[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1701006919634.jpg (16 KB, 249x239)
16 KB JPG
Tell me why p2w games are bad without sounding like a poorfag
>>
>reddit frog
go back
>>
>>737227030
why play the game? just compare bank accounts
>>
>>737227030
Yeah, just create a tactical nuke weapon to automatically win the game. I think there was a game that actually did that, but I don't remember which one... I guess it was battlefront or something.
>>
>>737227030
p2w games needs fodders for the whales to dunk on, and they will leave if the game is too p2w
>>
Solving your problems with money isn't fun. It is efficient, but it isn't fun.
>>
>>737227030
I'm not "like a" poorfag, I AM a poorfag, and I'm not ashamed of it.
>>
>>737228291
shitting on poors if fun though
>>
Because they're almost always designed with 0 gameplay and a fuck ton of padding. You should be able to beat a game at your own pace but the majority of ptw games soft lock you out of progress for an indeterminate amount of time just to entice you to pay so you don't have to wait any more.
>>
File: 1757495587152.png (908 KB, 827x651)
908 KB PNG
p2w games are just to scammy now
2009-11 DO was peak p2w, you could get any premium gear just by playing and once you did, there was no difference between paypigs and f2p players



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.