[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1776016777931080.png (1.66 MB, 1166x912)
1.66 MB
1.66 MB PNG
there is any hope for a new Generals or at least a remake in current year?
>>
Maybe
>>
Perhaps
>>
>>736871124
No cause the RTS meta is making games where you have to zoom out so far you just see icons moving over the map so its almost pointless to see the cool units fight.
>>
>>736871124
Never EA isn't interested in making anything command and conquer related.
>>
>>736873423
Then zoom in
>>
Why remake? Just make a sequel don't be a lazy cunt
>>
>>736871124
Technically the source code of Generals and Zero Hours has been released, so it only needs some people of good hearts that decide to add new techs, new 4k graphics, write down a story etc. For the rest, the community can do it by their own, as EA is simply ignoring the situation
>>
>>736871124
And I repeat (again) there's no reason why Petroglyph didn't asked EA to sell them the C&C franchise, as they're the original devs of the series.
>>
>>736874583
Just like how Blizzard ignored the turtle situation?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.