It's going to be different from the original and that's ok.
>>736575985Can't wait, I haven't been able to play this game in decades.
>right handed linksloppers gonna slop
this will be link graphics in 2016
>>736576275Are you aware of emulators? You could play that shit on your phone or buy an emulation console.
>>736576293
>>736575985>It's him
>>736575985Honestly doesnt need a remake, but since in the age of remakes we are gonna get one anyway, i hope it leans more onto the child/adult mechanic. Its unfortunate original only used it for the spirit temple.
>>736576350Yeah, the problem is I replayed the game so much when it came out that I burnt myself out of the game forever. I didn't own many games and it was so good I turned it into shit in no time lol.
>>736576360>You have to be 25+ to play the remakeThank God, gives Zelda larpers the time to go back and play other Zelda games to refine their tastes.
>>736576410This is why I don't like the "it doesn't need a remake" argument. You get tired of playing the same game a dozen times, you want another take on it. Usually because the franchise fails to deliver another game as good as that one years later. Like RE4. The best RE game since RE4 was RE4 remake to me.
>>736576484Preach, I also played through Wind Waker and Majora's Mask a few times but they're not the same. I love TP, and I force myself not to replay it for nearly a decade at a time.
>>736575985It's going to be a port of the 3DS version with almost no changes for 70 dollars, mark my fucking words
>>736575985There's nothing more pointless than a remake which isn't different from the original.
It will be a remake using the 3ds game as a base with new higher fidelity models. I doubt they will build something from the ground up. Nintendos too cheap for that but maybe I’m wrong.
>>736576293He'll be right handed in the remake
>>736575985Focus, L
>>736575985GOOD MORNING SAAR!
>>736577204>>736577383cope
>>736575985It's Monolith Soft doing it, isn't it? They revealed more of the people that worked on Zelda titles and their roles, and removed the recruitment ad for a Zelda project (which was there since 2019).https://x.com/MONOLITHSOFT/status/2040963946690289882So instead of a Grezzo upscale, it's a whole new take on a Zelda done by someone outside of Nintendo's primary development team.
>>736577204That's an irrational prediction. Nintendo is retarded in a lot of ways but they know Ocarina of Time is iconic. Why the hell would they make entirely new assets for random games like Mario RPG and Thousand Year Door and not Ocarina of Time?
A full-on OoT Remake being slated for this holiday could explain Nintendo's stingy news cycle recently. That'd be a hell of a giganuke to drop, and could hamper attention for Tomodachi and especially Yoshi if it got announced before they came out.>Be sure not to miss out on THIS eggs-elent adventure, when Yoshi and the Mysteriou->OOT REMAKE DIRECT WHEN>You'll be having the time of your Tomodachi Life, when Living the Dream comes out next wee->BRUH NOBODY GAF ABOUT THIS WII SPORTS POKOPIA BS AFTER YOU JUST SHOWED ZELDA (4 skull emojis)
>>736579195What's up with companies outsourcing remakes of their most iconic games to a random developer? It started off like this with the FF7 remake and the RE4 remake, until they had the sense to make it in house. In this case, it seems they stuck with Monolith Soft since the game is supposed to release this year, but it's a little different because they're pretty much Nintendo now, and there's probably a lot of key developers involved.
None of the Nintendo remakes were too different from the original, so I doubt
>>736579195>>736579847Weak bait.Monolith developed both BotW and TotK.
what do you think nintendo's favorite nirvana song is? i would guess Milk It
>>736579907no wonder it's soulless and lacks the feeling of a Zelda game.
It's gonna be a wasted opportunity being stuck on shit hardware.
>>736579916I think it's Happyface because I see them more as a Toadies company no this wasn't meant to be a pun about Toad
>>736579793>A full-on OoT Remake being slated for this holidayBetter not be Switch 2 exclusive
>>736575985My expectations are set on it just being a remaster of the 3DS version. Anything else is a pleasant surprise.
>>736579847>Monolith Soft>random developer
>>736580048Based
>Mario gets HD texture packs for SMG/2 for its anniversary and movie tie-in>Zelda gets a full-blown remake for its anniversary and movie tie-inZeldachads win again
>>736579907They assisted with asset creation. Not the core design of BotW/TotK.Just in December they had an interview where the Nintendo guy said in the coy manner "wouldn't it be cool if Monolith did a Zelda from the start?". That was basically their way of hinting that it was already in the works.Stick your head in the sand, when I'm right I'll be posting snapshots of every doubter. I am that petty.
>>736580404https://www.monolithsoft.co.jp/recruit/https://www.monolithsoft.co.jp/interview/dev01/index.htmlThere's a reason why Monolith is suddenly advertising how much of a role they've had in Zelda games. And posting interviews with various devs on what their roles were.They're working on a new Zelda, and a big selling point will it'll be more led by Monolith than Nintendo.
>>736579948>no wonder it's soullessAccording to who?
>>736580404>Not the core design of BotW/TotK.>literally says they helped with level design and gameplay
>>736580663People who played Zelda games before 2017.
>>736580575>All the worst Zelda gamesHahaha it's over, the remake will be shit
>>736580575hahaha thanks I have negative expectations now
>>736580835>Aonuma not involved or barely involved beyond dungeon designProbably decent>Aonuma moderately involvedTemper your expectations>Aonuma heavily involvedJust download Ship or Redux>Fujibayashi involved tooABANDON SHIP, NOT JUST FOR THIS REMAKE BUT FOR THE ENTIRE FUCKING FRANCHISE
>>736575985Considering how well BOTW and TOTK sold I have no hope they won't ruin this for stamina zoomers somehow.
>>736577204Wind Waker remake disproves this by itself
>>736580753You're being disingenuous on purpose.
>>736575985>game full of strong girls/women>game praising masculinity at every turnyeah, this is gonna be a disaster with modern nintendo.
>>736580402It better look like this graphically.
>>736581463I really hope Monolith, if they're behind this, bring in Yusuke Nakano for the official art again and to help with the design direction of models.
>>7365764844 REmake was awesome but I think I like 2 REmake best.
I'd like to see some more enemy variety. Not that OoT was too sorely lacking in that area, but there's definitely potential to do more, especially if it's a full-on remake.>please actually populate Hyrule Field with a meaningful and diverse enemy presence, including sticking them into grottos (make those unique too, but that's a different issue, though I'll say that I liked the general direction the hack Sealed Palace took them in)>give enemies that were originally similar to others more unique functionality (make Gibdos move fast like they used to in 2D games, give Dinolfos their fire breath from Majora's Mask, have the reviving Stalfos wear different colors and let their remains be killable with Bombs before they resurrect like in LttP, etc)>have more "level 2/3" variants of enemies in later areas, including maybe exclusive new levels in Master Quest if that concept is brought back>bring back some more classic enemies (Lynels, Wizzrobes [no not their goofy designs or moves from Majora's Mask], Zols/Gels, land Octoroks, etc)
>>736576374give credit to the AI upscaler for being more faithful to the intent than the contract hire jeetcoders who make the HD remasters
There is no OoT remake.
>>736583918There is no war in Ba Sing Se.
>>736583769>I liked the general direction the hack Sealed Palace took them inThose grottos were pretty fun. Some actual platforming challenges to be rewarded with a Heart Piece at the end.
>>736575985>remake of a remakeboring, so fucking boring
>>736584057And they weren't a replacement for dungeons nor strewn everywhere, so they added some nice variety to the quest.
>>736576410I felt this happening with Civ V, had to stop playing it for like 5 years to be able to like it again.
>>736583769I don't care that it'd be shameless Smash/Spaceworld 2000 fanservice. Give me a swordfighting phase in the Ganondorf battle.
>>736584125OoT never got a remake, only a remaster.
>>736581202Pointing your retardation isn't what disingenuous means.
I'd welcome something more interesting than just "realistic style", honestly I'm hoping for something like thishttps://youtu.be/kb9Y5VXuqxg
>>736584531That would be great.
>>736585027I actually think it'd be a really cool moment if the room was set up as a callback to SW2000. Not necessarily an exact recreation, but have a big (probably breakable) banquet table as part of the scene, and I think other oldfags would genuinely lose their fucking minds.
>>736580781Most pre-2017 Zelda fans like BOTW/TOTK too.
>>736584710Is this a predictive programming psyop?
>>736577204>>736579630They'll turn OoT into a trilogy of full priced games that sell worse as it releases.
>>736575985what if it's just a legend of zelda movie tie-in game?
>>736585306rent free
>>736585306Are you Peter Jackson?
>>736584125why did you click on the thread then? clearly it interests you on some level.
There is no OoT remake you schizos
>>736586067>hear for years about a FE4 remake being around the corner>finally fucking ends after 3h part 2 is announced>now I'll have to hear about an OoT remake that is "right around the corner" for years.is there any evidence that suggests OoT is specifically getting a remake?
>>736580119nigga what else would it be on, 3ds?
>>736586639Don't forget the FF9 remake they were swearing up and down was the very next announcement for like the past 6 years
>>736580404>from scratchSo not a remake
>>736586639>is there any evidenceNo, tendies just start hallucinating when they go too long without news.
>>736583970Technically true
>>736586639It's just a rumor from a Twitterfag that retards are running with acting like its reality.
>>736584710he made link look like a faggot
>>736586717Switch 1. Are you a retard?
>>736588663dead console
>>736586639>is there any evidence that suggests OoT is specifically getting a remake?A leaker with a proven track record said it's coming out holiday 2026.>>736587002FF9 remake is a thing. It was in the nvidia leak.
>>736588683https://nintendowire.com/news/2026/02/03/switch-1-sales-top-155-million-making-it-nintendos-best-selling-console-ever/
>>736575985it's only worthwhile if it's a FF7R style remake, who cares about another OoT 3DS style port
>>736579847Because publishers exist to strip the reputation from the creators and will at most slap the label of "creator" on one or two easily controlled people, usually whatever narcissistic janitor cleans up best in front of a camera.The "original company" no longer exists and no longer possesses the talent that made the game, so it effectively doesn't matter if the remake is passed to more efficient mobile shovelware devs.>>736580404There was no "core design of BotW/TotK", the fact that they worked on asset creation means that they contributed most of the filler required to create something that was actually a functional game.>>736583907>Give credit to something that is mostly just using dataset noise to fill gaps and hallucinating pattern completionsNo.>>736584580>RemasterUnless they record new analog/digital master data from analog samples there are no more remasters in any way that is relevant, everything else is either a remake or a straight port.
>>736579948That I agree>>736581150That port with worse lightning?>>736581202And that anon is right
