[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: UBS_Boxart_341x450[1].jpg (40 KB, 341x450)
40 KB JPG
>4 still holds up in gameplay and graphics
>3 has been a dumpster fire in both ways since launch day
>remake 4
Why is Ubisoft retarded?
>>
cos nobody wants to replay 3
>>
File: resync2.jpg (3.52 MB, 3840x2160)
3.52 MB JPG
>>737549241
OG black flag does not hold up at all
>>
>>737549293
Because this is Ubi finally letting go of the modern day in assassins creed. 3 hinges entirely on the modern day narrative whereas 4 is just "bruh you're QA now fuck off back to Cuba"
>>
because 4 will sell and 3 wouldn't, duh
>>
I tried to replay brack frag about a month ago and even though nvidia supposedly updated their new cards with physx compatibility, I still couldn't get the game to run with physx on more than a couple minutes before crashing.
>>
File: resync.jpg (3.93 MB, 3840x2160)
3.93 MB JPG
>>737549339
it looks so good i already preboughted
>>
>>737549293
Maybe they would if it was actually a good game that didn't force you through 6 hours of tutorial missions, only for the rest of the game to be mindless paint-by-numbers objectives and a barren open world
>>
>>737549241
>remaded AC4, which literally no one asked
>siphons players from the original
>in turn MP gets even less players
>gets shutted down shortly after
>4's MP is the only AC MP still standing, and they need to rid of it
this is the real plan
>>
>>737549339
nah it does hold up. played it less than 2 years ago.

the faces and facial animations are better than in the current engine, which is what the remake is using, so look forward to extremely stilted and janky looking cutscenes.

the water simulation is better than in the current engine. look forward to storms and massive waves not working as well as in the original.

you're also going to lose that semi realistic, semi stylized artstyle because every advancement in modern graphics is geared towards achieving photorealism
>>
>>737549339
It looks pretty and is fun to play
>>
File: sdfdssd.jpg (1.26 MB, 1833x1031)
1.26 MB JPG
>>737549809
blind
>>
>>737549939
soul v soulless
>>
>>737549293
/thread
Never even finished that pos.
>>
>people still getting filtered by 3
kek
>>
>>737549939
ive seen that sky and clouds in like 3 other ubishart games

how original
>>
>>737549939
>blind
yes, you are. the cutscenes look worse than in the original >>737542775

they also didn't show storms or rogue waves, so my guess they fucked it up and the original is better >>737543978
>>
https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/1su41vc/ac4_resynced_courtesan_is_big_whale_smh/

They're nerfing all females my uncs. The main bitch got her tits drained and covered, and the street sluts are now whales

And we have only seen a glimpse of what the game has to offer! Even this cherrypicked location is full of sussy amogus if you pay close attention.
>>
>>737549241
Wasn't 3 part of a trilogy
>>
>>737549789
You're telling me people actually still play BF multiplayer?
>>
File: ubisoft hard at work.png (412 KB, 720x546)
412 KB PNG
>>737549241
More importantly, how is Ubisoft gonna fuck it up?
>>
File: löllöä.jpg (1.11 MB, 1831x1027)
1.11 MB JPG
>>737550058
youre blind
>>
>>737549939
>>737549939
"Holding up" does not mean "looks just as good as modern titles"

Also, this new parkour looks fucking garbage. It's crazy that they're shilling back and side ejects as a feature when the original already had them, but without the jank that comes from the RPG-Creed system
>>
>>737549241
>zoomoids will buy it anyways because it has fancier graphics
>while also requiring like 20 times the processing power the original did
More like why are zoomers retarded
>>
>>737549241
Why are (You) retarded?
>>
>>737550058
>yes, you are. the cutscenes look worse than in the original >>737542775
lmao ts nigga is complaining about lack of piss filters
>>
>>737550193
is your script broken? you keep posting the same cherrypicked spot in the game

>the cutscenes look worse than in the original
>they also didn't show storms or rogue waves, so my guess they fucked it up and the original is better
>>
File: AC4 compare.mp4 (3.99 MB, 1280x720)
3.99 MB MP4
>>737550193
>needs tailored screenshots to prove his point
Here actual footage to compare.
>>
>>737550193
This reminds of that fallout 4 mod that added overgrown trees everywhere which completely destroyed the experience despite looking better
>>
>>737549789
>remaded
>shutted
>they need to rid of it
Your fellow countrymen are the ones who made this game.
>>
>>737550432
unc is nostalgic for piss filters lmao
>>
File: 1748923976595796.png (985 KB, 1308x612)
985 KB PNG
>>737550391
and the lack of reflections

lack of storms

lack of rogue waves

lack of actual facial animations
>>
>>737550504
unc shilling for piss filters in 2026 oh no no no
>>
>>737550504
Is this the Black Fag?
>>
File: 1770034882893601.png (1.02 MB, 1052x636)
1.02 MB PNG
>>737550432
who the fuck is the guy on the right even supposed to be?

fucking charlie from lost?

HE DOESN'T EVEN LOOK LIKE THE SAME FUCKING CHARACTER LOL
>>737550559
you're not even an amusing troll. shoo.
>>
File: ikoplj.jpg (1.13 MB, 1836x1031)
1.13 MB JPG
>>737550432
youre blind
>>
>>737550614
>muh heckin sepia piss filter
add it with reshade
>>
>>737550486
>>737550559
shill
>>
>>737549241
i think u r the retard, their only options for remakes (games anyone even cares about) are AC2, and Black Flag. Nobody gives a fuck about the other ones.
>>
>>737550673
>i love yellow piss filters from the ps3
lmao millenniuncs lost the plot
>>
>>737549241
SAME PHILOSOPHY AS CAPCOM CHOOSING TO REMAKE RE4 BEFORE THEY REMADE RE CODE VERONICA

AC4 is guaranteed money so they can then use the profits from ac4 remake to generate new assets required for the much more expansive and financially riskier AC1 Remake
>>
>>737550709
they could also just try to make a new game and not royally fuck it up this time
>>
>this looks worse because the sunset is less brown in a cutscene o algo
>>
>>737549408
Works on my steam deck fine
>>
File: 1776083234471415.png (362 KB, 842x806)
362 KB PNG
>>737550432
i do think the characters themselves are too pretty, the originals have a grime and uglyness to them that fits the setting, wasn't translated well into the remake where everyone looks like a male model, even the nigga looks too zesty, environments look great in resynced though
>>
>>737550126
I could actually believe that they've quarantined everyone who would push for modern-audiencing the project. Ubisoft is in desperate need of a safe, easy win; they literally cannot afford to intentionally fuck it up. As for UNintentional fuck-ups, well...
>>
>>737550827
>charcters in games should look attractive
>aaaieeeeeeeeee not like THAT!
>>
>>737550193
piss-filter bros... we've been abandoned
>>
>>737550620
>left clouds: highly detailed, clear, physical appearance of actual clouds
>right clouds: blurred smudged reconstructed heaps of trash, with clipping red channel creating pink highlights at broad daylight
>>
>>737550878
who are you quoting?
>>
>>737549241
AC4 came out at the tail end of "everything's brown or grey" era, so I'm very much okay with some more color
>>
>>737550667
>>737550721
>>737550884
>"mm-m-m-m-m-muh boogieman!"
>ignore the missing facial animations and reflections and nonexistent tonemapping
KEK
>>
>>737550076
>Dude every oldgen AC Courtesan had sexy body thats why they are a courtesan, but in remake they are big whale, are Edward supposed to hunted them with Harpoon?
Dear God...
>>
I don't see why the shill's against piss so much. His fellow countrymen drinks it from cows.
>>
>>737550741
They can also reuse a shit ton of assets they made for Skull & Bones. That's 100% why this remake exists in the first place
>>
>>737551002
that's just the only talking point the marketing team gave him. they'll need to spin up some more though, even normies are nooticing the fucked up lighting.
>>
I'm tired of faggots hate posting on a remake just because.
Wake me up when the game releases so I can have my fun.
>>
>>737550904
lmao making stuff up now

>>737550951
brother the ps3 character models are ps2 tier
>>
>>737550802
>literal bullshot
>>
File: 1775649975740773.jpg (1.95 MB, 7690x2161)
1.95 MB JPG
>remake get's downgraded
Many such cases
>>
>>737551145
>brother the ps3 character models are ps2 tier
so were the facial animations of the last game
>>
File: 1758176723486448.png (499 KB, 808x462)
499 KB PNG
>>737551145
go stand in front of a moving train, rajesh
>>
Have you fags not played any of the ubi games?

>muh mocap!!! muh facials!!! muh HD
They do that shit *ONLY* in the beginning. Once you've played for an hour you'll start noticing that they've fallbacked to procgen animations
>>
File: retards.jpg (1.28 MB, 1831x1031)
1.28 MB JPG
>>737551291
>AAAAIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEH THE NIGGER NPC DOESNT LOOK SWEATY AND BEAUTIFUL ENOUGH I LITERALLY CANNOT PLAY THIS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIEHHHHEHAAAAAAAAA
>>
>>737549371
>Because this is Ubi finally letting go of the modern day in assassins creed.
Shadows is literally continuing to get updates to the Animus Ego story so no, not at all. They just saw no reason to redo it because it's not following up on 3 this time and is more like a standalone game right now.
>>
>>737550884
Is it a piss filter when it's only like that at certain time of day?
>>
>>737549939
Another washed out foggy remake, modern gaming is hopeless
>>
>>737551379
>fuck up face models, facial animations, lighting and reflections
>remove sexy women, replace them with whales
>add anti soul gas
that'll be 60 dollars
>>
>>737550620
Chat i'm finna print this out and hang it on my wall
What visual spectacle O_O
>>
File: eheh.jpg (1.5 MB, 1835x1031)
1.5 MB JPG
>>737551486
kek you lost, no one thinks the og looks better but jaded 4uncs who hate everything
>>
>>737551291
just goes to show how previous generation artists and modelers could do more with less, a lost art form in gamedev
>>
>>737551608
I know you never played these games and never will, but the story is one of the main things people care about in these games.

If the cutscenes look worse than in a 13 year old game, then you're getting swindled.
>>
File: hahah.jpg (1.21 MB, 1837x1030)
1.21 MB JPG
>>737551415
original is more washed out and foggy, you lost. tard
>>
File: 1769102257598036.jpg (448 KB, 1920x1080)
448 KB JPG
>original is more washed out
KEK
>>
File: sdfdssds.jpg (1.41 MB, 1835x1028)
1.41 MB JPG
>>737551648
remake looks better. youre literally crying over a nigger not being wet enough. its your only cope. you have no other examples.

you lost.
>>
If you're trying to sell me on this remake, you're doing a terrible job.
>>
>>737551846
>remake looks better

Sure about that? https://youtu.be/ZdLuZvWHJcw?t=46
>>
>>737551816
youre so close to figuring out how weather cycles and time of day work
>>
File: hahahaha.jpg (1.35 MB, 1834x1029)
1.35 MB JPG
>>737551998
another washed out foggy ps3 game, 7th gen gaming was hopeless
>>
>>737551846
Shill with less hate in your heart faggot.
>>
File: Untitled.png (2.47 MB, 1836x1031)
2.47 MB PNG
>>737550620
Left is way better as far as the backdrop is concerned. There's something about backdrops that use different assets than the same ones in the open world that make them much more fascinating and exotic. I think it reinforces the sense of scale in that you as a player cannot visit this area so therefore it must be massive and huge and interesting. Makes it feel like a fantasy.
>>
Remake looks better
>>
File: yeah.jpg (1.91 MB, 1834x1029)
1.91 MB JPG
>>737552286
Looks low res and terrible.
>>
remake is made by chinks

i thought /v/ loves chink games and hates westerners?
>>
File: 1776453984845978.jpg (39 KB, 535x396)
39 KB JPG
>>737552367
>
>>
>>737552367
Low res doesn't automatically mean bad. If you have taste anyway. Also it doesn't necessarily have to be low res either, it's like a matte painting. They could still achieve a similar effect I imagine if they used higher resolution textures.
Your screenshot looks "good" but it's boring. There's nothing otherworldly about it. Videogames should try to capture that feeling of being fantastical and outlandish
>>
>>737552286
>different assets
What? Also, you can count the fucking polygons on that geometry.
I stopped giving a fuck about AssCreed way back since Brotherhood, but old good new bad fags are literally just making shit up in their heads now. This is one of the cases where the remake easily looks better.
>>
File: >made by chinks.jpg (20 KB, 470x149)
20 KB JPG
>>737552420
Do you know what a chink is?
>>
You can't post in this thread unless you curse vishnu right now.
>>
File: AHAHAHAHAHAH.jpg (1.06 MB, 1835x1027)
1.06 MB JPG
>>737552502
>when uncs want to talk about the *peak* of graphics and they post ts
>>
>>737550614
>"fucking charlie from lost?"
Thought he looked more like Charlie Hunnam from Sons of Anarchy.
>>
>>737549241
Who would buy 3 again? WHERE'S LEE WHERE'S LEE WHERE'S LEE and the setting is boring.
>>
>>737552517
What do you mean what? Like in the screenshot on the left that mountain asset would never be used on something up close in the open world that you can explore. Conversely, in the right screenshot the trees and rocks look the exact same as the ones in the explorable open world except that they are further away. My point is that this is boring, it makes the world seem small and uninteresting. There is something to be said for inaccessible skyboxes and backdrops in games that are done in an artistic way with a real sense of scale
>>
>>737552583
I mean I wouldn't call this the peak of graphics but the mountains have a better sense of scale than anything I've seen in the resynced screenshots. I'm not saying it's objectively better in every sense but in that one specific case yes it beats out the remake
>>
File: ertgfsdsd.png (673 KB, 1019x333)
673 KB PNG
>+40 year olds will tell you left looks more life like
kekaroo
>>
>>737552583
Now post the ps4 version instead of the downgraded ps3 version for brokies
>>
ummm switchsisters, when do we get the remake?
>>
File: 1760307841394322.png (688 KB, 887x762)
688 KB PNG
>>737551846
let's try again. this time i will give you horse blinders.

look at the example provided

look at the missing facial animations in the remake. how are you meant to pretend that a remake, where they completely butcher edward kenway's characterization, is somehow better than the game which made everyone appreciate the character due to his swagger, swagger which you can't depict with literally missing facial animations
>>
>>737549469
not bad at all honestly
>>
>>737552583
>shill keeps posting bullshots from havana
>in the 1 example of the original he posts a shot from a random beach
why are you so scared of a 13 year old game beating your demake
>>
File: image.png (348 KB, 859x603)
348 KB PNG
>>737552517
>you can count the fucking polygons on that geometry.
and?
>>
reckon they changed the first person modern day segments?
anons hated those but i thought they were fun
>>
>>737552663
What do you mean the "mountain asset"? Do you mean a collection of polygons protruding from the sea that is unique? And the one on the right isn't? Do you know for a fact that those trees and rocky texture isn't reused elsewhere, and the ones in the remake are, and you can tell all of that from a single screenshot?

What you're saying just isn't making sense to me. Those trees in the distance look like any regular trees. If anything, the mountain trees in the remake look more lush than the trees in the city at a glance, but then again, that's probably not the case for either game.
>>
File: uncshits.jpg (1.28 MB, 1831x1033)
1.28 MB JPG
>>737552805
>instead of the downgraded ps3 version for brokies
its literally from anons GIGA RAYTRACED SUPREME 4K TEXTURE mod he posted here >>737551998 LMAOOOO

>>737552830
you lost tranny >>737552789
remake looks a million times better no one cares about the exaggerated, nonsensical reflection on his face, hes not a mirror. right looks more lifelike.

you lost and youre a complete retard if you think remake in pic related looks worse.

like i said, youre still hyperfocusing on a single cutscene that doesnt even look worse, everything is more realistic.
>muh art
piss filter is not art.
>>
File: 1766986296588672.png (128 KB, 261x286)
128 KB PNG
>>737552789
they don't even look the same person.

it's like ubi just pulled a random caucasian male model's face from a free library because the original facescans were outdated and they couldnt use them, then just slapped him in edward conways cosplay.
>>
>>737553019
It's been completely cut out because the hack developers couldn't make it interesting for the braindead mulattos who will buy this demake
>>
File: ujhgf.jpg (1.3 MB, 1836x1027)
1.3 MB JPG
>>737552939
youve literally been reposting the nigger and that 1 single cutscene for the entire thread providing zero other examples while ive been posting countless different comparisons.

read the comments on every video, theyre 100% positive. like i said, only jaded 4uncs who hate everything are crying about their lack of brown piss filterino
>>
>>737553069
>they don't even look the same person.
good because the ps3 version looks like complete dogshit. why would he look the same? hes not even textured properly.
>>
>>737553132
Remake looks like washed out fog slop fail screenshot
>>
>>737553031
>What do you mean the "mountain asset"? Do you mean a collection of polygons protruding from the sea that is unique?
so you know what I mean? You're just pretending to be retarded
>Do you know for a fact that those trees and rocky texture isn't reused elsewhere, and the ones in the remake are, and you can tell all of that from a single screenshot?
I don't know that. In fact they probably aren't the same ones that are used up close. My point is that they *look* like the same ones that are used up close. Yes they are more lush in that screenshot but that is simply because there are more of them relative to the rest of the screenshot which is a fucking city so of course it isn't going to be that lush. They are the exact same color as the ones in the foreground, same as the rocks. It all looks the exact same, it's boring and uninteresting. You keep trying to point to polygon count as the reason the left "sucks" but polygon count has nothing to do with why I like it. The reason it looks good is specifically because it doesn't look like anything in the foreground or explorable open world. They could use a higher polygon count and still achieve that.
>>
>>737553235
now now lets look at >>737553047 where the original looks like washed out fog slop

still gonna cry about your niggers being less sweaty?
>TS NIGGA BE LESS SWEATY UNFG LETS IGNORE THE IMPROVED LIGHTING TEXTURES ASSETS CHARACTER MODELS LEVEL OF DETAIL AND DRAW DISTANCE CHAT LOOK AT THIS NIGGA HAVING LESS SWEAT
>>
>>737553316
Racism has no place here
>>
>>737552789
Right literally looks better.
>inb4 the shitty looking bronze skin and a slightly more furrowed brow means muh artistic expression is lost
At that point, you're completely against the idea of remakes that slightly changes the visuals. That's fine, I guess, but this isn't remotely close to how Demon's Souls and SOTC got butchered by BluePoint.
>>
File: 1747547433894248.jpg (234 KB, 2560x1440)
234 KB JPG
>>737553047
keep burying your head in the sand and trying to claim the remake is better when it objectively fumbled the bag with the facial mocap, facial animations, face scans or face models or all of them since the end result looks worse than a 13 year old game
>>737553132
>>737553069
again, your strawman in face of actual criticisms you are hoping will just go away if you keep repeating that the lighting, the reflections, the poor facial mocap, poor facescans are okay.

and the fact you bring up the nigger as an attempt to deflect and strawman is ironic because the game uses the same mocap/face rendering tech as nu-creeds do, all of which have been criticized for their lackluster, soulless facial animations and mocap that looks worse than their premodern games
>>
File: 1775811945305493.png (58 KB, 220x221)
58 KB PNG
>>737553446
i see you still cant post a different example but that one nigger
you lost

>>737553446
>actual criticisms
see >>737553358
>>
>>737553446
>lighting, the reflections, the poor facial mocap, poor facescans are okay.
All better in the remake. You're delusional.
>>
>>737549241
Because 3 is ass in all aspects and 4 has boats

Also because even old version of 3 runs better than 4 on my semi-modern PC
>>
>>737553358
Right doesn't even look like edward because the face animations glitched out, but I guess you're not past pretending that's not the case and he's supposed to look like a different character

>>737553542
I posted an example of the main character not looking like edward because the animations glitched out.

And I'm posting the same example because that's the only example we have you goddamn retard.

>>737553624
So we're literally down to last bit of ammo, the "NA NA NA NOT LISTENING"?
>>
File: Untitled.png (2.92 MB, 1831x1033)
2.92 MB PNG
>>737553047
which do you guys like better
>>
File: 1747174721985185.png (433 KB, 421x457)
433 KB PNG
>>737553069
again who the fuck is this?

where is the distinct rugged look, the high cheekbones, square jaw, why is his face ballooned out like a fat middle aged guy?
>>
>>737553284
Now you're changing your argument and it's not even about having unique assets, but rather that the background simply looks different.

Anyway, the difference in color is because the sun isn't reflecting on the landscape in the original game, whereas the remake is, giving the "same" yellowish tone to both the mountain and city trees. You can even make the case that because of those technical limitations, it gives the older games a more unique look.

However, I disagree in this case. From that screenshot, the original doesn't look "exotic" to me or anything like that, but instead is more washed out / has flat lighting compared to the foreground, and I'm not even considering the remake when I say that.
>>
>>737553132
backdrop looks like complete ass in the remake lmao. Everything else is fine aside from it being a bit too blue
>>
do you think they gave us an option to remove the ugly as fuck blowgun?
>>
>>737553667
>because the face animations glitched out
It's a shame the animations weren't glitched in the original, it would have looked better then.
>>
File: 1745817401308066.jpg (2.45 MB, 1920x810)
2.45 MB JPG
>>737549939
soul / soulless
>>
>>737554043
I'm really not changing my argument, that's just semantics. If the background assets look the exact same as the foreground ones then what does it matter if they are technically different (which we still do not know we are just speculating based of an image). From a visual perspective, which is exactly what this whole discussion is centered around, they are effectively the same thing.
Yes I agree it does look washed out and flat. Ironically that's part of why I think it looks good. I think it does a better job of emulating something like pic related than the remake does.
>>
>>737550432
What's the point when there's so little difference? Are they adding a shitload of new content?
>>
>troll pretending to be a shill had his dopamine rush and got tired of trolling
many a such case
>>
>>737549241
because this is the only AC thats actually worth playing
>>
>>737549939
Why are the colors in remade games always less vibrant and more washed out? Every remade game looks the same for some reason.
>>
>>737554735
dynamic rendering. mainly RTGI, which acts as a giant lightbulb in the sky mimicking the color of the sky, which during daytime just means it paints everything in white light which tends to overpower texture colors
>>
>>737550614
That's been bugging me too
>>
>>737549241
They already remastered 3 and no one gave a shit. It is just fundamentally a dogshit game. And fuck those disgusting fake French Quebec fucks for trying to paint George Washington as a retard failure. They even invalidate his rejection of being kind of America. Fuck ac3
>>
ITT: Some pajeet shill demonstrates he doesn't know what "holds up" means
>>
>>737554435
It matters because the *assets* are (most likely) the same, just that the lighting is interacting in a more limited way. It's not semantics at all.
>pic
Nothing about that image looks foggy though. If you take out the depth of field in the remake (it'll probably be a setting that you can turn off, I hate that shit almost always) then it should resemble that landscape more. That's especially true in this pic >>737553047. The original doesn't even have trees in the closest mountain, and the fog almost makes it look like the furthest mountain belongs in a snowy environment.
>>
File: ac3-scenery.jpg (1.27 MB, 1920x1080)
1.27 MB JPG
>>737555002
everyone hates on ac3 but the frontier will always be kino environment design
>>
this looks like shit
https://x.com/AccessTheAnimus/status/2047359547237441542
>>
File: image.png (1.38 MB, 1360x877)
1.38 MB PNG
>>737555193
>just that the lighting is interacting in a more limited way.
and what's your point?
The picture you linked does have trees in the mountains though so I'm not really sure what you mean about that.
Look it's pretty simple overall. Disregarding fog or lighting or whatever it's clear which one looks more like the real thing in pic related. The remake focuses too much on being realistic in the sense that every asset used is actually to scale and ironically it looks less realistic because of it. The real world is massive. In the real life mountain in pic related all the trees just look like a bunch of green mash over the mountain. The don't look like they have individual lighting on each one because it is all so far away that it all blends together. The screenshot from the original AC4, while not being perfect, does a far better job of emulating that than the remake does. If you're actually trying to argue that it doesn't then you're blind and I dunno what to tell you.
>>
File: 1775120582213238.jpg (1.76 MB, 2560x1440)
1.76 MB JPG
>>737555312
its ironic that facial animations/models peaked with unity, a game that was initially gangraped by the public for its technical issues
>>
>>737555312
looks the same? i don't notice anything new beyond the improved visuals
>>
I just booted up AC BF. It's capped at 60fps on 4K. So a remaster is acceptable.
>>
>>737550084
if you manage to launch the "AC4BFMP" exe, without experiencing weird bugs and shit, then yes, you might encounter players during peak hours/weekends
>>
>ADDITIONAL NOTES: The game must be installed on a SSD.
>>
>>737558442
People don't do that?
>>
>>737549789
>4's MP is the only AC MP still standing, and they need to rid of it
The only time multiplayer was ever good in AC was Brotherhood. Revelations added Contested Kills, nerfed Charge and Smoke Bombs heavily, and lowered gun cooldowns ruining the game from a stealth aspect turning it into rooftop runner central.
3 and Black Flag further buffed the gun to stupid levels meaning everyone ran it, nerfed stealth play considerably by keeping Contested Kills, made so many maps that have enormous sight lines making it impossible to hide successfully, and refused to patch in any sort of negative for a player who decided to run into your group in High Profile to force you to be singled out to get the 100 point kill while you get nothing.

It's extremely telling how poison is almost impossible to land in the post-Brotherhood games while in Brotherhood it was -the- strategy for high level play because it meant the equivalent of 16 kills if you could land it fully and people never high profiled into groups. I will never forget one time when I played either 3 or BF (I think it was BF) and there was this icy crashed ship map and like a third if not half of the map is completely flat with a few hallways built into the ice so in order to even begin hiding you had to go in high profile, run down into the icy hallways, and then hope you were near a group you could hide by which the high profile players just ran from above and shot you or ran into the adjoining hallway area and ran into your group staggering you into a kill.

AC multiplayer truly was garbage after ACB and I sincerely doubt they ever would have walked back their gun changes since they continuously pandered to rooftop runners, and high profile players were pretty much constant because of how people could abuse it with very little way to counteract that because the downside was already that you earned virtually no points.
>>
>>737554658
You simply got BTFO'd hard, no one thinks the original looks better and the only thing, again, the only thing you ever brought up to "prove your point" was that there were more sweat drops on some nigger NPC. You lost.
>>
>>737559368
smoke bomb deserved the nerf
>>
>>737562113
Agreed, but they basically gutted it instead of finding a middleground. People would rather run Fireworks where you could see through the blindness like 70% of the way more than it it was that worthless.
>>
This whole thread reads like some Ubisoft intern trying to shill the game
holy shit, fuck off
>>
>>737555312
>it literally looks worse
LOL

fucking hell I hope no one buys this shit
>>
File: 1755959984557907.jpg (807 KB, 1920x1080)
807 KB JPG
>>737553047
left looks better
>>
>>737550614
He looks more like the e3 cinematic edward desu
>>
>>737558442
Who doesnt play on an ssd these days?
>>
>>737550614
soul / soulless
both look bad

only retarded goys will get the remake
>>
File: r62rzpbovwk81.jpg (99 KB, 841x1172)
99 KB JPG
>>737559368
it absolutely is way past its prime, but as far as i know only AC4 has organic matches (for now)
>>
>>737567664
Mildly related, but it's funny that Unity has quicker match-making than it did at launch.

What being the last actual AC game does to a mf
>>
File: 1754004291815973.png (3.55 MB, 1920x1080)
3.55 MB PNG
This is the girl.
>>
File: Repainted.jpg (1.98 MB, 1948x1431)
1.98 MB JPG
>>737553132
>countless different comparisons.
And the original one is always better on every single one of them
>>
>>737549241
This was the only good assassin's creed game and Ubisoft is broke.
>>
File: 1755476982598581.png (2.3 MB, 1920x1080)
2.3 MB PNG
>>
>>737549241
>>737549241
>>737549241
Does anyone know if the Switch port of 4 is good?
No I don’t have anything else to play it on.
>>
>>737549241
>4 still holds up in gameplay and graphics
I sure do love Tailing Missions Creed and copy-pasted sugar plantations!
>>
>>737550076
>r/KoakuInAction
You faggots really are stuck in 2016 lmao
>>
>>737572863
kotakuinaction is gay but your gayer
>>
>>737573175
my gayer is you, anon



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.