[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Banjo_Kazooie_Cover.png (196 KB, 378x263)
196 KB
196 KB PNG
Who's the punkass who keeps saying "Banjo was never good" every thread? Are they some SJW who got triggered because Grunty says "wench"? This game was a 90s classic.
>>
>>737725642
its a smash rosterfag that doesn't like that he's in Ultimate.
>>
>>737725642
It's some Crocfag who's mad people talk about Banjo instead of Croc.
>>
Nothing 3D made by Rare was ever good. Troonlenials have no standards and just say the game was good because the N64 has like 5 good games in total and they want to feel vindicated having spent their childhood on bad games.
>>
>>737725642
Banjo was never good. It's a mediocre 3d collectathon. The Rare Replay version is the best one to play simply due to it actually saving your progress through a level. Oh, you have one note left and died? Collect them all again fuckface.
>>
>>737726456
Maybe croc should have had good controls then
>>
>>737725642
PS1 handily won the 5th gen but snoys still feel threatened by the N64's cultural relevance so they need to downplay all 5 notable N64 exclusives.
>>
File: 1777156639792643.gif (1.99 MB, 332x215)
1.99 MB
1.99 MB GIF
>>737726727
>>737726912
Your broke ass parents couldn't afford an n64? Getting those vibes lmao



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.