Which one is harder?
>>736426671RE3, is so fucking bad that is harder to keep playing knowing is going to suck
>>7364266712 with the mod that makes Mr X haul ass like Nemesis does in 3
RE3 is designed to be harder in the same way NES games were. They know the game is short/lacking content so they increase the challenge to account for that. Having said that, if you're playing on standard and don't engage with the dodge mechanic at all, then the game is still pretty easy. You only get resistance when you try to learn perfect dodge. But then when you've mastered it it's ez again.
post best Jill mods. NOW
>>736426671RE2. Because unlike RE3 which you're only forced to stomach once, you're forced to stomach 2 twice.
>>736426671RE3, easily. It actually requires you to be good at the game on higher difficulties. RE2 is extremely easy, even on hardcore.
>get remake trilogy on discount on ps5>let's see what's all the rave is about>6-7 bullets to stop a zombie, in constant ammo drought, just running past enemies>always on the run from an unkillabale giganiggaDunno, I dont get it.
>AAA>hardlol, they are made for cazzies and nostalgic boomers who dont have free time or reflexes anymore even the 'puzzles' are dumbified in typical AAA fashion
>>736426671I had more fun doing a no heal s+ run, having to redo the birkin, escape sequence and tyrant fight when hit. Than I did just fighting re3's final bossGenuinely the most poorly designed boss fight I've played in years.
>>736426671Wow, I just beat 2 the other day and 3 like 20 mins ago. The most annoying shit about 3 is the god awful nemesis boss fights
re3 on inferno is ridiculous without infinite rocket through the whole gamein re2 only hard part is the sewers on hardcore since thats the only part when game can bullshit you and there's lots of rng
>>736429017soulslike
