https://aftermath.site/gamers-sue-nintendo-tariffs/Will they win the case /v/?
honestly, based. give me my $5 back for the procon 2 you fucks.
>>737432438Get fucked
>>737432383>it's-a coming on, it's-a coming, it's-a dere
I bet nintendeen is behind this
>>737432383Don't mess with gamers!
>>737432383Do they even have a case here
I should be able to sue them for shit games
>>737432929Troon daughter
>>737432929I miss the era of nerds being like this they were unironically a lot better and funnier to be around. Gamers, mall ninjas, cars shop fags, ghost hunters, etc.
>>737433143no, lmao
>>737433979Holy unemployed. You look like this to anyone with a job you cringeworthy loser.
>>737433143Lmao no, if they did though then every other single company that also got caught by the tariffswould be open to this too and they would weasel their way out anyway.>>737433495We are talking about Nintendo here, not Playstation.No but seriously, Playstation has shut down so many games this gen that it just isn't funny anymore.
>>737434240Seethe tendie
>>737433909Dang, Buckley can't even have that over Penny Arcade anymore
>>737432383>Looking at who started this lawsuit>my face whenNot only is this shit stupid, but this lawsuit is made by people who don't even buy nor play Nintendo games SO what was even the point of this lawsuit?
>>737436386To get free money and stick it to tendies
He won
>>737436658What a noble act.
>>737436738the cuck chair.
>>737436806Which Nintendo will be in after they lose
Snoys need to be killed, holy shit.
>Suing Nintendo for not passing the tariff refunds back to consumersNintendo can just argue they did exactly that by not raising the Switch 2 prices like Sony did with the PS5.Hell, it says right there in the article, pre-orders went up before the tariffs and were not impacted.
>>737433979You can blame trannies and their handlers for ruining it all
>>737436738The getting raped contest
>>737437371Nintendo shifted the tariffs to accessories instead, anyone that bought an accessory for the Switch 2 was impacted. The Switch 1 itself also got a tariff price hike, but I'm not who the fuck was buying one instead of a Switch 2.
>>737432383>Suing Nintendo for not passing the tariff refunds back to consumers Let's be honest: none of the affected companies are going to do this.
>>737437535>Nintendo shifted the tariffs to accessories insteadI know, but it doesn't matter, they can still argue they ate losses from keeping the Switch 2's price.The plaintiffs are basing their case on the tariffs having 0 impact on Nintendo's bottom line. How can they possibly prove that? Just because the Switch 2's launch was a financial success doesn't mean they didn't potentially lose money from the tariffs.
>>737437535>but I'm not who the fuck was buying one instead of a Switch 2This was also happening when Switch 1 refurbished models were at their cheapest, so it's on the buyer at that point. But this is a snoy seethe thread, what's there to expect?
>>737437850Look at it this way:>Nintendo raises the prices of items to offset tariffs>Government potentially refunds Nintendo for the tariffs>Nintendo now made extra money and the consumers don't get refunded their share of the tariffs they had to payConsumers that bought a Pro Controller 2 or another set of Joycon 2s WERE impacted by this, even the NSO controllers went up in price. Basically "if Nintendo didn't actually pay tariffs, why do I have to?", the tariff refunds are a can of worms because there will probably be similar lawsuits like this for other companies too.
>>737438160>Nintendo raises the prices of items to offset tariffsBut that's the problem, we don't know if raising accessory prices offset the tariffs or just softened the blow, because they didn't raise prices across the board and they didn't touch their current big ticket item.The plaintiffs are saying Nintendo already recouped the costs and tariff refunds are a trick for more profit. How could they know that? How can they possibly prove it in court?
>>737437115Seethe tendie
>>737438538It doesn't really matter, the argument is that consumers should get a partial return as well otherwise this was a transfer of wealth from consumers to corporations (across the board, not just with Nintendo). It's likely those prices never come down as well and Joycons will remain $100 and Pro Controllers will remain $90 going forward.>How can they possibly prove it in court?If Nintendo is forced to hand over financial reports, the numbers would speak for themselves but until those numbers come out there's no way for us to know one way or another. The sentiment of corporations getting bailed out while consumers don't is completely right though, whether or not courts will side on behalf of the people is another story and I'd assume corporate lobbies will win.
>>737439129>It doesn't really matterIt does matter, because their argument hinges on the idea that raising accessory prices made the tariffs a zero sum loss. They cannot prove that.Ironically, the shitposts from a few months ago about how Nintendo's stock dropped because the Switch 2 wasn't as profitable as previous consoles just give Nintendo more justification.
>>737432383NOOO LEAVE MY BILLION COMPANY ALONE!JFC Nintendo fags have out fagged Apple fags in the last 10 years when it comes to company cock sucking. Pretty pathetic desu especially since both companies treat their customers like shit but they don't care and keeps buying their shit.
>>737432383>two retards suing nintendo because of "tariff pricing"They're going to get raped
>>737441181...Are you retarded or something?People who are actually thinking realise it's a lot more complicated because the tariffs were in fact illegal and it absolutely muddies the water.
>>737437518Deen owns you. Sony owns you
>>737446202Your wife owns full custody of the kids, deen.
