What is the point of ANOTHER Starfox 64 remake when you can already just play the original on NSO?
They genuinely have no idea how to progress the story
Member berries
>>738345898whats the point of another thread when you can just reply to one of the many others
>>738345898This one has GRAFIX and CINEMATICS.
online battles are cool.
>>738345898poorfag
>>738345898Star Fox peaked with 64 and everything that came after sucked.
>>738346058>remake with realistic graphics for talking cartoon animals and a bigger focus on cinematics and cutscenesThis genuinely doesn't feel like a Nintendo game. It feels like "What if Sony or some Western AAA studio made a Star Fox game?"
So I can have my kid who hates polygons play it.(theoretical)
>>738345898Miyamoto seems to have been insisting "the NEXT Star Fox game will be exactly what it should've been from the start" for like 30 years. I don't care about the story of Star Fox, which means they can just make a sequel and not retread all the shit they've gone over a million times already.
>>738345898I'd like a remastered 64, but the new one is gonna have shit art. Zero was garbage because of the motion controls. It's literally impossible to get a good remake.
>>738345898Retard, you can play it on the 3DS
>>738345991Bullshit. Space is infinite; they can just pull a "an outside force is threatening to nuke the Lylat system. Star Fox must make their way through the Surgon System to get to their home base and stop them" plot and nobody would complain.
>>738348349>BullshitWell what other explanation is there as for why they keep remaking 64 (actually starfox SNES)?The only non-remake games in the series are ones there were developed outside nintendo, lol
>>738345898It’s weird because they usually remake games that aren’t on the service but then they get added later (Link’s Awakening, Mario VS Donkey Kong, maybe TTYD). But here it’s the reverse.
>>738345898You were supposed to shill the pc port, discord troon. Don’t go off script
>>738345991They did it 3 times before endless 64 remakes. Even if you want to erase Krystal, you can just go the route of Assault and set the game after the defeat of Andross with new enemy factions springing up due to the power vacuum
>>738345991There's no market for a new game like Star Fox 64, but there's a market for Star Fox 64 again chudsnoy
So is there a QRD on when the direct will be taken down? Because they showed some footage of various other modes that were VERY different from the N64 and we all proved it was fake. Why would Nintendo use fake clips in a direct? Isn’t stock fraud a crime in Japan?
>>738351191the fuck are you talking about
>>738351191Nurse! NURRRSE!!!Anon's off his meds again!!
>>738352538>>738353182See >>738345898, then compare to the direct:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ePZeyh5q9R8&pp=0gcJCU8Co7VqN5tD&ra=mIf Nintendo showed off features that will NOT be in the full game (since they weren’t in Star Fox 64), then they are committing false advertising, which means this game can be pulled from sale. Otherwise, you’re claiming that /v/ is lying, which never happens.
Star Fox 64 was already a remake of Star Fox SNES.
Here's my problem: I really miss the original SNES Corneria themehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyYdm54Nx3sIt was so lit that it even came back hidden in Star Fox 2.
>>738346356This. I think this is the moment it feels like Nintendo has officially lost touch.
>>738345991Bro there are two giant gaps in the chronology to slap games into, between 64 and Adventures, and between Assault and Command. Imagine a game where you can watch Fox and Krystal's relationship crumble in real time
>>738354142newsflash: a lot of remakes include new modes
>>738345898>you can already just play the original on NSOretard
>>738345991WELL I DO FAGGOT!
>>738356364no it isnt. :)
>>738345991It's animals in space, how hard can it be?
>>738345898Capcom gets a free pass when they do it with resident evilWhy do you hate Nintendo for doing the same thing?
>>738345898Online multiplayer with randoms and the challenge mode.
>>738345991They don't even have to. They just have to make new fucking levels
>>738359846can you name a single RE game that has more than one remake
>>738358051This was obvious when they made Donkey Kong Odyssey
>>738345898You better puray on originaru hardoweah and no emurashion, facking gaijin pirate
>>738358243hell, make a prequel where you play as James showing the events leading up to 64. there's tons of stuff you could do
reminder that you can play it at a not ass framerate with the decomp, I think there's a widescreen mode too but I never bothered
>>738359689Yes it is. Just like Super Metroid is a remake of Metroid. I don't care if "technically its a sequel", if you're telling the same story over its a fucking remake.
>>738345991>progress the storyjust dont? no one cares?>defeat Andross!thats the story. Make 10x games where you defeat Andross each time. Who is pounding at nintendos door asking them to finish the story of a talking fox and his starship crew? literally no one cares.
>>738360204RE1 will definitely get a second remake.
>>738358243>Imagine a game where you can watch Fox and Krystal's relationship crumble in real timeWhat even was their chemistry?
>>738360938She was a pretty girl and Fox was the first dude that looks like her that Krystal had ever seen.
>>738345991The movie literally gave a plot synopsis that fox could of have>he got sent to a different universe so now he takes odd jobs to try and gather resources to find a way back home
>>738360789>storysuper is explicitly a sequel
>>738360789>same big bad means it's a remakeokay retard
>>738345991nobody gives a fuck about the story>there are bad guys. shoot them to winthat's it. that's all you need
>>738361269>>738361195Yes, same goes for Mega Man>b-b-but the robot masters are different>fireman is totally different from burnman is totally different from flameman is totally different from torchmandoesn't matter, they're all fucking remakes. Don't try to gaslight me into thinking its an original game if you're just repeating the same story with minor variations each time.
>>738360275That game was good, though.
>>738345898We need more high fidelity gwafix and industrial music.https://youtu.be/VYVFXYEm_Mw?list=RDVYVFXYEm_Mw
>>738361964No, you're just fucking retarded. Is every episode of a non-serialized show a remake of the first? Because by your logic, it is.
>>738361964>I'm just pretending to be retarded
>>738345898Tendies will buy anything
Star Fox fans bitch so much when anything strays from 64 so we will only receive Star Fox 64 from now on. I really hope the new game is successful so they'll make another one that isn't based on 64
>>738362228That shot does look pretty good.
>>738362259>>738362295Yes, if its the same shit over and over its a remake, stop coping.
>>738363312
>>738362443I got Adventures on release and played it so much I know exactly what cutscenes have distorted audio from the scratched up disc. I didn't have a problem with Assault, it was different and I liked the multiplayer. At the time I was okay with Command but I don't want to play that one anymore. Then they just stopped making anything else but 64 for 20 years. The only thing to look forward to for the new game is the online multiplayer.
>>738345898What is the point of playing the remake (64) when you can just play the original on NSO (SNES)?
>>738360789>64 is a remake of the originalagreed>super metroid is a remake of the originalabsolutely not, I'm not sure how someone can have such a contradicting standard>>738362259oh ok, you're just dumb
>>738365997sorry meant to reply to >>738361964
>>738365997If 64 were a remake, it wouldn't have the Landmaster or the Blue Marine. And all the shit from SNES SF would've been in 64. But I don't see no Phantron in 64. Do you?
>>738345991APAROIDSAPAROIDS
>>738366315If Zero was a remake, it wouldnt have the Gigorilla, GyroWing, and the new bosses.
>>738366675Yeah, that's a reimagining like 64 is to SNES.
>>738362013Doesn’t change the fact that there is no excuse for a 2025 game to have graphics that bad.
>>738360789You’re right in the sense LttP is loosely a remake of NES Zelda. They both just retread the same game but bigger.
>>738367376not at all. OOT has more in common with LTTP than LTTP does with NES Zelda.
>>738345898Why is Nintendo so afraid of making some new levels for a on rails shooter game? How hard can it be?
>>738345898>we can't make a new f-zero as we are out of ideas to innovate it>anyway here another star fox 64I doubt they could top GX/AX anyway so whatever but this is just pathetic
>>738366315>>738366675Ah yes, I forgot that a remake needs to be 1:1 with the original, silly me
>>738360891Only an autist nintendo fan wants to do the exact same fucking levels again in just better graphicsI want completely new environments and you would need a new story to do that
>>738345898Maybe we'll get some good music, instead of the satuday-morning-cartoon shit from the original 64.
>>738345898Because it's just humans wearing halloween masks.
Holy fuck why are they making 64 AGAIN? Theres no other series that is this afraid to just make a new game. Even 2d mario is less stagnant than this.
>>738345898but it has a new hat
