You should be able to solve this.
>>736417761right
>>736417804no wait, it's top
click anyof them then reload when it's wrong
>>736417761humans having spatial awareness in 2026? thats asking abit too much
>>736417761yes
>>736417761It doesn't come naturally, i have to bend my mind out of shape. Answer is L-shape.Happens to me in Factorio when i do abstract arithmetic for circuit conditions. I fiddle until i understand the machine but my mind springs back so i forget everything and i have to relearn each time i do it again. Never sinks in.What's this phenomenon, a learning disability?
>>736420014it is called being dumb
>>736417761It's right
>>736417867You had it right the first time, dummy
>>736420157Noo..
>>736417761I just select at random because it is 2026 and I know that such a puzzles won't have any effect in game
>>736417761Looks like up to me. You need to rotate the second shape so that it fits into the back of the first shape.
>>736420608except you drew the second piece wrong
>>736420608That's not rotating it, that's changing the shape all together
>>736420756He dechiralled the shape.
>>736417761>pretend that you solved the puzzle
>>736420608Big mistake, lad.Because the 2nd shape can never become the middle shape in your image.No matter which single-block side you stand it on, the triple always tiles clockwise, not counter-clockwise.The solution is the L shape.
>>736420608meds
>>736417761You know, spatial puzzles really kind of suck without any tactile interaction. Like, you have to be seriously bored to get anything out of a digital Rubik's cube.
>>736417761Isometric L block + Isometric L block + ??? = Isometric Cube
>>736420608here you go anon. You just tip the front left side of the second block up to the top side.
>>736417761Down is the only one that makes sense to me
>>736421478Nevermind, I see my misstake
>>736417761Once you realize all the solution pieces are on a flat plane, the only way forward is to make a 2x3 plane from your two given blocks. From there's it's easy
>>736417761disingenuous puzzlefirst of all they present first two pieces not in the correct position for combination, so you have to guess if you should rotate them or not in your head for the presented solutionsecond you cannot see 2 blocks on the final image
>>736422486>so you have to guess if you should rotate them or not in your head for the presented solutionNo you don't, if you weren't "allowed" to rotate them it simply wouldn't be solvable.>second you cannot see 2 blocks on the final imageThat's also irrelevant because none of the wrong answers would let you pull off even just the visible side of the final shape.
>>736417761I was so happy I got this right.
>>736417761I think you flip the second piece upside down and pick the piece on the right
>>736417761It's the top one. The two pieces slot into each other to form a cube, then you add the other part to the side to make a rectangle.
>Final question is the easiest.
>>736417761ay yo @grok solve this shit
>>736427178
>>736417761rightlow iq spatially unaware retards need not apply
>>736417761unrelated to this question but I hate this twin already
>>736417761I got it with right but it took me like 5 minutes of trying different combinations just rotating shit in my head.I'm good with math but bad with geometry, idk.
