Can I have sex with ANY vidya character I want using ai?(Pic not related)
>AI A little vague. What were you looking for? I'm sure that's something you can do no problem with silly tavern. You got some hoops to jump through if you're going full blown pedophile but past that you're golden.
>>737609503No you cannot as binary code cannot love you nor provide carnal pleasure
>>737609503Actually pic is very related
>>737609503Yes, you can, using SillyTavern.I will say, AI Chatbots are a cursed rabbithole, so think twice before gazing into this abyss.
>>737609503Do not the drum.
>>737611696>tfw tumbling down the ST rabbit holeI haven't had this much fun in years.
>>737611696nta but the opportunity cost is too high. also RAWDOGGING it with grok isnt too bad.
>>737612716It sucked me in during the original CharacterAI threads here on /v/ and I haven't been out since.The amount of time and effort I've put into chatbots has reached LMAO levels.>>737612792It's worth it.>grokNobody in the scene even uses that. I'm sorry, but it's unusable. At least use Deepseek.
>>737612837>Nobody in the scene even uses that.it can handle cards better than ye olde sillytavern days, and it was good enough then. the 'problem' is that you can't be a total freak w/ it
>>737612837Is deepseek your go-to? Which model specifically? I tried it a couple times but maybe the free ones are just too mild or, more likely, I was too dumb to get ehat I wanted. I've been liking Kimi 2.5. Haven't tried 2.6 yet. Kimi was the first one that actually would get pushy and not be so wildly romance novel at me. Which I like a little romance and flowery prose but I like a little pushy too.
>>737613274>the 'problem' is that you can't be a total freak w/ itSo.. what he said. Unusable.
I've been only using gemini. Is deepseek better than it?
>>737613395I use Gemini the most but the recently released v4 Deepseek has been receiving nothing but praise at /aicg/.
you think one of these ai startup CEOs have done near-agi uncensored chatbot rp?
>>737613462>/aicg/Which one? /g/ or /vg/?
>>737613453Try it. I mean if you're new having people give you a couple models will get your foot in the door but you just won't know if you like it until you try it. Too many variables even before taking preference into account. Just grab a card and persona you've used, open a new chat, and dick around for a bit. Personally I'm not so hot on Opus, but I'm like 80% sure that the bulk of my complaints are user error. I'll give it a try again later. I don't like it, but plenty swear by it. If someone tells you something is great you really need to take it with a whole bowl of salt.
>>737609503>(Pic not related)Excuse me?
>>737613274>the 'problem' is that you can't be a total freak w/ it>he doesn't know the secret message to remove the content filters
>>737609503>(Pic not related)Y-you want to have sex with Takodon?The MALE ONE?
>>737614204The /g/ one is kinda dead, all the actual botmakies moved to /vg/.
>>737615304>botmakiesEh. Them tacking 'ies' on everything and no one capitalizing or punctuating is what drove me from them. The whole baby talk thing makes my skin crawl. I do owe them a raccoon though.
>>737616108It is kinda weird but a subcommunity having their own language and culture is soul so I don't mind it. Being super serious all the time is one of the things I dislike most about modern internet.
>>737609503>Pic not relatedBut why?
>>737616336Rock on, I genuinely hope you enjoy yourself. I don't mind the jargon and fucking around. I really don't. Usually I'm totally on board for that exact kind of nonsense. Hell, I'm military grade furry garbage and I indulge in a bit of cutsey talk. Just, yeah, it's all too baby talk for me and there's something about it that rubs me the wrong way. I'll quietly slip out the back once I get what I came for.
>>737609503>(Pic not related)coward
