anything but xcom 3 i guess
>>737826463you really think they are capable to develop xcom3 after most original devs left?
>tabletop game>after all the attention is gonebased retards
almost everyone involved with xcom is gone, do you really want an xcom 3 made by the "people" behind Civ 7?
>>737828619I mean Nu-Xcom happened so why not nu-nu-xcom
>trannytopNot suprising after Chimera Squad, they're catering to the same crowd
Is tabletop wargaming becoming a thing now? Mainly referring to this and gundam getting into the game.
>>737828965just let them cook once 3 is released you will look dumb
>>737829329Because Nu-Xcom was headed by Jake Solomon, an xcom-lover chad; meaning it could be halfway decent. Modern firaxis releasing xcom3 is monkey paw territory.
>>737829435No, 40k is the only wargame people play and even that is surviving in spite of the mismanagement and mistakes GW has been making since foreverIt's just that 40kfags are loud enough to make retarded boomers think it's a good idea to try and compete, hence why you have Gundam, Starcraft and now XCOM trying to enter the stage. Not so different to how every RTS was convinced it has to have a competetive scene only to crash and burn instantly because of Starcraft 2, or the current wave of Concordlikes that's still ongoingSuits are retarded, never forget that
>>737826463It pisses me off its dead and drowned. Replayed a whol bunch of xcom2 a year ago and had a blast, but felt lonely cause noone fucking cared about it for the past 10 years.Maybe that star wars game will be good, but wont get my hopes up.
>>737829634True but what if someone there was a nu-XCOM-lover chad?I know I'm pushing it, Solomon is a rare occurrence.
>>737829751???We have daily XCOM 2 threads.
>>737826463They don't have money for it, obviously, they are in the death spiral where they make cheaper and cheaper spinoffs
>>737829636I play historicals. got a early 1400's french and english force.But yah, GW has a stranglehold.
>>737829879Oh.
>>737829759XCOM must burn down every now and again, and be brought back by a team of new people.
>>737829948Nice anon. I used to play Battletech a few years ago, sadly online over Megamek since there's no local scene, just kikehammer
post yfw you realized xcom 2 is over ten years old
for me its napoleonics
>>737829902I guess this timeline isn't so bad then. Eventually the rights to the name might get sold off!
>>737829435>>737829636I think they are just hoping to sell the minis to people who aren't actually going to play the game. which, granted, is like 90% of what GW does I'm sure the minis grift is more popular now with the DND push and catan and shit over the last decade. like GW abandoned bloodbowl for like 15 years and have been, slowly, making products for it again over the last 10 years
>>737832641I agree with XCOM and StarCraft but Gundam already has Gunpla which is better in quality, release schedule and variation all than any wargame on the market, especially GW's. I honestly have no idea why they're trying to enter this market unless they noticed people don't actually play and only collect miniatures and they're just poaching
>>737832809I think they are just hoping people want to paint the minis and they get crossover with either 40k fags who want gundams or gunpla guys who kind of want to get into minis. Like there are power rangers gunpla now so those companies are experimenting with trying to sell plastic
>>737832809>better in qualityI woundly say so for Gunpla, but quality for the price I would agree.
