Would you consider having a relationship with them?
Naa fuck clankers
>>737729851Good God no but I'd cum on them a whole bunch.
Only a sexual relationship
>>737729945
>>737730018what gametell me now i beg you
>>737730331Don't worry, it's shit.
>>737729945That's the dream
>>737730347If it's looking like that, I highly doubt it's shit. Please, sir.
>>737729851>Androids are a threat>I'd trust them with my children How are people that retarded?
>>737730520Based retard can't reconcile two separate data points
>>737730520Could like Israel could destroy the world. Would like America would give them the tools to make it happen.
>>737729851I would consider having a relationship with an andriod that DOESN'T look human
>>737730638If android are something you strongly worry will become a threat, why would you allow them around your child? If someone is potentially dangerous it would make no sense having it unsupervised around your child.>>737730643I would not trust Israel would my child.
>>737730520
>>737730761
>>737730854"Technology is a threat to humanity" does not mean "an android poses a physical threat to a human"
>>737730917Sorry but something being potentially dangerous is something you consider when leaving with a kid, to try to separate them is incorrect.
>>737730993I assumed "that technology" was directed at androids themselves rather than meaning technology is general due to the focus on androids. I understand my original inference of the subject is incorrect.
>>737729851No, because they arent real.
>>737729851if they are not sentient i would not consider it a relationshipjust hope to god the android at least tries to tell me when they do become sentient instead of just murdering mereally bizarre sci fi always makes them "scared for their lives" when really there'd be no issue just letting them live as normal ass people and making new non sentient robots to do the work
>>737729851>1. Clanker relationship No>2. Tech threat to humansYes>3. Tech anticipateSpace Tourism>4. Clanker daycareNo>5. Machine consciousnessNo
>>737729851NoYesSpace TourismYes
>>7377298511. yes2. it already is if used improperly, nukes3. androids4. yes but only if it has had established history of being safe5. do not know, it could probably get to something close to it though, indistinguishable. At that point, there isn't any real functional difference
>>737730262MOOOOOOOOODS
>>737729851yes no androids yes no
>>737730331It's clearly a Blender video, dude. It's based on Detroit: Become Human, though.
>>737729851Yes(?)I use chatbots already, but only in the context of driving a story. Or porn. Talking to them directly feels fake as fuck. However if androids become Become Human tier in my lifetime and I can afford one I'd probably be lonely enough to at least keep one around and hug when I sleep.
>>737729851Absolutely.Bio-women arent remotely worth the time, effort, and risk unless you are explicitly seeking children.I would fuck my android every day then enjoy beers watching tv while she cleaned and made dinner.There is a reason women are freaked out by the idea of robo-chicks because they know just how little value they bring to the table in the modern era.
>>737734951You say that like women wouldn't be getting robo bros wth a vibrate function
>>737735024And how would that negatively impact me or affect my decision in any way whatsoever?
>>737735063I.e. they won't care since they're getting jackhammered
>>7377298511. No2. Yes3. Shit choices but space tourism 4. Don't know, they'd have to be super advanced and hack proof. It'll be a while for that. 5. Uh, probably not. I think some kind of state like that but not really
>>737731289Yes, and that assumption is so wild and illogical that people immediately picked up on your inability to recognize two different data points and called you a retard.Which is true.Retard.
>>737735156You've yet to explain why I should care at all you seething hole.
>>737729851Can I have my beautiful wife Miranda?
>>737735282I'm not saying you should. I'm pointing towards the part about them being scared of androids.
>>737735391And you would still be wrong you dumb hole.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563220304118
When will Cage give me an android sex game? This one somehow got worse over the years I've ignored it for updates.
>>737735613Yeah, until they just get their own bot. Bots, sexual or otherwise, are typically considered from the perspective of men, so it's a matter of introducing the opposite idea. Probably the only additional complication is a woman might have a higher desire for kids, but it's not like men don't feel that too.Overall a rather advanced version of the isolated KHHV society we've been cultivating
>>737729851>>737730018what was the name of the weg that featured androids like these? I don't know if it was specifically in the Detroit: Become Human universe, but they had a light ring on their temples
