>>737482087
Price?

>>737482087
How big are the servers?
Does it have tanks?
Does it have jets?

>>737482750
40v40. No player controlled jets. Yes tanks

>>737482591
iirc $30, regional

>>737482087
>Can't preorder
>No price given
>No idea about server browser/general functionality at launch
>3 maps only
I mean I have been waiting for this since 2019, but it's like they purposefully want to kill the game.
>>737482750
Tanks are shown in gameplay. T63-B for soviets I know is one of them. Actually looked pretty decent, though they have will take like 5+ RPG shots to destroy which might fuck up the balance.
>Jets
No. Although helicopters as important as they where for theme in rising storm, fucking sucked most of the time. They looked cool through. I don't think we will ever see worthwhile functional jets again in anything but a pure military autism simulator. Still we are getting white phosphorus artillery strikes which i am excited for since the napalm strikes in rising storm Vietnam where perfect.

>>737484243
>>3 maps only
Seriously?

>>737484436
Yes and 2 game modes. Which is fine since I only ever played territories 95% of the time and the campaign mode in rising storm Vietnam to get the different "endings" that changed history. Since this game is entirely fictional they won't even have that.

>>737484672
This shit is going to be DOA

>>737482087
It was unbelievably bad
No way they can accumulate enought people even for a few servers

>>737484243
Battlefield had jets

>>737482087
RS2 was my favorite multiplayer game of all time but I have heard literally nothing about this other than the reveal trailer years ago and didn't even know it was releasing soon

>>737485727
I hope not since battlefield 6 was absolute ass and there is currently nothing in the less casual then call of duty but not as autistic as hell let loose/arma category of military large scale squad shooters.

>>737485882
I said we would never see them again, not that they never existed, saar.

>>737485907
We need somthing like battlefield combined with foxhole or planetside 2z or any other persistent war game.

>>737482087
What hype?

Kinda surprised to see this game released. I thought it was going to be vaporware.

The 2nd beta was ok

>>737485894
it's no longer the same dev and plays completely different to RS2. Cheap asset flip. They had an open beta and it sucked.

>>737484243
>though they have will take like 5+ RPG shots to destroy
oh cool its the Squad tranny devs then
>full simulation autism for infantry
>but arcade mode for vehicles because I like to get easy kills haha chaingun go brrrrrrt :)
>also we will delist your server permanently if you don't ban instantly anyone being sexist or transphobe :3

>>737487095
Why are you bringing up squad? That game is shit.

>>737486734
They changed it since the open beta

File: Insurgency 02.21.2017 - 2(...).webm (3.03 MB, 1920x1080)

3.03 MB WEBM

Answer me this: How lethal are the guns. 1 shot (body, center mass) = 1 kill?

>>737487858
pretty much yeah

>>737487875
>pretty much yeah
With 5.56?

>>737487961
I don't remember, I always double tapped.

>>737487858
>Insurgency
They pulled a fast one with the sequel and kept changing the game modes every 2 weeks until it became unbalanced and twitch shooter slop.

>>737482087
I played the beta and lost all interest
>but they fixed it
Well I was never in the beta with those fixes and I'm not paying for this game

I'm waiting for this shit to release and an hour ago it said it would be out in less then an hour.

Out now

>>737490565
lol no one cares. Game is DOA.

>>737482087
Huh, shouldn't I have gotten an email about it

I'll take the risk and grab it but only because it's cheap
Wait are there Australian servers? my internet has been even worse than usual lately, or at least some good singapore servers (I am roughly equal between the east coast and singapore

>>737482087
I'm gonna wait for the steam reviews

roadmap just released
https://steamcommunity.com/games/1059220/announcements/detail/492723157169341085?snr=2___

>>737491246
they launched without progression, cosmetic customization, and a tutorial? lol

>>737491861
Launching with no progression is fine, but what is giga cancer is launch with progression and then reseting everybodies progress when you overhaul progression like I had with starship troopers: extermination while killed my enthusiasm to play much more, weirdly though I had one friend who somehow kept his progress, nobody else I knew did

File: thumb-1920-1238752.jpg (167 KB, 1920x1080)

167 KB JPG

Why play '83 when I can play Reforger? Developers are pretty retarded

>>737491861
>Progression
Zoom zoom

>>737482087
The fact that the devs had to be told by the community to add boxed free aim to their Rising Storm successor doesn't bode well for the rest of the game.

>>737490920
ah there is is, I got it 27 minutes ago, just took a bit

How is it? The nextfest demo was one of the worst fps I've ever played. Is it improved at all?

>>737492204
Because Arma is nothing like rising storm which this game is a sequel too?

>>737492480
And they only added it as an op-in option, you can still play without it which just gives people who wanted it a disadvantage anyway.

>>737482750
It has tanks and jeeps. No helicopters or jets. It's 40v40 (probably because UE5 can't handle anything more than that, and is already a technical mess as it is).

>>737491861
>expanded battle chatter
They didn't complete recording the voices
>commander ability
>new vehicle class
Didn't even implement core game mechanics that the map design should revolve around. 40v40 is also too small to have mutiple apc on top of jeeps and tanks imo
Also
>basic server management in community request
>bipod jank that never get fixed in past games
>no dolphin dive

>>737492204
Different scale/subgenre. Reforger copied Squad and has logi busy work and brushwrecking issue. This is supposed to be ro/rs successor with focused on refined gunplay and movement. Except they have no money, talent or original idea to save them from being DOA

>>737492567
I never used this shit in rising storm desu. It's no wonder they only added it in to please autists.

>>737492834
>Dolphin dive
Please tell me this is bait

>>737482087
What killed it for me was that bullshit limited time to play.
Can't think of a dumber approach, maybe a paid access.

>>737491246
>early access
>$30
>only 3 maps
>only 3 more maps currently planned by "full release"
>UE5 slop
>all those missing basic features
>currently only 400 people playing

Jesus Christ. Show this to the retards crying about Marathon still to explain what an actual flop looks like. This game and the devs are so cooked.

File: ironlily.jpg (451 KB, 1272x1234)

451 KB JPG

never got to try the beta
looking for some gameplay videos first

>>737484243
>>Can't preorder
Are you Indian?

>>737493164
The game has no price displayed, which is available on games you can preorder. Until it releases an hour ago there was no way to tell. Are you a dev trying to shill? The game is looking DOA.

>>737493074
>400 people playing
It's been out for one hour. Give it till the weekend.

>>737482087
Absolutely. It was genuinely awful. No way I'm spending a cent on this until they prove to me that they actually made it good and fixed/changed everything. Frankly though, I think the devs and game will be shut down in a few weeks. This early access launch is a move of sheer desperation because they need money. It's not ready and it isn't going to sell well enough to keep their doors open or finish this abortion.

>>737482087
Does this game have levelling to get to the commander, like on rising storm Vietnam? If it has no level 30 commander unlock at EA, it's fucking worthless, because you need experienced players only in that role.

>>737493504
>Looks awful
Really. I'm looking at a stream of the gameplay and it looks great.

>>737493327
Games that aren't botting their playercounts like Crimtroon Desert always peak between noon and 5 PM central on launch day. Whatever this ends this afternoon at is where it stays.

>>737493519
Progression system and commander abilities are roadmap items coming later kek

'83 what an awful name
Dev's first day on the internet

>>737493617
>Crimson Desert
You mean the game that sold 5 million copies and is singleplayer only. Are you a fucking retard?

>>737493660
Are you saying there is no control over artillery strikes on launch? That is like half the game!

>>737493696
It was the name they chose 7 years ago after they made Rising Storm Vietnam.

>>737493757
The people making this game do not understand RO2/RS2 and failed utterly at making a successor to them. It's not the same people or company and it shows.

>>737493878
It's the same people who made Rising Storm Vietnam.

>>737493930
No it isn't.

>>737493954
Blue Dot Games is an independent studio formed by key former members of Antimatter Games (developers of Rising Storm 2: Vietnam.)

>>737494101
>key former members

Clearly not considering how hard they botched this kek

Operation Flashpoint was released 25 years ago and has never been beaten. Even the arma sequels fail to capture OFP's magic.

The promo clips from years ago show British troops instead of American and are in UE4, after the Embracer fiasco it seems they just scrapped the whole thing and started anew in UE5 which is why it's such a mess and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the devs quit inbetween.

These unlisted videos show what the game looked like in 2019 and didn't really seem to have progressed much during the open beta 6 months ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9ESjQJ5Z3Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6upKFyKfO5c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeET5tBnwTI

how many weapons are in the game right now? i've only seen like the ak47, m16, m60, and mp5(?)

>>737493954
Retard

>>737494142
>Backpedalling and goalpost shifting

>>737494219
Animations got a full re-haul since the beta.

>>737494101
Thank you for proving him right. Different company entirely and only a couple of people involved at best (who probably already left years ago since this was in development hell for over half a decade)

>>737494397
>>737493954
Samefag and still factually wrong no matter how much goalpost moving you do.

>>737494219
UE5 absolutely killed this game, as it does all games that use it. What a shame. If they had stayed with UE4 it probably would have been good. It's in utter fucking shambles as of right now though.

oof yeah this game is going to die quickly. its hard enough being indie but you need a big launch to cushion away 90% of your players leaving. if it cant even crack 1k, then when 90% of players leave, theres not even going to be enough players to fill a single server.

>>737482087
Played it in alpha and beta testing.

Game was absolutely terrible every step of the way. Looks and feels like a crappy CoD clone from 2005. Yes that includes the most recent playtests.

>>737494523
Yeah. 11 AM already and it's barely above 800 players. It's so fucking over.

>>737494167
Funny, because the only Operation Flashpoints I liked were Dragon Rising and Red River on Xbox 360.

>>737494629
800 already is fine. It'll hit over 2k by the weekend since it's already doubled and most people are still wagecucking.

>>737494828
No it won't. Peak is always launch day. It has another 6 hours to hit that, and if it doesn't, it never will. Also, 2000 players is still laughably low. It's DOA.

File: file.png (824 KB, 1990x406)

824 KB PNG

What am I in for?

>>737494629
>>737494828
>already dropped back below 800 to 780

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>737494901
It's been out 90 minutes you retard.

>>737494828
>It'll hit over 2k
it needs to hit way more than that. especially with an EA release that has limited content most of those people will leave. 90% of 20k, still enough people left to play the game. 90% of 2k, GG.

>>737494968
Genuine disappointment, tons of crashes, and server problems.

>>737494990
It's at 796 anon.

>>737495005
>Muh 90% drop off
Source?

>>737494968
The only military shooter worth playing this decade

>>737495106
>Source?
Me. I am smarter than you.

>>737495005
I'm guessing the one guy coping ITT is a marketer. This shit is as stillborn as can be. These types of FPS only ever have a playerbase for about two weeks before dropping off massively forever like you say, and it can't even find a thousand players on launch day. Sad.

>>737494968
A refund in about 40 minutes I reckon

File: 1768094646401101.jpg (29 KB, 238x357)

29 KB JPG

>>737494684
>the only ofp games i liked were ofp only in name

>>737494828
It will likely hit around 2000 on the weekend and then drop like a fucking rock afterwards.

Anyone who says this game is good has absolutely atrocious taste and needs to stfu.

>>737494990
>>737495056
766 and still falling

Technically it's in a better state than Rising Storm 2 was for the first year

>>737496404
RS2 had around 20,000 people playing the first few days.

>>737482087
personally im gonna go ahead and wait for 88

>>737496679
I said technically. Some us actually play the game, instead of looking at SteamDB

>>737482087
The multiplayer shooter market is dire and in desperate need of a new RO2/RS2-like... but this game is not it. I was excited and hopeful for this game for a long time but it's just shit. It's depressing. But at least Gallipoli is out next month to scratch the itch I suppose.

>>737496404
No it isn't. RS2 was a great game even on day one. This shit is a fucking disaster and feels like ass to play. They are not comparable and your memory of that game is clearly warped.

>>737496753
I played it too. Game blows and nowhere even close to being as good as RS2.

>>737496814
>>737496820
RS2 was abomination on launch, with sound being all over the place, that it felt broken, they removed client sided hit detection and felt like an absolute downgrade when compared to RO2

File: 1774688474759665.jpg (33 KB, 580x435)

33 KB JPG

>>737496753
You're one of the devs, aren't you?

>>737496961
There's no way he isn't either a dev or a marketer with these kind of lies >>737496957

>>737496957
Your cope is as pathetic as this game.

>>737497090
RS2 did have worse hit detection than RO2 but comparing the netcode issues it suffered from at launch to '83 which doesn't even have commander abilities yet seems rather disingenuous.

File: 20170224094425_1.jpg (358 KB, 1920x1080)

358 KB JPG

>>737497090
I actually played RS2 pre-release. RS2 was so bad on launch I completely dropped it for a year, until they fixed it and added stuff. And I actually bought SSD specifically to load RS2 fast.
Instead I played Day of Infamy in the meantime.

why does it feel like we only get 2 speeds of multiplayer fps games?

File: 123124334534664.png (45 KB, 978x160)

45 KB PNG

Its not supposed to do that, right?

>>737497227
Wtf have they been doing since 2019 if they still don't have commander abilities implemented

the demo they did a while ago was so bad that I really don't want to touch this until it's out of early access, assuming they actually salvage it

>>737497656
There was a play session last month and it much more polished.

Right now the hate seems really forced. It's pretty barebones right now, but otherwise polished.

File: steam-early-access-warning.jpg (149 KB, 1200x630)

149 KB JPG

>>737497656
This. Same. But since it's a huge flop, I am now doubting that they'll ever finish it. Either they pull the plug in a few weeks, or it becomes one of those abandoned early access games with this disclaimer added by Steam eventually

>>737497491
Damn, how many Concords have we had this year already? 4? 5?

>>737482087
>the beta really kill all the hype?
Yes. Beta didn't even come close to that RO/RS feeling. It just felt wrong.

>>737497967
>"polished"
>UE5
>runs like shit
>graphics are way worse than RS2
>gunplay feels like shit
>3 maps
>tons of bugs
>server issues
>trash audio
>missing tons of basic features
>crashes constantly
>"""""polished"""""

lmao, you can't be fucking serious

>>737498717
Cord had a way bigger budget this is not a AAA game.

Klean is streaming it right now and this game looks mid. That WW1 game he was playing looked better and that game was ten times jankier.

>>737482087
im bored of coldwarslop

>>737499293
Nah, it's valid. This was in development for 7+ years and the devs are literally are out of money. It's a failed multiplayer FPS. This is officially part of the Concordian Timeline now.

>>737499130
The base player controller and core gameplay are fine. 83 feels like a functional game, even if barebones. I couldn't say the same about RS2 on launch.

I have yet to experience any crashes or any game breaking bugs.
Performance could be better, but it works on my PC™ with 9070XT.

Played it for 2 hours and its all right. 3 maps can get old fast though. It runs pretty well for me too but i don't have a potato pc so yeah.

>>737499543
>I couldn't say the same about RS2 on launch.

Because you weren't there, didn't play it, and are lying out of your ass.

>>737499605
I literally played it pre-release, I used to post the pre-release info here.

>>737499712
See
>>737499605

File: 20170224122351_1.jpg (485 KB, 1920x1080)

485 KB JPG

>>737499863
Get fucked

I got banned from the Discord for asking how many jeets there were among the developers.

is there MP campaign?

>people say there are no commander abilities
>people use them just fine

do people even play games here?

>>737500375
Their own road map literally says "commander abilities" as one of the things they plan to add in coming months. Blame the devs.

>>737500332
No

File: slave_miner.jpg (31 KB, 360x288)

31 KB JPG

>>737500375
>do people even play games here?

Welcome to the /v/.

>>737500332
There's not enough content for it yet, but the maps actually have separate objectives depending on whether NATO or Warsaw Pact is the attacking side, so clearly it's planned

>lunch break
>already dropped to 450 players


Holy shit, there's no coming back from this

>>737501206
>>737501001
>7 years in development
>no mp campaign
lmao

>>737501341
did you skip the part where they had to halt the development to focus on IGI?

>>737501341
There's only 3 maps. With only 3 more planned to release in the next year of early access. It's obvious they did fuck all during those 7 years and probably restarted development a few times. I can safely say switching to UE5 from 4 was the worst mistake they ever could have made.

>>737501440
the hell's igi

>>737501440
dont care. theyre charging 27 bucks for a game with 3 maps and nothing else.

>>737501440
Apparently you missed the part where this is not the same developer at all. IGI is Anti-matter and Tripwire (the actual people who made RO2 and RS2), this is some nobody studio made by a couple of people who quit Anti-matter and took this idea with them. Not the same devs, not even the same company/publisher.

File: file.png (240 KB, 382x427)

240 KB PNG

Yikes! I loved rising storm but this game doesn't seem like its anywhere near ready. $30 for an early access game where you basically have to hope the server has enough people in it is not a good look. I'll just stick to buttfield6 for now and wait to see if this game slingshots around.

>>737501494
6 maps on planned launch is on par with RS2 and KF1.

The longevity of 83 will depend on whether they release the tools to make the maps. That's why RO2 and RS2 got so much post-release content, they just paid the modders. Rising Storm was going to be a mod to begin with.

>>737501714
It essentially is. One of Antimatter founders acquired everything '83 related and tried to hire as many of former AMG as possible.

I'm investing all in on '83 coins. You guys are gonna be super jealous once this game pops off!

>>737501943
It's really not. Again, at no point was this ever being developed by Anti-matter or Tripwire. It has no affiliation. Some people who worked on it used to work there and that's all (allegedly, for all we know they could have quit years ago since it's spent nearly a decade in development hell).

>>737501726
Breaks my heart, but I'm doing the same. 500 players on day ond indicates the servers will be a ghost town in a week though. I hope they can turn this around and make a good game, but I'm certainly not giving them the benefit of the doubt today.

>>737499512
That's not what a "concord" game is

>>737501726
What could they even realistically pull off to push it up to even 1/2 of RS2's playerbase from this low of a starting point?

>>737502586
Yes it is. A failed multiplayer shooter in 2026 that is spectularly flopping after 7+ years of stalled development is the definition of a Concord-like.

>>737502680
Lower the price by half, fix the gunplay, make it actually feel like RS2, and add some more maps. Bare minimum to even be worth giving another chance. UE5 alone is standing in the way of it being decent though.

Realistically this game and the developer are shutting down within the next month, it's flopping way too hard for it to end any differently. They haven't said it, but the unsubtle vibe from the devs is that they are basically out of money.

File: file.png (77 KB, 985x658)

77 KB PNG

Player chart for first 90 days.
Both of these games released on a Tuesday.

>>737503078
Even with how rough this game is now, if it had around 10,000-20,000 people playing I probably would have kept it instead of refunding. These games are always at their most fun in their first few weeks when the playerbase is large and full servers are easy to find, and cheaters/hacked community servers don't exist. But 500 people? It's so dead it hurts. That's only about 6 full servers for reference.

sorry but im waiting for Black Orchestra
it recently even got a Steam page

It's dead because it took so long to release that the target audience aged out of games and got replaced by gacha brownoids

>>737499512
NO, Concored dev team spent more money on toilet paper then this games budged.

The only game that still has player is Hell Let Loose

this genre of games died a really sad and pathetic death,such a shame

>>737495193
t.indian

>>737503889
Because it's the only good one anymore. RS2 is overrun with hackers. Squad is trash and got run into the ground hard after the devs sold out to a Chinese company. Hell Let Loose Vietnam is coming out soon (this summer I think) and will continue to mop up.

>>737495408
You haven't played it though>>737496753
This
>>737496957
And this

>>737497276
Based day of infamy bro. The graphics where absolute shit and the gunplay was sourced garbage but damn did they try with the shitty bones they had.

I feel almost entirely done with these big milsim games. Feel like I've played them all and they can't really offer me much.
When someone makes a strong effort to bring back a planetside-style MMOFPS call me up for that

>>737499512
Concord cost 375 million dollars to make.

Better than I expected, but I couldn't find a populated server for the Frontline game mode, which sucks. It feels a bit undercooked and basic, while somewhat serviceable. Player count quite low and dropping also. I'm going to refund for now and keep an eye on it.

>>737501726
>Battlefield 6
Just play modern warfare 3 remastered. The maps are about the same fucking size and the graphics are better.

>>737501825
>Community maps
Yeah like the garbage in kf1 and rising storm no thanks.

>>737503718
>>737504126
Missing the point. See
>>737502806

>>737504083
Planetside 2 sucked balls in terms of gunplay.

>>737504324
Nope. Not comparable, understand economics commie. MAGA.

>>737504216
runs better too

>>737504564
so did planetside 1, don't matta, they're interesting games with ideas that are barely explored by shooters, planetside 1 especially

"good gunplay" is overrrated do interesting mechanics you can only get so far with fodder for youtube gun animation compilations

>>737497656
Same here. UE5 really is a curse.

File: 1776423730135102.png (747 KB, 746x850)

747 KB PNG

>526 In-Game
DOA it's done

>>737503991
I thought the HLL vietnam video was awful everything was fuckin orange.

>>737504785
I agree with you. But I also don't think the gunplay in them is bad. The other fag is just the lone coping shill for this failure sent here as humiliation ritual by his employer.

>>737504852
Yep. Only a matter of weeks now before they pull the plug I expect.

File: 1754195714311430.gif (1020 KB, 560x560)

1020 KB GIF

Why did i not buy this game?

>>737482087
>>737497491
I don't know what the budget for this game is or was, but just doing some quick math and assuming 600 people own the game and didn't refund and subtracting Steam's 30% cut, they devs have only made ~$11,340 today.

I don't think that's gonna be enough lol

>>737505661
>I don't know what the budget for this game is or was, but just doing some quick math and assuming 600 people own the game and didn't refund and subtracting Steam's 30% cut, they devs have only made ~$11,340 today.
>CCU = all time players
Game flopped hard but youre the biggest retard itt.

>>737505794
The game peaked just above 800 players just before sharply dropping down to 600 a couple of hours ago, and has remained below that ever since. These are the only numbers to work witn and it seems pretty clear that the total ownership is not much higher than the assumed 600 (despite the current players being 530). I'm being generous here. Obviously there could be a couple hundred more owners than what I used to find out that total, but they definitely have not sold more than 1000 copies with the playercount as it is I can promise you that. Regardless, they've made at best maybe $15-$20k on a game that certainly would have cost hundreds of thousands more than that to make.

File: 12598978.gif (1.38 MB, 200x200)

1.38 MB GIF

If it took 7 years to develop this, imagine how many years we'll have to wait for it to be finished.

I miss RS1 so much.

>>737506071
i want my flamethrower

>>737506031
Assuming they don't just abandon it in a month, they claim the 1.0 will be in about a year. I highly doubt it makes it there with how hard it has bombed though.

>>737504852
boomer concord

>>737506147
One of the best conversations I witnessed was in RS2:
>How is this balanced?
>It's a flamethrower, it's not supposed to be balanced

>>737504918
Now go ass to mouth.

>>737506006
4 hours sales data is indeed all there is to go on so you must be correct by your own standards. Do the math again in the future I'm sure it will come out exactly the same. Maybe trump will get a third term too.

>>737482087
>early access
>launches
ok retard

>>737504216
i like the class system and objective modes in battlefield more. i haven't played a cod since blops 1.

>>737482087
The problem with these type of games is basically that Hell Let Loose exists.
And therefore they will always be compared to it, and crumble horribly in comparison.

Speaking of, I just got invite to HLL Vietnam, high hopes for that one to be "the" Vietnam game from now on. RS2 was alright but way too limited still.

File: 1765263100457081.jpg (42 KB, 650x366)

42 KB JPG

>>737508008
Forgot pic

>>737508008
is HLL mindless fun though...?

>>737508008
That and ARMA Reforger both mog this.

>>737508008
HLL and those Squad-lite games suck because they have these shitty logi parts that drag the game down. No I dont want to go in the cuck truck and drop off boxes while everyone else gets to have fun and play the game. No I dont want to flank 100 miles and not see a firefight for 10 minutes, and if I do get into a fight, it will be like against 4 people because the maps too fucking big. I want to spawn in, run for 20 seconds at most and have to fight a heavily fortified position that i cant simply walk 10 minutes around, I and my team NEED to kill the 30 people holed up in the objective through well timed pushes and call-ins.

there are still full RS2 servers every day, and people keep saying RS2 is dead.

What about bellum?

>>737508694
COD and Battlefield 6 are what you're looking for then

if you dont want to play literal trash like COD or BF what is even left?

HLL, maybe Squad or Insurgency 2? I tried ARMA Reforger and the larping faggots make my blood boil.

>>737508008
how did oyu get an invite for HLL Vietnam? is it a preorder thing or something?

>>737508780
Except Red Orchestra was the perfect mix between slow gameplay and Battlefield map sizes. That is the appeal.

File: 1706144293519.png (385 KB, 901x628)

385 KB PNG

I was waiting for both games and have been following ’83 for a long time. But most likely, ’83 won’t even make it to the closed beta of HLL Vietnam.

red orchestra 2 filled a really nice niche of having autism milsim combat in a small map so you aren't spending your time running from points. battlefield is the only game out there now that has players.

File: 1727997764233.png (782 KB, 815x1003)

782 KB PNG

>>737508947
Registration is still open, though there are more than 100000 applications.

File: 1749412031372896.png (158 KB, 572x380)

158 KB PNG

>no PVE
Bro nobody likes these bush sniping games, Squad did it first so that's why it still has a playerbase even though it's fucking garbage, none of the imitations last. I'm still mad Rising Storm 2 is dead because they didn't include bots or PVE so you're forced into the PVP sweatfest which nobody stuck around for after a month.

File: 1766457408525516.gif (1.04 MB, 500x550)

1.04 MB GIF

>>737508694
U dont drive logi trucks in HLL though unless you really want to, supplies for bases are usually dropped by commander via parachute

And nothing is stopping you from joining a squads that are going frontal assault on the next objective, that will always be a constant firefight

The only real problem is when you have those gay russian front maps like Kursk, where if theres a good crew in a tank they can just close off large sections of the map (since its just plains lol)

Deep down I think we all knew that six months wasn't enough to fix all the crap that made it such a letdown in November, especially considering they had more than enough development time by that point, but still sucks to see.

A few weeks back I had a dream that I was back in RS2 having a blast in the jungle. Almost tempted to reinstall and try to see if I can experience some of that again, but at this point I feel it's better to let it remain a fond memory and move on.
>Don't cry because it's over; smile because it happened

>>737508947
I registered for the beta and they just sent me a mail with invite. No preorder or anything

>>737510821
>gay russian front maps like Kursk, where if theres a good crew in a tank they can just close off large sections of the map (since its just plains lol)
*and then you have to go on a trip through Narnia to progress around them, ie. through trenches

>>737510103
>PVP sweatfest which nobody stuck around for after a month.
Why do you just make things up?

>>737510875
Not him but I signed up weeks ago and haven't gotten any email yet :(

File: 1695596585921.png (76 KB, 972x556)

76 KB PNG

how this not grab milsimbums release money and run

>>737511207
Are you white though? (and I mean actually white, no r*ssian "white" or couse)

File: Screenshot 2026-04-23 142501.png (300 KB, 1033x217)

300 KB PNG

>when you play a bad game and use it as a basis for avoiding future bad purchases

>>737511423
i am

>>737510875
I got invited too do we have to download something thru the link to join the playtest ?

>>737510872
I replayed RS2 yesterday and it was still fun, even if my team got raped for rounds.
Hearing the "ting" of a headshot is never not gonna feel good

>>737511756
If you didn’t receive a Steam key by email, then no.

>>737511928
The mail said i got invited to the playtest maybe i haven't gotten the key send yet, thanks

>>737512187
That’s what they tell everyone. Those who were invited to the first wave of the closed beta test get a Steam key sent to them.

>>737512187
Since you have to link your Steam to sign up, they'll probably just add it to your account automatically when it starts. That's what I would assume.

>>737511836
I remember the sound of getting headshotted in RS2 at the release. Fucking earrape with how loud it was, especially when wearing a helmet, for something that you can almost never see coming. Was one of my biggest peeves with the game at the time. Months later they added an audio setting to lower it which made it fine, but I don't know what they were thinking not doing that at the start or at least setting it at a more reasonable volume.

>>737488086
I know. I spoke heavily against the absolutely retarded decision to have the BTK be 2 shots for 5.56 during the alpha. Low an behold: everyone used the FAL with long barrel because it could 1 shot like OG Insurgency then when they nerfed that the m14. Dishonest jerks.

Is '83 the replacement for the Kino that is Insurgency though? I will only buy if I can 1 shot 1 kill for high lethality gunplay.

RS2 was great on launch but any time after that, it was over. Did they ever even patch the RCEs? Servers were maintained by russian hackers that gave players computer AIDS if they connected to those servers, which were the only servers that existed, because the hackers DDOSed all the normal human servers. That's what killed the franchise.

>>737513173
Every time I want to play RS2 again, I remember this and decide not to. A shame because it was a great game. Those hacked servers were such cancer and last time I played they were all there was and disguised themselves as legitimate ones (which are really just redirects and not real).

>>737512732
There are only 450 people playing this right now, so no, I don't think it's replacing a damn thing.

File: well-bye-bye.gif (453 KB, 480x202)

453 KB GIF

>>737482087
>smaller peak than the furry shooter

File: 1648790818962.png (139 KB, 526x668)

139 KB PNG

guys

>>737514270
Deadest Concord-like yet

>>737508898
Arma 3

Looks like I'll keep sticking with Project Reality.

>>737514343
reddit bums still coping that 500 still ok

File: 1748353394425.jpg (219 KB, 466x350)

219 KB JPG

>guys don't leave negative comments, its only early access
>the devs will fix it, it's a passion project
>the playercount will surge on the weekend, trust the plan
>i think $30 for 3 maps is a great deal
I feel like I've head all of this before

if only Battlefield 6 Portal is functional I managed to create a Tripwire-like experience of some sort back in launch now they abandoned the mode in favour of as usual battle royale mode blergh

>>737515908
I'm so fucking tired of Steam forum and reddit bootlickers defending every single overpriced barebones early access game like this

>"$30 is cheap, I thought it would be more expensive"
>"Don't you have a job?"
>"How is $30 too much money, are poor?"

It's gotta be bots... right?

Don't care much for the setting. There's no cold war turned hot scenario where Russia doesn't get absolutely obliterated.

>>737484243
>>>Can't preorder
this is a good thing, preorders are a terrible business practice

>>737482087

Considering the amount of dev hell time this went through, I'm sure my 1080 PC rig is too weak to play this remotely as smooth as RS2.
If i can even boot it, did they add TPM checks and secure fag shit?
What happened with project literally WHO Igi when they went bust?

The game seems very generic overall, does offer anything new as far as shooters go

>>737517269
It's an Unreal Engine 5 game, it runs like shit pretty much no matter what.

>>737517103
there's also no cold war turned hot that involves any amount of boots on the ground infantry combat, since it'd just be lobbing nukes

File: 1667713912625.png (203 KB, 443x472)

203 KB PNG

Will they be able to break out of here?

>>737518254
Unless they weren't already desperate for cash to keep funding development, I don't think so...

No FAL No play
Seriously the OG trailer was cooler.
https://youtu.be/t5WdhWwYtsQ

>>737519003
>2019
goddamn

>>737485907
>battlefield 6 was absolute ass
How so?