>this game aged badly>plays the same as it did when released???
>>736452462That typically means that there isn't enough "quality of life" that was introduced by later games in the series/genre.
>>736452462my theoretical favorite Mother game is Mother 2 with Mother 3's QoL design
>this game lacks replayability>can start a new game just fine???
>>736452462Nobody uses the phrase this way but there's a lot of old DOS games that run like absolute shit on modern hardware or have weird graphical glitches which is a legitimate case of not aging well. I tried to play Divine Divinity a few years ago and it was all fucked up
What's the appeal of Kirino?
>this car works perfectly fine it's YOUR problem if you have issues with it today
It's what normalfags say
sister sexo
Retards, it means the same game's mechanics were made better in future games
>>736452462>game has high replayability>everyone is still running the same save from a decade ago
>>736452462>play game X in year 1>nothing plays like it, it's good>play game Y in year 5>iterates on X, polishes it, gets rid of annoying quirks>play game Z in year 10>perfects the X formula, zero friction on the gameplay, controls perfectly >go back to playing game X in year 10>it plays like shit now since you already already used to better playing games like Z
Oreimo thread?
>>736454459kys, anime pics are not an attempt to off-topic
>>736454459
