>Finally defeat Artemis, Beast of the Sacred Blood, after going through 3 boss phases>Dickhead incel snipes you at the extraction point and steals the boss lootI can already predict this shit will flop hard, Marathon style. People barely tolerate cringelord metagaming invaders in Souls games, let alone in a game that resets your progress,
>multiplayer focusStrike 1>PVP sloppaStrike 2>console exclusive Strike 3You're out
You've got the nintendo cultists and souls cultists to both think this.
>>736575538>ExtractionI'm glad this shit isn't coming to PC, give us a real game.
>>736575538>extraction soulslike
>>736575538Me in the middle
>>736575538I can't fucking wait
>me and the lads farming it up duskblood trying our first boss kill>ongbal and the goons gank us, we get wiped>I see myself in ongbals latest videoKINO
>>736575538The more I see this game, the shittier it gets
>>736575538>Extraction shooterI can't wait to see the dad gamers seethe that some guy named INCEL88 killed them in a PVP game
It's actually a very good thing this is a Nintendo switch 2 exclusive, because i'm fucking tired of multiplayer slop. Game will 100% die faster than Nightreign and people will end up forgetting sooner thanks to the fact of being stuck on only 1 platform
>>736576135nightreign is currently only played by cheater chinks anyway, i dont know why they love the game so much
>>736575742Holy cancer
I really hope whatever other game fromsoftware end up making after Duskblood not only ends up being a single player game, but also has a noticeable upgrade in their engine. I'm fucking tired of every new game that they have looking like a Dark Souls 3 DLC
>>736576181>cheater chinksit's all so tiresome.
>>736575538This is a retarded direction to take a Nintendo exclusive.
>>736576270Elden Ring already had outsourcing to indians for assets (credits confirm this), do you want their dev cycle to be even more expensive and bloated just so the game can look closer to a generic UE5 slop game, the end point of all realistic graphics in games?There is nothing wrong with visuals in Souls games, leave it be, not broken so why fix it.
>>736576332Thats what i was thinking. Them making a extraction "shooter" is fine, but being exclusive to nintendo seems retarded when the people who like that genre are all pc players.
>>736576332>>736576390It doesn't help that Nintendo has absolutely garbage multiplayer
>>736576332It's retarded that it isnt just Nintendo's Bloodbourne exclusive roll-slop. If this shit ends up being online only, it might as well not exist.
>FromSoft multiplayer extraction game exclusive to the platform with the absolute shittiest onlineThis is like shooting yourself in the foot before an uphill battle. This game seems set up to fail
>>736576375>Elden Ring already had outsourcing to indians for assets (credits confirm this), do you want their dev cycle to be even more expensive and bloated just so the game can look closer to a generic UE5 slop game, the end point of all realistic graphics in games?Drop the Open world bullshit entirely, it's the worst part about ED anyway. Also everything else sounds like a skill issue from their part, i don't want my games to look like a DLC from a game that came out 10 years ago>There is nothing wrong with visuals in Souls games, leave it be, not broken so why fix it.Capcom manages to improve their graphics for RE games and even add stuff like the blood physics for RE9 they only suck at open world, why can't Fromsoftware improve?
>>736575538Late April fools prank OP?
>/v/ in 2011LMAOOO GET BAGGED ON SCRUB *Well What Is It pose*>/v/ in 2026NOOOOOOOO REMOVE THE PVP REMOVE INVASIONS IT HURTS MY FEELINGSWhat the absolute fuck happened?
>>736576562Being a Souls like extraction game really sounds like a joke
The concept of "go out into the world, obtain items, and then return to base without dying or you lose everything" was not invented by extraction shooters. It's been around for decades, in MUDs and MMOs. Even Minecraft works like that.What extraction shooters have brought to the table is dogshit PvP-rewarding mechanics that discourage cooperation.
>>736576624There's nothing wrong with PvP invasions. You die, you come back, you try again.Now imagine if PvP invasions caused you to lose your entire inventory. That's fucking retarded.
>>736575538>People barely tolerate cringelord metagaming invaders"You didn't beat the ga-ACK"
>>736576624No community servers. 3rd world getting internet access. Companies slapping on kernel malware instead paying for server costs.
>>736576675You lose your humanity if you die to an invasion, dumbfuck.
>>736576549>Drop the Open world bullshit entirelyI agree>why can't Fromsoftware improve?Because everything in life has it's drawbacks. In reality things are not so simple as saying pour more money into From and they will improve on all aspects.All dev teams are good at some things and bad at others, From is good at combat and art direction, but not great at performance and visual fidelity. That's just how it is. And nowadays be glad we get any good games at all>i don't want my games to look like a DLC from a game that came out 10 years agoI do because I'm not a GPU goyim who spends 1k+ for every new shitbox Nvidia sharts out yearly. Graphics don't make a game look good anyway. Without good art graphics are nothing
>>736576637>fetch quest, but with actual friction because players are a threat unlike NPCsSounds right up /v/s alley, honestly.>>736576728Point to me where the Kernel malware is on the Switch 2.
>>736576756He never said you don't.
>>736576624Maybe I would be fine with multiplayer features if most invaders weren't cheating third worlders trying to brick my save
>>736576756That's not your entire inventory.All you lose is souls and humanity. Currency. Not items.
>>736576562>>736576630I mean the source doesn't exist.
>>736575538>ExtractionHard pass. I'm still mad that Hunt turned into that shit. I'll probably die mad that Hunt became what it is instead of the L4D clone it was supposed to be.
>>736576829Having a "Fetch quest with risky cooperation" is a good idea. But many extraction shooters simply encourage the player to shoot-on-sight, which isn't fun for most players.Duskbloods not having ranged weaponry might help though. You may be able to cooperate with people and not worry that they're going to headshot you from half a mile away after you're done working together.Basically, I'm saying that the problem with extraction shooters is the "shooter" part. Without guns, I think it can work.
>>736576773>Because everything in life has it's drawbacks. In reality things are not so simple as saying pour more money into From and they will improve on all aspects.All dev teams are good at some things and bad at others, From is good at combat and art direction, but not great at performance and visual fidelity. That's just how it is. And nowadays be glad we get any good games at allThey have more than 10 years to do all that with all the money in the world after that many games with huge success, and sorry i don't wanna see another company to be like Bethesda.>I do because I'm not a GPU goyim who spends 1k+ for every new shitbox Nvidia sharts out yearly. Graphics don't make a game look good anyway. Without good art graphics are nothingNeither do i, reason why they should improve their own engine in a way that doesn't kill performance. A gook studio from a MMO game managed to do that with Crimson Desert, RE9 ran on my computer with 120 FPS (without framegen) and 180 FPS (with Framegen), all of that with a 3060 TI.
No one is going to buy this shit on a Tendie console. It's Devil's Turd all over again.
>>736577254This, tendies are the most casual gamers on earth they'll scream and cry if you kill them in a pvp game
>>736576876The source for the article?https://gamerant.com/the-duskbloods-extraction-game-twist-pvpve-co-op-endings/
>>736575538>>736575618>>736575667>>736576002>>736576097>>736576547I should start screencapping you retards for grudge posts.Say it with me:Miayzaki.Doesn't.Miss.
>>736576270Fromsoft's graphics should stay where they are because their games look great via art direction rather than chasing resolution. AC6 and Elden Ring's DLC run on GTX1000 series GPUs and look 'better' and much more interesting than most other action games with twice the performance requirements because they focus on art direction and visual style over pure asset complexity. There's no reason for a 3rd Person ARPG where you can't see anything up close unless you shove your camera into a wall or whatever, to care that deeply about texture resolution or complex facial animations.
>>736578507Which games were his and which weren't?
>snoys posting fud because nintendo is getting another exclusive
>>736576637>>736577018Extraction shooters are popular because "Free For All But There Are Stakes" is a strong format in a basic sense. Playing COD FFA or PUBG was always very fun. But adding the extra anxiety that your performance dictates your future strength, and then giving you a release valve in being able to escape early, and then upping the anxiety again by making the escape routes fixed and known, is a great triple edged sword that really hooks people in. This is why Tarkov did so well. Then people realized the format and that anxiety-release-anxiety wombo combo works in other genres, too.
>the japs will have perfect net >the rest of the world will be playing against china and australiaNice
>>736575538>incelRENT-FREE lmao
>>736575618fpbpand it didn't even need to add>EIGHT PLAYER BATTLE ROYALE
>>736575618
>>736578824>Played with other Americans in DeS and it was usually great>Everything afterward is dudes going into the room I was previously in and swinging at the air and damaging me
>>736575538Miyazaki is high on his own supply. PVP in the souls games has always been mediocre at best, and completely garbage at worst- Always lots of buggy mechanics like the bow glitch which never get fixed- The presence of even a little bit of latency ruins most sense of fair gameplay. This is a game where dodges and parries have a duration of around 10 frames. Its well known that most successful parries in pvp are from predicting your opponent will strike, not from seeing an attack coming and parrying at the exact right time, because the latter is impossible with latency.- In most pvp games, you dont need to depend on 1v1s to have a fair fight, if there are more enemies than you it's not impossible to win if you play smartly. In souls games if you try to fight 3 on 1 you just get stunlocked to death and theres nothing you can really do.The only reason it has been tolerated up til now is because pvp never really mattered. At worst you might lose a few minutes and some souls to a runback, or maybe it takes a while to farm up a covenant reward (which are never anything important). It was worth putting up with because its generally fun to swing your swords at each other and it didnt really matter if you win or lose. If you put the broken pvp front and center as the lynchpin of whether you get rewarded at all, everyones going to hate it and its going to be a rude wake up call for fromsoft.
>>736575618This. Didn't buy Nightreign, won't buy this.Make a real game again, FromSoft. Playing with other people is cancer.
>battle royale>pvp extraction Why is FROM chasing cringe westoid trends?
>>736575618And why it locked to the shittiest console with the playerbase that hates challenge and anything beyond shit suitable for toddlers? This is like putting House of Velez on V.Smile. Nintendo man children already hate blood, they hate adversity, and they hate games made for adults. Why not just make it PC/Xbox/PS?
>>736582294It's pretty obvious Nintendo is desperate for exclusives that aren't copy and pasted baby IPs like Mario and Donkey Kong. FROM was paid a very large amount to throw Nintendo a bone.
