>Literally the only remaster that nobody can find a flaw
>>736516454Portraits are bad and they fucked up the old graphics so you don't have a choice to go back. There
>>736516454Fixed valkyries still suck.
It has some flaws, the most important is the netcode (it could be a bit faster)
>>736516454>promised 2v2 ladder that still isn't in the game>colors are less distinguishable>new graphics aren't very goodMostly good though, I'll give you that.
>>736516651>new graphics arent good
>>736517814The new graphics are good but not as good as the old graphics, which are just classic. Widescreen is very nice though I'll give you that.Also some of the designs were changed for the worse.
>>736516454Only marines/zerglings/zealots is really fun
>>736517921i agree some design changes for unit portraits specifically are a little worse, but overall i feel it's much better than the original.
>>736517921>Widescreen is very nice though I'll give you that.We had that in the 2000s with mods, though it did standardize the 16:9 viewing perspective competitively which was a good thing.
>>736517921>Widescreen is very niceLiterally the only redeeming point of the remaster.
