I'm stuck
you have to start doing hypotheticals bro, like presume a block is in one spot and keep solving, and if you run into an impossiblility then you know the hypothetical block cannot be. its basically boring trial and error which is why i don't play nonograms
The second column with just 2 1 you can X out right below the X on the 5 1 1 row. Since it's 2 1 it can't be there because if it's a 2 where it's filled in then it will be Xed out anyways and if it's a 1 where it's filled in then the 2 can't be there because there's no room. The rest of the puzzle should be solvable.
>>737225246Usually you can cross reference with 100% certainty but unless I'm missing something this is one of those where you just have to guess it and retrace your steps if it doesn't work outI don't like those ones
>>737225361Yep that's what I needed good work anon
>>737225092On vert 2/1, the marked square cant have one in it two above. Can break it open from there
>>737225092The bottom row with the 4, the 4 can’t start from the leftmost column because then the 2 above wouldn’t fit, cross out that spot and go from there.
>>737225712But what if the bottom 4 is the 1
Thanks for the help anons I had to guess again but it worked outThat was an annoying one for sure
>>737225092heregreen line = must be here from existing infored line = cant be here from existing info
>>737225246If the puzzle requires this then it's a failure of a logic puzzle
>>737226418
>>737228802Nonograms and sudoku and their ilk are nothing but following a set of rules that let you solve them. It's on par with doing a grade schooler's math homework.
>>737228802trvke
>>737228969that's what logic puzzles are, yes
oh ok, not too hard. didn't need to guess at all, don't know what those anons are talking about
>>737227236Then how do you explain the 2 in column 6
>>737225398I completed it myself for fun, you don't need to do any guesses here. Just work piecewise
