ugly as fuck.
>>
>>736384110
You're asking for an opinion. I don't care enough about your opinion to provide mine. I've merely stated objectively that both 7R games are complete games, comparing them to Mass Effect. Again, what kind of overwhelming agenda-driven autism is this?
>>
>>736384174
Femdom is awesome, but I see that she also does bondage which is terrible.
>>
>>736384434
Someone told me there's a Barry-like guy who combs every thread for negative 7R posts and replies to "nuh uh" them no matter what was said.
They told me that if you ask them to say a single critical thing of those games the "BA7RY" will freak out and schizopost instead of answering the very simple question.

It appears to be true.
>>
>>736384227
>the good ones are actually better than ever
>>
Meh. Depends. I played Cyberpunk a while ago. It was fine. I had a good time. Never finished it, but it was entertaining enough. Tried E33. Dropped it. Forced myself to continue, regardless, after I realised I wouldn't be able to refund it. Played a few hours. Dropped it and never looked back. Then, I played Fallout 1 for the first time and had a blast(tm) for the first time in months. Then, I played Silksong and also had a blast(tm).

I think the problem is that everything just kinda looks too dull these days. People judge books by their covers and, so, if the covers sucks, which most game's covers do, then they aren't going to bother. Older games usually put effort into making their games look cool. Then again, on average, then, yes, games have gotten worse.
>>
>>736384546
Ah, yes. "Someone." So you're this level of schizo, huh? I haven't shared a single opinion, and you're asking for one. Aren't you going to provide your reasoning for why you think an objective statement like this is >>736383056 is "Barry like" defense of the game?

Seems like you're the one having a mental collapse when faced with 7R wrongthink.
>>
>>736380689
What what is here its gone
>>
>>736384793
I asked for your opinion and you told me you don't care about mine and that's why you don't want to tell me yours. Very strange.
Since you don't care about what I think AND don't want to tell me what you think, why even ask me any questions? Just ignore me if you don't want to say anything.

Nice talking to you, BA7RY.
>>
File: 1766988081794481.png (597 KB, 1266x972)
597 KB
597 KB PNG
>>736383440
>Sahaye
link? google's giving me nothing
>>736383387
>>736383907
it really is a shame what we've come to as a society
>>
>>736384952
You have 7R derangement syndrome. Look at your response to a simple factual statement. Your mind can't possible process it and immediately defaults to schizobabble and boogeymen. Take your meds, you unhinged monkey.
>>
>>736385046
Do you correct people who say positive things about 7R with factual statements, BA7RY?
>>
>>736385173
>>736385046
Both of you need to shut up
>>
>>736385173
I corrected a factually wrong comment, resulting in your unraveling. Which you responded to virtually within a post cooldown. Says a lot about you. Go howl at the moon, you absolute lunatic.
>>
>>736380689
This era...has produced a few tech demo open world expensive ACslops. Though that kinda leans on the ACslops of the past era per definition. None did it for me but hypothetically, there's gotta be a good one that's non-woke non-f2p that someone with nostalgia might come to like. If we go back two eras, the one ACslop around was oot and wow. That leaves 2d games. Not to mention the ratio of slop to gold increased too much.
I'm not convinced. That's still too low. Maybe. Probably past eras win this.
>>
>>736380689
Someone post the OP image again. File was deleted before I got the full size version.
>>
>>736385263
Good thing you don't care about my opinion, BA7RY.
Keep an eye out for positive 7R posts that need a factcheck. Don't just do it to negative posts, mister objective!
>>
>>736385383
That post suggested they're unfinished games. I corrected that misconception, which was factually incorrect. You're having an insane schizo-like meltdown as a result, almost immediately defaulting to screeching at boogeymen. You're mentally ill. I can tell this is something you, ironically get called a schizo for regularly. What a complete fucking loser, lol. Keep monitoring /v/ for wrongthink, 7R derangement syndrome-kun.
>>
>>736383234
holy shit he lost his fucking mind over this post
>>
>>736385629
haha yeah fr fr we run this place
>>
>>736385576
Seems you've been called BA7RY before. Not surprising.
>>736385629
He did, the test worked amazingly well.
>>
>>736385704
You need to do some self-reflection. You responded to a comment within a post cooldown and immediately starting raving about boogeymen. Despite the post you responded to merely providing a neutral, objective statement.
https://arch.b4k.dev/v/search/text/%22BA7RY%22/
kek holy shit, you're relentless.
>>
>>736383234
This simple question has resulted in seven schizoposts (so far)
This melty is fascinating. And he claims to not care what anyone else thinks.
>>
>>736385629
Why was that question so upsetting? Theres lots of bad things you could say about those games
>>
>>736386147
Yeah. Yours. As the archives show, you've done this religiously, going harder than ever starting in January of 2026. This is Barry-tier mental illness, alright. You were here to respond IMMEDIATELY. In a thread not even related to the subject which you pursue. Now you're convincing yourself, as is the norm for people with your affliction, that your boogeyman, has, indeed, come to grace you with their presence. Pretty funny that you'll now spend the next hours samefagging nonstop in this thread.
>>
>>736386328
>In a thread not even related to the subject which you pursue.
Yeah good thing you were here to destroy 7R critics with facts and logic even though it wasn't about 7R. Barry himself would be proud.
>>
>>736386328
The ba7ry test is a simple way to check if ba7ry is in a thread and it worked and exposed you again. This "who me?" act will fool nobody.
>>
>>736386420
>>736386469
I merely browsed interesting threads and responded to a comment hours later. Schizzy here instantly responded to wrongthink and started ranting about schizos.
>>
>>736386469
If he actually wanted to prove he's not BA7RY he could say one critical thing about the 7R games. But because he's BA7RY he literally can't do that. That's why the test works so well.

In b4 another schizo rant about why he's going to refuse to prove us all wrong... because even though he could, he won't... and that means he's right and we're wrong. Somehow. Also everyone is autistic and schizo aside from him*

*the guy who is now writing his 12th rant about how he doesn't care about our opinion which also MUST be proven wrong
>>
>>736386595
Wrongthink? But you only stated a fact. Unless you... oh ba7ry you goofed!
>>
>>736386692
Yes, exactly. Anything that can be perceived as a defense, even though mere fact checking, is wrongthink in the eyes of this crazy person. Just look at the responses.
>>
>>736386637
You were right
>>
>>736386757
You went insane because someone asked you if there were any valid criticisms of 7R on a videogame discussion board.
>>
>>736387172
BA7RY tends to do that
>>
>>736387193
>>736387172
>>736387054
The pattern starting to emerge here is that you're discord buttbuddies engaging in shitposting together. Why would two people who regularly engage in this exact form of shitposting find one another in a completely unrelated thread to start this public display of validating each other on cooldown? Haha, or the mental illness runs deep and you're heavily invested in these narratives to the point of running multiple browsers and 4chan passes. I know of a general that has this exact type of deranged posters.
>>
>>736386637
uncanny
>>
>>736387574
Ok ba7ry very cool
>>
>>736381076
Conversely one could say the original had an overambitious script which was delivered half finished, and the remakes simply did what any competent studio would've done after the mistakes of FF7 and made it a trilogy.

Of course of they made each portion like 10-15 hours long without all the filler bullshit, that would've been even better.
>>
>>736387643
All because you interpreted an objective statement as a defense of 7R, demanding criticism to put your mind at ease. Crazy. And you had so many pals to conveniently start providing validation and confirmation bias! Wow!
>>
>>736387893
>>736387172
>>
>>736387893
Ok ba7ry we get it the question made you mad
>>
>>736387958
>All because you interpreted an objective statement as a defense of 7R, demanding criticism to put your mind at ease.
>>
>>736387893
Would you ever set a fan of 7R straight with an objective statement if their positive post wasn't based in fact?
>>
Thanks for ruining the thread you guys.
>>
>>736388238
Final Fantasy VIIR fanboys are next level autism. Thread was bound for ruin the second anyone dared to criticize their game.
>>
>>736388238
Barry and Ba7ry are notorious for this
>>
>>736388094
I would post facts if facts are factual. Either 7R game being unfinished is factually incorrect. See, this is your derangement. You see something, interpret it as a defense, then demand criticism for some unfathomable reason. 7R derangement syndrome. You seek out posts with even a hint of perceived wrongthink and go to town with your catchphrases, which you're too dumb to see identifies you.
>>
>>736388356
>>736388312
Just don't fucking engage then. Holy fuck why you people ALWAYS take the bait. So dumb. Just stop responding then we can continue talking about what the thread is actually about.
>>
>>736388431
>demand criticism
No, you were asked for a valid criticism of the games. And you have made it very clear you are unable to provide one. That's all we needed to know, Ba7ry.
>>
>>736388540
What relevance does it have? I said I don't care about subjectivity. I provided an objective, factually correct statement about the games. Then you demanded criticism in response. Within a post cooldown, by the way. Such is your mental illness.
>>
>>736388529
What bait? Nobody is taking his bait. He's exposed and being mocked. He's just chimping out as usual. Barry and Ba7ry are lolcows.
>>
>>736388614
>What relevance does it have?
You've been malding over the question you don't care about for an hour and a half.
>>
>>736388729
kek the BA7RY test works every time
>>
>>736386637
This post is only getting better
>>
>>736388773
>>736388729
Wow, such an organic chain of responses! You've yet to actually respond to the points raised here. >>736388431

Why would you request criticism in response to someone providing an objective statement, within a post cooldown no less? Well, Ba7ryposter? Is it just 7R derangement syndrome or do you have an actual logical response?
>>
>>736388650
Which is just needless bickering between you two muddying up the thread with your irrelevant bullshit. As an outsider looking in you guys are annoying as fuck. Nobody cares.
>>
>>736388995
>Nobody cares.
Especially not >>736388947 who just wrote his 24th schizopost about it.
>>
>>736388947
It's not logical to mald for 2 hours over being asked if a videogame has any flaws on a videogame discussion board
>>
>>736389108
True...
>>
>>736389108
>>736389123
Another organic pair of responses. You're gonna have to address the question you've been asked instead of just repeating yourselves (I'm being generous in assuming it's Discord buttbuddies and not samefagging).
>>
>>736389191
>You're gonna have to address the question you've been asked instead of just repeating yourselves
Hmmmm now what's funny and ironic about you saying this? Can you even hear yourself?
>>
>>736389326
I know! It's funny and ironic because he's the one refusing to answer a question for 2 hours and just repeating himself, right?
>>
>>736389367
Ding ding ding!
>>
Here comes the "I'm out" since he knows he's fucked himself into a corner. Victory announcement imminent
>>
>>736389326
>>736389367
>>736389389
I've already provided reasoning. >>736387574. Are you gonna answer the question? Why did an objective statement illicit this response in you? To request criticism. Don't forget, within a post cooldown. In an unrelated thread removed from your usual shitposting grounds.
>>
>>736384984
>Enchantress Sahrye
>>736383440
>>736385380
>>736383329
People here like to post these images thinking sauce is something to keep for themselves.
>>
>>736389480
I know why. Mental illness.
>>
>>736389524
DING DING DING DING
>>
>>736389480
>Are you gonna answer the question?
Tell you what anon, fair's fair, I'll answer you once you answer >>736383234
You were asked first, after all. 2 hours ago.
Please address the question instead of repeating yourself, then I will happily do the same.
>>
>>736389564
You are just as bad derailing the whole thread too.
>>
He won't.
He can't.
He's BA7RY.
>>
>>736389508
Thank you, anon. Do you have the OP image? It was really nice.
>>
>>736389683
>>736389770
Thing, is, that has no relevance to the post he's responding to, which is merely relaying objective information. Why would that cause someone to demand criticism? Well?
>>
>>736389791
Oh no! You simply repeated yourself instead of answering the question!
>>
>>736389845
You're not in a position to use NO U here. My post is the one that's been met with a seemingly random question, for no apparent reason. Why ask it?

Is it because you interpreted it as a defense of the game, which you won't tolerate, and thus demand criticism be provided or you'll brand them with the schizo label that ironically has outed you specifically?
>>
>>736389960
You're gonna have to address the question you've been asked instead of just repeating yourselves
>>
>>736389960
>You're gonna have to address the question you've been asked instead of just repeating yourselves
>>736383234
>>
>ba7rys way of proving the ba7ry test doesnt work is to have a two hour meltie about it
Think of what a normal human being would think of that question and look at all this autism
>>
>>736390097
>>736390006
>>736389986
More organic mass-shitposting replies to this very specific topic in a completely unrelated thread. Wow!
>My post is the one that's been met with a seemingly random question, for no apparent reason. Why ask it?
Feel free to respond, or I'll assume this to, indeed, be factual.
>Is it because you interpreted it as a defense of the game, which you won't tolerate, and thus demand criticism be provided or you'll brand them with the schizo label that ironically has outed you specifically?
>>
>>736389960
>You're not in a position to use NO U here.
I am actually because it's so perfectly fitting
>>736390250
Ok ba7ry that's cool but >>736383234
>>
>>736390250
I'll answer all your questions once you answer >>736383234
>>
>>736390321
>My post is the one that's been met with a seemingly random question, for no apparent reason. Why ask it?
inb4 the discord samefag brigade, LOL.
>>
>I don't care about your opinion.
>spends 2 hours demanding answers
Man BA7RY really is a fuckin schizo loser. How does he explain this behaviour "logically"?
>>
>>736390401
Looks like you were asked that question because they knew you were a schizo and they hit a bullseye
>>
>>736390486
>>736390390
Feel free to explain why an objective statement made you demand a list of criticisms in response. Well?
>>
>>736390525
Nope, I have plenty of issues with 7R. It just has no relevance, because I merely provided an objective statement and left it at that. Then schizobro demanded criticism and here we are. Takes two to tango. Or three, let me be generous. Here we are, indeed.
>>
>>736390530
You don't care about my opinion, why are you asking?
>>
>>736390616
>Nope
lol
2 hours malding for no reason then?
>>
>>736390938
An explanation isn't an opinion, doofus. Are you really this intellectually limited? Have we reached the limits of your shitposting ability? This is fucking sad.
>>736390969
Wow, one after the other. How organic.
>>
I have never in my life been asked so many questions by a guy who doesn't care about my opinion
>>
>>736391039
you're a loser ba7ry
>>
>>736390616
>I have plenty of issues with 7R
Name one
>>
>>736391071
You're not being asked for an opinion. You're being asked to explain yourself. This answer would also retroactively explain every single one of your responses.

You responded to an objective statement with a request for criticism of the game, which is wholly unrelated to the post. Well?

Another chain of very organic validating shitposts, by the way. In an unrelated thread! You've found your way! Wow!
>>
>>736391147
How DARE you DEMAND that
Take several hours of schizoposting instead!
>>
>>736391182
You are a loser ba7ry. One simple question made you this insane.
>>
>>736391218
>>736391258
Why did you respond to an objective statement with a request for a list of unrelated criticisms? Well?
>>
>>736386637
I hope you're seeing this kek
>>
>>736391321
You're gonna have to address the question you've been asked instead of just repeating yourself
>>
>>736391364
>>736391346
The question is irrelevant until you explain its relevance. It's an off-topic response demanding criticism. Why?

>Why did you respond to an objective statement with a request for a list of unrelated criticisms? Well?
>>
>>736391321
Could you tell us one of the issues you have with 7R? You mentioned having plenty. I think if we knew one it would help us move the conversation forward.
>>
I will never doubt the BA7RY TEST again
>>
>>736391443
>>736391470
See >>736391439

I've seen you employ this flooding tactic in several threads in the past. It's been illuminating.
>>
>>736391439
>You're gonna have to address the question you've been asked instead of just repeating yourself
>>736383234
>>
>>736391529
Not your first rodeo eh ba7ry?
>>
>>736391557
I've never engaged with you. Only observed this exact behavior in FF-related threads. I don't think you thought this through very well. Here we are in a completely unrelated thread, and you've gone all out with your rampant samefagging and fake engagement. It makes no logical sense for you to organically gather here of all places. Curious. And illuminating.
>>
Why is he pretending anyone demanded a list of criticism? We can all see the post hes trying to misrepresent. I thought this guy cared about objectivity.
>>
>>736391679
The king of logic has also spent over two hours angry about the opinions of people he doesn't care about. He doesn't want to answer any questions but demands his be answered. It's a full on autism tantrum.
>>
>>736391679
>>736391759
>*objective statement*
>unrelated post asking for "valid criticism" of 7R
>20+ posts referring back to this post asking over and over again
>refuses to answer what relevance it has to the post it's responding to
>>
>>736391673
You were asked a question and went insane and everyone saw it. You'll do it again the next time you see the question. And then more people will be aware of your mental illness and dishonesty.
>>
>>736391848
See >>736384434
Now, explain what relevance it has before your next flood of totally organic responses, dear schizo.
>>
>>736391824
>asking for
Hey, wasn't it demanding? I guess you accepted you were being dishonest about that one.
>>
>>736391901
Haha, speaking of dishonest... >>736391673 care to take a crack at explaining such a happy coincidence?
>>
>>736391895
Whats the relevance of what? Discussing videogames on /v/?
>>
>>736391895
whats the relevance of your 2 and a half hour melty over nothing
>>
I'd heard this question >>736383234 gives BA7RY an aneurysm and it seems to be true
>>
>>736391963
>>736392001
>>736392178
>Whats the relevance of what? Discussing videogames on /v/?
What relevance does requesting "valid criticism" have in response to an objective statement?
>>736392001
>whats the relevance of your 2 and a half hour melty over nothing
Big oof @ the self-awareness here, chief. You've made a fatal mistake this day. You've revealed your unmitigated mental illness. You're at best a duo of Discord toddlers engaging in this behavior for hours at a time, consistently, or gone so far off the deep end you're samefagging using various post cooldown-bypassing methods, such as alternate browsers, phoneposting and 4chan pass, or any combination thereof.

You should've thought this one through. This isn't a thread where you'd be able to sell this as organic shitposting, and now you've revealed yourself. Imagine attempting to call ANYONE else a schizo or boogeyman of any kind when you unironically engage in this behavior. You'll continue to deflect and flood, but I know. Thank you for this knowledge.
>>
>>736386637
You seeing this?
>>
File: Sonic Totem.jpg (311 KB, 735x720)
311 KB
311 KB JPG
>>736380689
>Have games ACTUALLY gotten worse over the last decade?

AAA games have. Graphics have stagnated or gotten worse while using substantially more resources. The quality of devs and coders seems to have gone down while development costs have gone up. The industry is screwed.

Smaller devs are doing fine though. Plenty of good games to still play; but less and less reason to invest in top tier graphics cards which I guess is a good thing since they're all being bought up by Data Centers to generate AI porn of Judy Hopps.
>>
>>736380689
>Have games ACTUALLY gotten worse over the last decade?
The decline has been happening for 20 years.
>>
>>736392496
>What relevance does requesting "valid criticism" have in response to an objective statement?
It was to test if you're ba7ry. You do know the ba7ry test, yes? And considering what a good job it did I think the relevance is clear to see.
Now I have answered your question.
>>
>>736392556
Case in point. Another demonstration. I see you, and I won't forget. You revealed too much. I'll be referring back to this thread in the archives if I bump into you again, which is inevitable given how mentally ill you are. Until next time, schizo-kun. I know.
>>
>>736392496
Now that you've won can you tell us one valid criticism of the 7R games?
>>
>>736392663
Later, BA7RY!
>>
File: youretard1.png (106 KB, 546x443)
106 KB
106 KB PNG
there haven't been many good games in the last decade but you guys should try the Hello Charlotte trilogy anyway
>>
>spent 2 and a half hours having a schizo melty over a simple question
>vows to continue malding about it in future threads
And he was calling OTHERS autistic. Very amusing.
>>
File: 1775081166291222.png (672 KB, 1280x720)
672 KB
672 KB PNG
>>736380689
Fuck no, I LOVED JRPG 2024. Last year did not impress me though, and we are off to a rough start.
>>
File: Crystalisboxart.jpg (40 KB, 250x356)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>736380689
2015-2018 was the high point in gaming. 2019-2021 was a low point, 22-24 great, now meh. Games are worse but just becuase 15 - 18 was unreal good and I was a kid with all the systems in the 94 - 2001 era.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.