I mean yeah he’s right. At the time It was extremely common for a nobleman to have a sexual (but usually not romantic) relationship with his page. Generally when the page was underaged but it often did continue into the age of majority. That’s not woke it’s just historical accuracy.
if something could be removed without making the game historically inaccurate then the only reason to include it is because you wanted it specifically. ergo, KCD 2 devs explicitly chose to add the african kang and poopy buttsex. ergo, it's pozzed.
If i fuck an extremely girly tranny it doesn't make me gay. Same thing.
>jew says jewish thing at a jewish award show for jews to pat other jews on the backdont care sage
>>737197210That's complete bs, you clown. Pages for knights were the children of nobles, as pages were on track to knighthood. What you refer to is rape and this was disliked, albeit little a peasant could do about it. Think of the Russian military. Rape isn't encouraged, but happens daily.
You are right, being gay was normal back then. If anything being straight is the historical aberration.
>>737198336>If i fuck [a man] it doesn't make me gaySure. You fucked the man because you were already gay.
>we have gay shit>we have magic negro>we have jewish bullshit>but we are not woke
