[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/v/ - Video Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (1.36 MB, 1232x706)
1.36 MB PNG
>good first game
>instantly starts going downhill and never picks back up
>somehow gets 4 games total out of this formula
what causes this?
>>
consolefags
>>
If someone showed me Veilguard when the original released, I would've thought it was some elaborate joke.
We really do live in a clown world.
>>
>>738263756
This series in particular often seemed like they were trying to course correct off of what the last one did but never actually made enough improvements. In general, brand awareness helps a series coast through a lot of bad installments.
>>
>>738263756
>first game sells well
>second game sells well

thats it
the game is now the perceived cashcow of a greedy company and gets rushed release after rushed release



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.