[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Is the game actually good? How does it compare to DRG or Helldivers? Also mods stop archiving this games threads

I feel like this game is gonna last a week
>>
early access
>>
>>738144429
Just like >>738144949 said.
They've announced EA for 12 months, minimum.
These types of games need to come out complete. That's why L4D(2) has staying power.
>>
>>738144429
it's basically gunfire reborn with a different skin. Enemies move just slightly faster than you so it's basically a game you play while shopping backwards, then you ride a horse to the next objective and bhop backwards some more

honestly, it's dogshit and the gameplay is a lot worse than drg
>>
>>738145148
True that always sucks

>>738145012
Its funny cause I see people talking about it everywhere and praising the game. But there is absolutely 0 discussion here and it has a negative consensus
>>
>>738144429
Map gen should've been more linearly structured, the open Helldivers POI map style gets old REALLY fast, like by the second run I was already bored of b-hopping around on the horse everywhere. Enemy variety is lackluster and every boss I saw was pretty much the exact same
>shoot the glowy bits and jump the aoe slams
with a different skin. Really disappointing for how polished the visuals and animations seem.
>>
>>738144429
Its pretty great, there's just nothing to talk about, the lack of voice lines also means no meme posting to keep threads alive. Its also not DRG at all, its structured like Helldivers 2 but with non randomized maps.
>>
>>738146845
Worth getting in your opinion? Im between this and dune awakening
>>
>>738144429
FOTM slop with a shocking lack of content. It'll be dead and forgotten in a month, if even.
>>
>>738145623
>But there is absolutely 0 discussion here

No shill campaign
>>
>>738146845
>non randomized maps

That's basically a death sentence for games like these.
>>
File: 3124540_6.jpg (528 KB, 1920x1080)
528 KB JPG
>>738147270
>Worth getting in your opinion?
Yes solely because its 20 bucks, it absolutely does not have the content to ask for more than that, but I believe you'll get your money's worth as it is.
There is a catch though, which is how much you enjoy exploration, because the maps aren't random the devs have added in exploration incentives, as well as every map has a side quest giver and a secret one that people online will absolutely skip over since they don't give anything and only one is mandatory to unlock new maps. So a handful of hours will come from you doing these things solo, and how much you will enjoy doing that is going to come down to personal preference and some secret quests being more cryptic(the Canyon one) or more annoying (the Desert one) than others if you don't want to look them up online.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.